Bioassay of lithocholic acid for possible carcinogenicity.

{"title":"Bioassay of lithocholic acid for possible carcinogenicity.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A bioassay for the possible carcinogenicity of lithocholic acid was conducted using Fischer 344 rats and B6C3F1 mice. Lithocholic acid was administered by gavage, at either of two dosages, to groups of 50 male and 50 female animals of each species, except for 49 low dose female rats. Twenty animals of each sex and species were placed on test as controls. The high and low dosages of lithocholic acid administered were, respectively, 500 and 250 mg/kg for rats and 250 and 125 mg/kg for mice. The compound was administered to rats and mice for 103 weeks. The period of compound administration was followed by an observation period of 1 week for rats and 2 weeks for mice. There were no significant positive associations between the dosages of lithocholic acid administered and mortality in rats or mice of either sex. Adequate numbers of animals in all groups survived sufficiently long to be at risk from late-developing tumors. Slight dose-related mean body weight depression was observed in male rats and female mice and high incidences of chronic kidney inflammation were observed in female rats, indicating that the dosages of lithocholic acid administered to these animals in this bioassay may have approximated the maximum tolerated dosages. Since no mean body weight depression, relative to controls, no significant accelerated mortality, and no other signs of toxicity were associated with administration of lithocholic acid to male mice, it is possible that these animals may have been able to tolerate a higher dosage. However, in the subchronic study there were deaths among all dosed male mouse groups, even those receiving lithocholic acid at a level only twofold greater than the high dose utilized in the chronic study. None of the statistical tests for any site in rats or in mice of either sex indicated a significant positive association between compound administration and tumor incidence. Under the conditions of this bioassay, lithocholic acid was not carcinogenic when administered by gavage to Fischer 344 rats or B6C3F1 mice.</p>","PeriodicalId":18935,"journal":{"name":"National Cancer Institute carcinogenesis technical report series","volume":"175 ","pages":"1-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Cancer Institute carcinogenesis technical report series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A bioassay for the possible carcinogenicity of lithocholic acid was conducted using Fischer 344 rats and B6C3F1 mice. Lithocholic acid was administered by gavage, at either of two dosages, to groups of 50 male and 50 female animals of each species, except for 49 low dose female rats. Twenty animals of each sex and species were placed on test as controls. The high and low dosages of lithocholic acid administered were, respectively, 500 and 250 mg/kg for rats and 250 and 125 mg/kg for mice. The compound was administered to rats and mice for 103 weeks. The period of compound administration was followed by an observation period of 1 week for rats and 2 weeks for mice. There were no significant positive associations between the dosages of lithocholic acid administered and mortality in rats or mice of either sex. Adequate numbers of animals in all groups survived sufficiently long to be at risk from late-developing tumors. Slight dose-related mean body weight depression was observed in male rats and female mice and high incidences of chronic kidney inflammation were observed in female rats, indicating that the dosages of lithocholic acid administered to these animals in this bioassay may have approximated the maximum tolerated dosages. Since no mean body weight depression, relative to controls, no significant accelerated mortality, and no other signs of toxicity were associated with administration of lithocholic acid to male mice, it is possible that these animals may have been able to tolerate a higher dosage. However, in the subchronic study there were deaths among all dosed male mouse groups, even those receiving lithocholic acid at a level only twofold greater than the high dose utilized in the chronic study. None of the statistical tests for any site in rats or in mice of either sex indicated a significant positive association between compound administration and tumor incidence. Under the conditions of this bioassay, lithocholic acid was not carcinogenic when administered by gavage to Fischer 344 rats or B6C3F1 mice.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
石胆酸可能致癌性的生物测定。
采用Fischer 344大鼠和B6C3F1小鼠对石胆酸可能的致癌性进行了生物测定。除49只低剂量雌性大鼠外,每组50只雄性和50只雌性大鼠以两种剂量中的任意一种灌胃石胆酸。各性别、各物种各20只作为对照进行试验。石胆酸给药高、低剂量分别为大鼠500、250 mg/kg,小鼠250、125 mg/kg。该化合物被给予大鼠和小鼠103周。复方给药期后,大鼠观察1周,小鼠观察2周。石胆酸的剂量与大鼠或小鼠的死亡率之间没有显著的正相关关系。所有组中都有足够数量的动物存活了足够长的时间,从而有患晚期肿瘤的风险。在雄性大鼠和雌性小鼠中观察到轻微的剂量相关的平均体重下降,在雌性大鼠中观察到高发生率的慢性肾脏炎症,表明在本生物试验中给予这些动物的石胆酸剂量可能接近最大耐受剂量。由于与对照组相比,雄性小鼠服用石胆酸没有出现平均体重下降、没有明显的死亡率加速以及没有其他毒性迹象,因此这些动物可能能够耐受更高的剂量。然而,在亚慢性研究中,所有给药的雄性小鼠组都有死亡,即使是那些接受石胆酸剂量仅比慢性研究中使用的高剂量大两倍的小鼠。在大鼠或雌雄小鼠的任何部位进行的统计试验均未显示复方用药与肿瘤发病率之间存在显著的正相关。在本实验条件下,石胆酸灌胃给Fischer 344大鼠或B6C3F1小鼠均无致癌性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bioassay of sulfisoxazole for possible carcinogenicity. Bioassay of diazinon for possible carcinogenicity. Bioassay of aldicarb for possible carcinogenicity. Bioassay of malaoxon for possible carcinogenicity. Bioassay of C.I. vat yellow 4 for possible carcinogenicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1