The Asheville Project: Short-Term Outcomes of a Community Pharmacy Diabetes Care Program

Carole W. Cranor PhD, Dale B. Christensen PhD
{"title":"The Asheville Project: Short-Term Outcomes of a Community Pharmacy Diabetes Care Program","authors":"Carole W. Cranor PhD,&nbsp;Dale B. Christensen PhD","doi":"10.1331/108658003321480696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess short-term clinical, economic, and humanistic outcomes of pharmaceutical care services (PCS) for patients with diabetes in community pharmacies.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Intention-to-treat, pre-post cohort-with-comparison group study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Twelve community pharmacies in Asheville, N.C.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Other Participants</h3><p>Eighty-five patients with diabetes who were employees, dependents, or retirees from two self-insured employers; community pharmacists who completed a diabetes certificate program and received reimbursement for PCS.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Patients scheduled consultations with pharmacists over 7 to 9 months. Pharmacists provided education, self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) meter training, clinical assessment, patient monitoring, follow-up, and referral. Group 1 patients began receiving PCS in March 1997, and group 2 patients began in March 1999.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Change from baseline in the two employer groups in glycosylated hemoglobin (A1c) values, serum lipid concentrations, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), satisfaction with pharmacy services, and health care utilization and costs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients used SMBG meters at home, stored all readings, and brought their meters with them to 87%; of the 317 PCS visits (3.7 visits per patient). Patients' A1c concentrations were significantly reduced, and their satisfaction with pharmacy services improved significantly. Patients experienced no change in HRQOL. From the payers' perspective, there was a significant $52 per patient per month increase in diabetes costs for both groups, with PCS fees and diabetes prescriptions accounting for most of the increase. In contrast, both groups experienced a nonsignificant but economically important 29%; decrease in nondiabetes costs and a 16%; decrease in all-diagnosis costs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A clear temporal relationship was found between PCS and improved A1c, improved patient satisfaction with pharmacy services, and decreased all-diagnosis costs. Findings from this study demonstrate that pharmacists provided effective cognitive services and refute the idea that pharmacists must be certified diabetes educators to help patients with diabetes improve clinical outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79444,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (Washington, D.C. : 1996)","volume":"43 2","pages":"Pages 149-159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1331/108658003321480696","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (Washington, D.C. : 1996)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S108658021530005X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Objectives

To assess short-term clinical, economic, and humanistic outcomes of pharmaceutical care services (PCS) for patients with diabetes in community pharmacies.

Design

Intention-to-treat, pre-post cohort-with-comparison group study.

Setting

Twelve community pharmacies in Asheville, N.C.

Patients and Other Participants

Eighty-five patients with diabetes who were employees, dependents, or retirees from two self-insured employers; community pharmacists who completed a diabetes certificate program and received reimbursement for PCS.

Interventions

Patients scheduled consultations with pharmacists over 7 to 9 months. Pharmacists provided education, self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) meter training, clinical assessment, patient monitoring, follow-up, and referral. Group 1 patients began receiving PCS in March 1997, and group 2 patients began in March 1999.

Main Outcome Measures

Change from baseline in the two employer groups in glycosylated hemoglobin (A1c) values, serum lipid concentrations, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), satisfaction with pharmacy services, and health care utilization and costs.

Results

Patients used SMBG meters at home, stored all readings, and brought their meters with them to 87%; of the 317 PCS visits (3.7 visits per patient). Patients' A1c concentrations were significantly reduced, and their satisfaction with pharmacy services improved significantly. Patients experienced no change in HRQOL. From the payers' perspective, there was a significant $52 per patient per month increase in diabetes costs for both groups, with PCS fees and diabetes prescriptions accounting for most of the increase. In contrast, both groups experienced a nonsignificant but economically important 29%; decrease in nondiabetes costs and a 16%; decrease in all-diagnosis costs.

Conclusion

A clear temporal relationship was found between PCS and improved A1c, improved patient satisfaction with pharmacy services, and decreased all-diagnosis costs. Findings from this study demonstrate that pharmacists provided effective cognitive services and refute the idea that pharmacists must be certified diabetes educators to help patients with diabetes improve clinical outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿什维尔项目:社区药房糖尿病护理项目的短期结果
目的评价社区药房为糖尿病患者提供药学服务(PCS)的短期临床、经济和人文效果。设计意向-治疗,前后队列-对照组研究。设置北卡罗来纳州阿什维尔的12家社区药房患者和其他参与者:85名糖尿病患者,他们是两个自我保险雇主的雇员、家属或退休人员;完成糖尿病证书课程并获得PCS报销的社区药剂师。干预措施患者在7至9个月内安排了与药剂师的会诊。药师提供教育、自我监测血糖(SMBG)仪培训、临床评估、患者监测、随访和转诊。第一组患者于1997年3月开始接受PCS治疗,第二组患者于1999年3月开始接受PCS治疗。主要观察指标:两组雇主在糖化血红蛋白(A1c)值、血脂浓度、健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)、药房服务满意度、医疗保健利用和成本方面与基线相比的变化。结果患者在家中使用SMBG仪,保存所有读数,并随身携带仪器至87%;在317次PCS就诊中(每位患者3.7次就诊)。患者糖化血红蛋白浓度显著降低,患者对药学服务的满意度显著提高。患者的HRQOL无变化。从支付方的角度来看,两组患者每个月的糖尿病费用都增加了52美元,其中PCS费用和糖尿病处方占了增加的大部分。相比之下,两组都经历了不显著但经济上重要的29%;非糖尿病患者成本降低16%;降低所有诊断费用。结论PCS与改善糖化血红蛋白、提高患者对药学服务的满意度、降低全诊费用有明显的时间关系。本研究结果表明,药剂师提供了有效的认知服务,并反驳了药剂师必须是经过认证的糖尿病教育者才能帮助糖尿病患者改善临床结果的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Proving That Pharmaceutical Care Makes a Difference in Community Pharmacy Sesquicentennial Stepping Stone Summits - Summit One: The Best Use of Technology in Pharmacy Practice The Asheville Project: Short-Term Outcomes of a Community Pharmacy Diabetes Care Program The Asheville Project: Factors Associated With Outcomes of a Community Pharmacy Diabetes Care Program The Asheville Project: Long-Term Clinical and Economic Outcomes of a Community Pharmacy Diabetes Care Program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1