Kymberly R Allen, Caroline B Reinke, Joanne M Pohl, Kristy K Martyn, Elaine P McIntosh
{"title":"Nurse practitioner coding practices in primary care: a retrospective chart review.","authors":"Kymberly R Allen, Caroline B Reinke, Joanne M Pohl, Kristy K Martyn, Elaine P McIntosh","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-7599.2003.tb00364.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the coding and documentation practices of nurse practitioners (NPs) when using evaluation and management (E & M) codes in an academic primary care center.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A randomized retrospective review of ten charts from a nurse-managed primary care clinic affiliated with a midwestern research-intensive university.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings demonstrate that the documentation in the chart for six of the ten client encounters did not support the E & M codes assigned by the clinicis NPs. Four of these six client encounters were overcoded; the remaining two encounters were undercoded.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Findings of this study support the need for additional education of NPs in the areas of coding and documentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners","volume":"15 5","pages":"231-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2003.tb00364.x","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2003.tb00364.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the coding and documentation practices of nurse practitioners (NPs) when using evaluation and management (E & M) codes in an academic primary care center.
Data sources: A randomized retrospective review of ten charts from a nurse-managed primary care clinic affiliated with a midwestern research-intensive university.
Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that the documentation in the chart for six of the ten client encounters did not support the E & M codes assigned by the clinicis NPs. Four of these six client encounters were overcoded; the remaining two encounters were undercoded.
Implications for practice: Findings of this study support the need for additional education of NPs in the areas of coding and documentation.