Patch-testing practices of American Contact Dermatitis Society members: a cross-sectional survey.

Erin M Warshaw, Jane Blowers Moore, David Nelson
{"title":"Patch-testing practices of American Contact Dermatitis Society members: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Erin M Warshaw,&nbsp;Jane Blowers Moore,&nbsp;David Nelson","doi":"10.2310/6620.2003.38741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patch testing is an example of how medicine blends art and science, resulting in differences among practitioners in methods of history taking, application of patch tests, and interpretation of results.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the \"art\" of patch testing (specifically, the prevalence of Thin-Layer Rapid Use Epicutaneous (T.R.U.E.) TEST use, photopatch testing, patch testing to dust mites, and immediate testing for latex allergy) as practiced by American Contact Dermatitis Society (ACDS) members and to compare the results of this survey with those of similar studies among United States dermatologists and allergists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of all 322 members of the ACDS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 46%. The largest proportions of respondents were male, had practiced for 11 to 20 years, were located in the northeast United States, and were in private practice. Forty percent of respondents used T.R.U.E. TEST, and 65% performed photopatch testing. Seventy percent of respondents evaluated patients for latex allergy, and 15% patch-tested to dust mites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As expected, respondents reported significantly higher prevalences of patch testing, photopatch testing, and evaluation for latex allergy than did United States dermatologists generally. Respondents reported significantly lower prevalences of single patch-test readings and use of T.R.U.E. TEST than did either general United States dermatologists or general United States allergists.</p>","PeriodicalId":7612,"journal":{"name":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","volume":"14 1","pages":"5-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2310/6620.2003.38741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Background: Patch testing is an example of how medicine blends art and science, resulting in differences among practitioners in methods of history taking, application of patch tests, and interpretation of results.

Objective: To evaluate the "art" of patch testing (specifically, the prevalence of Thin-Layer Rapid Use Epicutaneous (T.R.U.E.) TEST use, photopatch testing, patch testing to dust mites, and immediate testing for latex allergy) as practiced by American Contact Dermatitis Society (ACDS) members and to compare the results of this survey with those of similar studies among United States dermatologists and allergists.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of all 322 members of the ACDS.

Results: The response rate was 46%. The largest proportions of respondents were male, had practiced for 11 to 20 years, were located in the northeast United States, and were in private practice. Forty percent of respondents used T.R.U.E. TEST, and 65% performed photopatch testing. Seventy percent of respondents evaluated patients for latex allergy, and 15% patch-tested to dust mites.

Conclusions: As expected, respondents reported significantly higher prevalences of patch testing, photopatch testing, and evaluation for latex allergy than did United States dermatologists generally. Respondents reported significantly lower prevalences of single patch-test readings and use of T.R.U.E. TEST than did either general United States dermatologists or general United States allergists.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国接触性皮炎协会成员的补丁测试实践:一项横断面调查。
背景:斑贴试验是医学如何融合艺术和科学的一个例子,导致从业者在历史记录方法、斑贴试验的应用和结果解释方面存在差异。目的:评价贴片检测的“艺术性”(特别是薄层快速使用表皮贴片(T.R.U.E.))美国接触性皮炎协会(ACDS)成员采用的TEST使用、光贴片测试、对尘螨的贴片测试和对乳胶过敏的即时测试,并将本调查结果与美国皮肤科医生和过敏症专家的类似研究结果进行比较。方法:对322名ACDS会员进行横断面调查。结果:有效率为46%。受访者的最大比例是男性,执业11至20年,位于美国东北部,并在私人执业。40%的受访者使用T.R.U.E. TEST, 65%的受访者进行光贴测试。70%的受访者对患者的乳胶过敏进行了评估,15%的受访者对尘螨进行了斑贴测试。结论:正如预期的那样,受访者报告的贴片测试、光贴测试和乳胶过敏评估的患病率明显高于美国皮肤科医生。受访者报告说,与普通美国皮肤科医生或普通美国过敏症专家相比,单次贴片测试读数和使用T.R.U.E. TEST的流行率明显较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Allergy to corticosteroids: update and review of epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and structural cross-reactivity. Factors influencing the induction phase of skin sensitization. Contact dermatitis education in dermatology residency programs: can (will) the American Contact Dermatitis Society be a force for improvement? Contact dermatitis in adolescents. Disperse dyes in fabrics of patients patch-test-positive to disperse dyes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1