Healthcare system use by risky alcohol drinkers: A secondary data analysis.

Barbara Heise
{"title":"Healthcare system use by risky alcohol drinkers: A secondary data analysis.","authors":"Barbara Heise","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00500.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the effects of at-risk alcohol use on patterns of healthcare use and health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Using the National Health Interview Survey and the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey, a total sample of 4449 adults, mean age 45 (SD 15), were grouped according to responses to the question: \"In the past year, on how many days did you have 5 or more drinks of any alcoholic beverage?\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Three categories of respondents were grouped as follows: not at-risk group = 0 days of 5+ drinks/day (n = 2991, 67%); the low at-risk group = 1-11 days of 5+ drinks/day (n = 796, 18%); and the high at-risk group = 12-365 days of 5+ drinks/day (n = 662, 15%). The level of risky alcohol use did not predict healthcare use or healthcare outcomes; high at-risk alcohol drinkers were less likely to use the healthcare system than other drinkers. When divided by rural versus urban living, rural high at-risk alcohol drinkers reported more emergency department visits and all rural living groups reported poorer physical and mental health than their urban counterparts.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Risky alcohol use, defined as drinking above low-risk guidelines, affects 3 out of 10 adults, and risky drinking plays a role in over 60 chronic health conditions. Nurse practitioners encounter risky alcohol users in multiple practice settings. It may be difficult to identify the underlying alcohol issues, particularly in those living in rural settings; however, identification of at-risk drinkers is essential for prompt intervention in the potential progression from risky alcohol use to an alcohol use disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":50020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners","volume":"22 5","pages":"256-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00500.x","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00500.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the effects of at-risk alcohol use on patterns of healthcare use and health outcomes.

Data sources: Using the National Health Interview Survey and the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey, a total sample of 4449 adults, mean age 45 (SD 15), were grouped according to responses to the question: "In the past year, on how many days did you have 5 or more drinks of any alcoholic beverage?"

Conclusions: Three categories of respondents were grouped as follows: not at-risk group = 0 days of 5+ drinks/day (n = 2991, 67%); the low at-risk group = 1-11 days of 5+ drinks/day (n = 796, 18%); and the high at-risk group = 12-365 days of 5+ drinks/day (n = 662, 15%). The level of risky alcohol use did not predict healthcare use or healthcare outcomes; high at-risk alcohol drinkers were less likely to use the healthcare system than other drinkers. When divided by rural versus urban living, rural high at-risk alcohol drinkers reported more emergency department visits and all rural living groups reported poorer physical and mental health than their urban counterparts.

Implications for practice: Risky alcohol use, defined as drinking above low-risk guidelines, affects 3 out of 10 adults, and risky drinking plays a role in over 60 chronic health conditions. Nurse practitioners encounter risky alcohol users in multiple practice settings. It may be difficult to identify the underlying alcohol issues, particularly in those living in rural settings; however, identification of at-risk drinkers is essential for prompt intervention in the potential progression from risky alcohol use to an alcohol use disorder.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高风险饮酒者使用医疗保健系统:二级数据分析。
目的:研究高危酒精使用对医疗保健使用模式和健康结果的影响。数据来源:使用国家健康访谈调查和医疗支出小组调查,总共有4449名成年人,平均年龄45岁(SD 15),根据对以下问题的回答进行分组:“在过去的一年里,你有多少天喝了5杯或5杯以上的酒精饮料?”结论:三类受访者分组如下:无风险组= 0天5+饮酒/天(n = 2991, 67%);低风险组= 1-11天,每天饮酒5次以上(n = 796, 18%);高危组= 12-365天,每天饮酒5次以上(n = 662, 15%)。危险酒精使用水平不能预测医疗保健使用或医疗保健结果;高风险的饮酒者比其他饮酒者更不可能使用医疗保健系统。当按农村和城市生活方式进行划分时,农村高危饮酒者报告的急诊次数更多,所有农村生活人群的身心健康状况都比城市人群差。对实践的影响:危险饮酒,定义为饮酒高于低风险指南,影响3 / 10的成年人,危险饮酒在60多种慢性健康状况中起作用。执业护士在多个执业环境中遇到危险的酒精使用者。可能很难确定潜在的酒精问题,特别是那些生活在农村的人;然而,识别有风险的饮酒者对于从危险饮酒到酒精使用障碍的潜在进展的及时干预是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The consensus model for regulation of APRNs: Implications for nurse practitioners. A literature review: Advance directives and patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Healthcare system use by risky alcohol drinkers: A secondary data analysis. Alternative placements for women wearing pedometers. Evaluating the sleep/wake cycle in persons with asthma: Three case scenarios.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1