Sensitization to palladium chloride: a 10-year evaluation.

Francesca Larese Filon, Daniele Uderzo, Emma Bagnato
{"title":"Sensitization to palladium chloride: a 10-year evaluation.","authors":"Francesca Larese Filon,&nbsp;Daniele Uderzo,&nbsp;Emma Bagnato","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palladium is increasingly used in industry, jewelry, and dentistry and is becoming more common since the European directive restricting the use of nickel in all products placed in direct and prolonged contact with the skin.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The role of palladium sensitization is still unclear, and the aim of our study is to evaluate the trend of sensitization in a contact dermatitis clinic population during a 10-year period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We report our experience with 4,446 patients (3,077 female, 1,369 male; mean age, 40.1 +/-13.7 years) with suspected contact dermatitis patch-tested during the period of 1991 to 2000.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A positive patch-test result to palladium chloride 1% was indicated in 236 patients (5.3%), with a higher percentage in females (6.7%) than in males (2.3%), and the sensitization to this metal has increased over the specified period, to a maximum in the year 2000 (9.7%). In the majority of cases, subjects were polysensitized (92.8%), but 7.2% of subjects were patch-test positive only to palladium. Of palladium-sensitized patients, 40.5% complained of hand dermatitis, 47.4% complained of body dermatitis, and 1.7% complained of burning mouth syndrome. Palladium sensitization is significantly related to female sex (OR = 3.08; 95% CI, 2.07-4.61) and to sensitization to other metals, with a maximum for nickel sulfate (OR = 32.9; 95% CI, 21.3-51.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sensitization to palladium is increasing by the year, reaching high values, but its role in reducing sensitization and symptoms is still unclear because of the frequent cosensitization with nickel and the low number of monosensitized patients with relevant sensitizations. We need to follow palladium sensitization in future years to verify an increase of sensitization due to the increasing use of this metal.</p>","PeriodicalId":7612,"journal":{"name":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","volume":"14 2","pages":"78-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Palladium is increasingly used in industry, jewelry, and dentistry and is becoming more common since the European directive restricting the use of nickel in all products placed in direct and prolonged contact with the skin.

Objective: The role of palladium sensitization is still unclear, and the aim of our study is to evaluate the trend of sensitization in a contact dermatitis clinic population during a 10-year period.

Methods: We report our experience with 4,446 patients (3,077 female, 1,369 male; mean age, 40.1 +/-13.7 years) with suspected contact dermatitis patch-tested during the period of 1991 to 2000.

Results: A positive patch-test result to palladium chloride 1% was indicated in 236 patients (5.3%), with a higher percentage in females (6.7%) than in males (2.3%), and the sensitization to this metal has increased over the specified period, to a maximum in the year 2000 (9.7%). In the majority of cases, subjects were polysensitized (92.8%), but 7.2% of subjects were patch-test positive only to palladium. Of palladium-sensitized patients, 40.5% complained of hand dermatitis, 47.4% complained of body dermatitis, and 1.7% complained of burning mouth syndrome. Palladium sensitization is significantly related to female sex (OR = 3.08; 95% CI, 2.07-4.61) and to sensitization to other metals, with a maximum for nickel sulfate (OR = 32.9; 95% CI, 21.3-51.5).

Conclusion: Sensitization to palladium is increasing by the year, reaching high values, but its role in reducing sensitization and symptoms is still unclear because of the frequent cosensitization with nickel and the low number of monosensitized patients with relevant sensitizations. We need to follow palladium sensitization in future years to verify an increase of sensitization due to the increasing use of this metal.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氯化钯致敏性:10年评价。
背景:钯越来越多地用于工业、珠宝和牙科,自欧洲指令限制在所有与皮肤直接和长时间接触的产品中使用镍以来,钯变得越来越普遍。目的:钯致敏的作用尚不清楚,我们研究的目的是评估接触性皮炎临床人群在10年期间的致敏趋势。方法:我们报告了4446例患者的经验(女性3077例,男性1369例;平均年龄40.1±13.7岁),1991年至2000年期间经斑贴试验怀疑患有接触性皮炎。结果:236例(5.3%)患者对氯化钯1%的贴片试验结果呈阳性,女性(6.7%)高于男性(2.3%),对该金属的敏化程度在特定时期内有所增加,在2000年达到最大值(9.7%)。在大多数病例中,受试者是多敏化的(92.8%),但7.2%的受试者仅对钯呈斑贴试验阳性。在钯致敏患者中,40.5%的患者有手部皮炎,47.4%的患者有全身皮炎,1.7%的患者有灼口综合征。钯致敏性与女性显著相关(OR = 3.08;95% CI, 2.07-4.61)和对其他金属的敏化,最大的是硫酸镍(OR = 32.9;95% ci, 21.3-51.5)。结论:钯的致敏性逐年增加,达到较高值,但由于与镍的共致敏频繁,且单致敏患者中有相关致敏的患者较少,其在减轻致敏和症状中的作用尚不清楚。我们需要在未来几年跟踪钯的敏化,以验证由于这种金属的使用增加而增加的敏化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Allergy to corticosteroids: update and review of epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and structural cross-reactivity. Factors influencing the induction phase of skin sensitization. Contact dermatitis education in dermatology residency programs: can (will) the American Contact Dermatitis Society be a force for improvement? Contact dermatitis in adolescents. Disperse dyes in fabrics of patients patch-test-positive to disperse dyes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1