Evaluation of novel particles as pulmonary delivery systems for insulin in rats.

AAPS PharmSci Pub Date : 2003-01-01 DOI:10.1208/ps050209
Lucila Garcia-Contreras, Tülin Morçöl, Steve J D Bell, Anthony J Hickey
{"title":"Evaluation of novel particles as pulmonary delivery systems for insulin in rats.","authors":"Lucila Garcia-Contreras, Tülin Morçöl, Steve J D Bell, Anthony J Hickey","doi":"10.1208/ps050209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of calcium phosphate (CAP) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) particles on the systemic delivery of insulin administered by the pulmonary route. Two methods of pulmonary delivery were employed: intratracheal instillation and spray instillation. Insulin-CAP-PEG particles in suspension (1.2 U/kg, 110-140 micro L) were administered to the lungs of fasted rats by intratracheal instillation (INCAPEG) or spray instillation (SINCAPEG). Control treatments consisted of insulin solution (1.2 U/kg) by intratracheal instillation, spray instillation, and subcutaneous administration (SC). Plasma concentrations of insulin and glucose were determined by chemiluminescence and colorimetric methods, respectively. Data were analyzed by compartmental and non-compartmental methods, and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters of insulin disposition were determined. PK analysis suggested that insulin administered in particles had a longer half-life, a longer mean residence time, and a smaller rate of elimination than insulin in solution. In addition, insulin bioavailability after SINCAPEG was 1.8-fold that of insulin solution administered SC. PD analysis showed that smaller areas under the effect curve and, conversely, larger areas above the effect curve were obtained after INCAPEG in comparison to insulin solution. The magnitude of this effect was increased after SINCAPEG. The presence of CAP-PEG particles appears to positively influence the disposition of insulin administered to the lungs of Sprague-Dawley rats. Spray instillation appears to be a more efficient method of delivering insulin to the lungs of rats than intratracheal instillation.</p>","PeriodicalId":6918,"journal":{"name":"AAPS PharmSci","volume":"5 2","pages":"E9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2751517/pdf/12248_2008_Article_52010.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS PharmSci","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/ps050209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of calcium phosphate (CAP) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) particles on the systemic delivery of insulin administered by the pulmonary route. Two methods of pulmonary delivery were employed: intratracheal instillation and spray instillation. Insulin-CAP-PEG particles in suspension (1.2 U/kg, 110-140 micro L) were administered to the lungs of fasted rats by intratracheal instillation (INCAPEG) or spray instillation (SINCAPEG). Control treatments consisted of insulin solution (1.2 U/kg) by intratracheal instillation, spray instillation, and subcutaneous administration (SC). Plasma concentrations of insulin and glucose were determined by chemiluminescence and colorimetric methods, respectively. Data were analyzed by compartmental and non-compartmental methods, and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters of insulin disposition were determined. PK analysis suggested that insulin administered in particles had a longer half-life, a longer mean residence time, and a smaller rate of elimination than insulin in solution. In addition, insulin bioavailability after SINCAPEG was 1.8-fold that of insulin solution administered SC. PD analysis showed that smaller areas under the effect curve and, conversely, larger areas above the effect curve were obtained after INCAPEG in comparison to insulin solution. The magnitude of this effect was increased after SINCAPEG. The presence of CAP-PEG particles appears to positively influence the disposition of insulin administered to the lungs of Sprague-Dawley rats. Spray instillation appears to be a more efficient method of delivering insulin to the lungs of rats than intratracheal instillation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估新型颗粒作为胰岛素肺输送系统在大鼠体内的应用。
这项研究的目的是评估磷酸钙(CAP)和聚乙二醇(PEG)颗粒对通过肺部途径全身给药胰岛素的影响。研究采用了两种肺部给药方法:气管内灌注和喷雾灌注。通过气管内灌注(INCAPEG)或喷雾灌注(SINCAPEG)将悬浮胰岛素-CAP-PEG 颗粒(1.2 U/kg,110-140 微升)注入禁食大鼠的肺部。对照组处理包括气管内灌注、喷雾灌注和皮下注射(SC)胰岛素溶液(1.2 U/kg)。血浆中的胰岛素和葡萄糖浓度分别用化学发光法和比色法测定。采用区室和非区室方法对数据进行了分析,并确定了胰岛素处置的药代动力学(PK)和药效学(PD)参数。PK 分析表明,与溶液胰岛素相比,颗粒胰岛素的半衰期更长,平均停留时间更长,消除率更低。此外,SINCAPEG 给药后的胰岛素生物利用度是静脉注射胰岛素溶液的 1.8 倍。PD分析表明,与胰岛素溶液相比,INCAPEG的效应曲线下面积较小,相反,效应曲线上面积较大。SINCAPEG 给药后,这种效应的幅度有所增加。CAP-PEG 颗粒的存在似乎对施用到 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠肺部的胰岛素的处置产生了积极影响。与气管内灌注相比,喷雾灌注似乎是一种更有效的向大鼠肺部输送胰岛素的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The composite solubility versus pH profile and its role in intestinal absorption prediction cDNA Microarray analysis of vascular gene expression after nitric oxide donor infusion in rats: Implications for nitrate tolerance mechanisms Is antisense an appropriate nomenclature or design for oligodeoxynucleotides aimed at the inhibition of HIV-1 replication? Novel system to investigate the effects of inhaled volume and rates of rise in simulated inspiratory air flow on fine particle output from a dry powder inhaler Allometric scaling of xenobiotic clearance: Uncertainty versus universality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1