Allometric scaling of xenobiotic clearance: Uncertainty versus universality

AAPS PharmSci Pub Date : 2008-01-01 DOI:10.1208/ps030429
T. Hu, W. Hayton
{"title":"Allometric scaling of xenobiotic clearance: Uncertainty versus universality","authors":"T. Hu, W. Hayton","doi":"10.1208/ps030429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statistical analysis and Monte Carlo simulation were used to characterize uncertainty in the allometric exponent (b) of xenobiotic clearance (CL). CL values for 115 xenobiotics were from published studies in which at least 3 species were used for the purpose of interspecies comparison of pharmacokinetics. The b value for each xenobiotic was calculated along with its confidence interval (CI). For 24 xenobiotics (21%), there was no correlation between log CL and log body weight. For the other 91 cases, the mean±standard deviation of the b values was 0.74±0.16; range: 0.29 to 1.2. Most (81%) of these individual b values did not differ from either 0.67 or 0.75 at P=0.05. When CL values for the subset of 91 substances were normalized to a common body weight coefficient (a), the b value for the 460 adjusted CL values was 0.74; the 99% CI was 0.71 to 0.76, which excluded 0.67. Monte Carlo simulation indicated that the wide range of observed b values could have resulted from random variability in CL values determined in a limited number of species, even though the underlying b value was 0.75. From the normalized CL values, 4 xenobiotic subgroups were examined: those that were (i) protein, and those that were (ii) eliminated mainly by renal excretion, (iii) by metabolism, or (iv) by renal excretion and metabolism combined. All subgroups except (ii) showed a b value not different from 0.75. The b value for the renal excretion subgroup (21 xenobiotics, 105 CL values) was 0.65, which differed from 0.75 but not from 0.67.","PeriodicalId":6918,"journal":{"name":"AAPS PharmSci","volume":"2 1","pages":"30-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"89","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS PharmSci","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/ps030429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 89

Abstract

Statistical analysis and Monte Carlo simulation were used to characterize uncertainty in the allometric exponent (b) of xenobiotic clearance (CL). CL values for 115 xenobiotics were from published studies in which at least 3 species were used for the purpose of interspecies comparison of pharmacokinetics. The b value for each xenobiotic was calculated along with its confidence interval (CI). For 24 xenobiotics (21%), there was no correlation between log CL and log body weight. For the other 91 cases, the mean±standard deviation of the b values was 0.74±0.16; range: 0.29 to 1.2. Most (81%) of these individual b values did not differ from either 0.67 or 0.75 at P=0.05. When CL values for the subset of 91 substances were normalized to a common body weight coefficient (a), the b value for the 460 adjusted CL values was 0.74; the 99% CI was 0.71 to 0.76, which excluded 0.67. Monte Carlo simulation indicated that the wide range of observed b values could have resulted from random variability in CL values determined in a limited number of species, even though the underlying b value was 0.75. From the normalized CL values, 4 xenobiotic subgroups were examined: those that were (i) protein, and those that were (ii) eliminated mainly by renal excretion, (iii) by metabolism, or (iv) by renal excretion and metabolism combined. All subgroups except (ii) showed a b value not different from 0.75. The b value for the renal excretion subgroup (21 xenobiotics, 105 CL values) was 0.65, which differed from 0.75 but not from 0.67.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
异种生物清除的异速缩放:不确定性与普遍性
统计分析和蒙特卡罗模拟表征了异种生物清除(CL)异速生长指数(b)的不确定性。115种外源药物的CL值来自已发表的研究,其中至少有3种用于种间药代动力学比较。计算每种异种生物的b值及其置信区间(CI)。对于24种外源性药物(21%),对数CL和对数体重之间没有相关性。其余91例,b值的平均值±标准差为0.74±0.16;范围:0.29到1.2。大多数(81%)的个体b值在P=0.05时没有0.67或0.75的差异。当91种物质子集的CL值归一化为共同的体重系数(a)时,460种调整后的CL值的b值为0.74;99% CI为0.71 ~ 0.76,排除0.67。蒙特卡罗模拟表明,观测到的b值的大范围可能是由于在有限数量的物种中确定的CL值的随机变异性造成的,即使潜在的b值为0.75。从标准化的CL值中,检查了4个外源亚组:(i)蛋白质,(ii)主要通过肾脏排泄消除的,(iii)通过代谢消除的,或(iv)通过肾脏排泄和代谢联合消除的。除(ii)外,所有亚组的b值均接近0.75。肾排泄亚组(21种异种药物,105种CL值)的b值为0.65,与0.75不同,但与0.67无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The composite solubility versus pH profile and its role in intestinal absorption prediction cDNA Microarray analysis of vascular gene expression after nitric oxide donor infusion in rats: Implications for nitrate tolerance mechanisms Is antisense an appropriate nomenclature or design for oligodeoxynucleotides aimed at the inhibition of HIV-1 replication? Novel system to investigate the effects of inhaled volume and rates of rise in simulated inspiratory air flow on fine particle output from a dry powder inhaler Allometric scaling of xenobiotic clearance: Uncertainty versus universality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1