Measuring leprosy stigma--a preliminary review of the leprosy literature.

Wim H van Brakel
{"title":"Measuring leprosy stigma--a preliminary review of the leprosy literature.","authors":"Wim H van Brakel","doi":"10.1489/1544-581X(2003)71<190:MLSPRO>2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A literature review was conducted to review work done to date on measuring stigma related to leprosy. References were obtained through a PubMed (Medline) search and through examining relevant bibliographies. Twelve papers were selected that addressed the issue of measurement of stigma and that contained a sample of the instrument used. Three unpublished studies were also included in the review. Studies that attempt to measure stigma can be broadly categorized in two groups, a) studies that assess the effects of stigma on the person affected, and b) surveys that assess community attitudes and/or practices. The study and questionnaire characteristics of the studies in both categories are described and compared. The studies reviewed indicate that leprosy stigma is still a global phenomenon, occurring in both endemic and non-endemic countries. The consequences of stigma affect individuals as well as the effectiveness of leprosy control activities. Despite enormous cultural diversity, the areas of life affected are remarkably similar. They included mobility, interpersonal relationships, marriage, employment, leisure activities, and attendance at social and religious functions. This suggests that development of a standard stigma scale for leprosy may be possible. Data obtained with such an instrument would useful in situational analysis, advocacy work, monitoring and evaluation of interventions against stigma, and research to better understand stigma and its determinants.</p>","PeriodicalId":14078,"journal":{"name":"International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases : official organ of the International Leprosy Association","volume":"71 3","pages":"190-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"113","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases : official organ of the International Leprosy Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1489/1544-581X(2003)71<190:MLSPRO>2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 113

Abstract

A literature review was conducted to review work done to date on measuring stigma related to leprosy. References were obtained through a PubMed (Medline) search and through examining relevant bibliographies. Twelve papers were selected that addressed the issue of measurement of stigma and that contained a sample of the instrument used. Three unpublished studies were also included in the review. Studies that attempt to measure stigma can be broadly categorized in two groups, a) studies that assess the effects of stigma on the person affected, and b) surveys that assess community attitudes and/or practices. The study and questionnaire characteristics of the studies in both categories are described and compared. The studies reviewed indicate that leprosy stigma is still a global phenomenon, occurring in both endemic and non-endemic countries. The consequences of stigma affect individuals as well as the effectiveness of leprosy control activities. Despite enormous cultural diversity, the areas of life affected are remarkably similar. They included mobility, interpersonal relationships, marriage, employment, leisure activities, and attendance at social and religious functions. This suggests that development of a standard stigma scale for leprosy may be possible. Data obtained with such an instrument would useful in situational analysis, advocacy work, monitoring and evaluation of interventions against stigma, and research to better understand stigma and its determinants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量麻风病耻感——对麻风病文献的初步回顾。
进行了一项文献综述,以审查迄今为止在测量与麻风病有关的耻辱方面所做的工作。通过PubMed (Medline)检索和检查相关书目获得参考文献。选择了12篇论文,讨论了病耻感的测量问题,并包含了所使用仪器的样本。三个未发表的研究也包括在综述中。试图测量耻辱感的研究可以大致分为两组,a)评估耻辱感对受影响者的影响的研究,b)评估社区态度和/或做法的调查。对两类研究的研究和问卷特点进行了描述和比较。所审查的研究表明,麻风污名仍然是一种全球现象,在流行国家和非流行国家都有发生。污名化的后果影响到个人以及麻风病控制活动的有效性。尽管文化差异巨大,但受影响的生活领域却惊人地相似。这些因素包括流动性、人际关系、婚姻、就业、休闲活动以及参加社交和宗教活动。这表明制定麻风病的标准病耻感量表是可能的。通过这种工具获得的数据将有助于情景分析、宣传工作、监测和评估针对耻辱的干预措施,以及更好地了解耻辱及其决定因素的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visible deformity in childhood leprosy--a 10-year study. Close contacts with leprosy in newly diagnosed leprosy patients in a high and low endemic area: comparison between Bangladesh and Thailand. Factors contributing to the decline of leprosy in Spain in the second half of the twentieth century. Study of apoptosis in skin lesions of leprosy in relation to treatment and lepra reactions. Myiasis in leprosy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1