Validation of a modified version of the Gijon's social-familial evaluation scale (SFES): the "Barcelona SFES Version", for patients with cognitive impairment.

P Garcia-Caselles, R Miralles, M Arellano, R M Torres, A Aguilera, M Pi-Figueras, A M Cervera
{"title":"Validation of a modified version of the Gijon's social-familial evaluation scale (SFES): the \"Barcelona SFES Version\", for patients with cognitive impairment.","authors":"P Garcia-Caselles,&nbsp;R Miralles,&nbsp;M Arellano,&nbsp;R M Torres,&nbsp;A Aguilera,&nbsp;M Pi-Figueras,&nbsp;A M Cervera","doi":"10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim was to validate an abbreviated version of the Gijon's social-familial evaluation scale (SFES) (Barcelona-SFES version), on patients with cognitive impairment. A group of 34 patients with cognitive impairment, admitted to an intermediate-long-term-care facility, were analyzed. Mean age was 80.2 +/- 7.4 years. Gijón's SFES was abbreviated and only the first three item groups corresponding to family conditions, social contacts and assistance from the social network were selected. Barcelona-SFES version had a range score between 3 to 15 points, in which low scores identify older patients who live with their family, have good contacts, and participate in community activities. In contrast, high scores identify older persons who live alone and have poor social support and little participation with community activities. Three social risk categories were established according to the Barcelona-SFES score: low social risk (>/= 7 points), intermediate social risk (8-9 points) and high social points). Validation criteria used in the present study were: predictive value of Barcelona-SFES score of post-discharge destination (home or institution), and patient's (or family's) request for a definitive institutionalization in a nursing home. There were 9 patients with low social risk (26.4 %), 8 with intermediate social risk (23.5 %) and 17 with high social risk (50 %). A significant relationship between Barcelona-SFES scores and post-discharge destination was found. Eighty percent of patients discharged to an institution(nursing and residential homes), they had high social risk SFES scores (>/= 10) Also, a significant correlation was found between the number of patients for which a definitive institutionalization request was performed and the Barcelona-SFES scores. Fifteen (88.2 %) of the 18 patients for whom the request was done, were in the high social risk group. The lowest scores from SFES were predictive of home discharge, while the highest scores were predictive of a definitive institutionalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":77833,"journal":{"name":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.028","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

The aim was to validate an abbreviated version of the Gijon's social-familial evaluation scale (SFES) (Barcelona-SFES version), on patients with cognitive impairment. A group of 34 patients with cognitive impairment, admitted to an intermediate-long-term-care facility, were analyzed. Mean age was 80.2 +/- 7.4 years. Gijón's SFES was abbreviated and only the first three item groups corresponding to family conditions, social contacts and assistance from the social network were selected. Barcelona-SFES version had a range score between 3 to 15 points, in which low scores identify older patients who live with their family, have good contacts, and participate in community activities. In contrast, high scores identify older persons who live alone and have poor social support and little participation with community activities. Three social risk categories were established according to the Barcelona-SFES score: low social risk (>/= 7 points), intermediate social risk (8-9 points) and high social points). Validation criteria used in the present study were: predictive value of Barcelona-SFES score of post-discharge destination (home or institution), and patient's (or family's) request for a definitive institutionalization in a nursing home. There were 9 patients with low social risk (26.4 %), 8 with intermediate social risk (23.5 %) and 17 with high social risk (50 %). A significant relationship between Barcelona-SFES scores and post-discharge destination was found. Eighty percent of patients discharged to an institution(nursing and residential homes), they had high social risk SFES scores (>/= 10) Also, a significant correlation was found between the number of patients for which a definitive institutionalization request was performed and the Barcelona-SFES scores. Fifteen (88.2 %) of the 18 patients for whom the request was done, were in the high social risk group. The lowest scores from SFES were predictive of home discharge, while the highest scores were predictive of a definitive institutionalization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对认知障碍患者的希洪社会家庭评估量表(SFES)的修改版本的验证:“巴塞罗那SFES版本”。
目的是验证希洪社会家庭评估量表(SFES)的简化版本(巴塞罗那-SFES版本),用于认知障碍患者。一组34名认知障碍患者,入院的中长期护理机构,进行了分析。平均年龄80.2±7.4岁。Gijón的sses是缩写的,只选择了与家庭条件、社会联系和社会网络援助相对应的前三个项目组。巴塞罗那- sfes版本的评分范围在3到15分之间,得分低的老年患者与家人住在一起,有良好的联系,并参加社区活动。相比之下,得分高的老年人独居,缺乏社会支持,很少参与社区活动。根据barcelona - sses评分,将社会风险分为低社会风险(>/= 7分)、中等社会风险(8-9分)和高社会风险三类。本研究中使用的验证标准是:出院后目的地(家庭或机构)的barcelona - sses评分的预测价值,以及患者(或家属)对养老院明确制度化的要求。低社会风险9例(26.4%),中等社会风险8例(23.5%),高社会风险17例(50%)。巴塞罗那- sfes评分与出院后目的地之间存在显著关系。80%的患者出院到一个机构(护理和住宅),他们有高社会风险SFES评分(>/= 10)。此外,被执行明确的机构化请求的患者数量与巴塞罗那-SFES评分之间存在显著的相关性。在接受治疗的18例患者中,有15例(88.2%)属于高社会风险组。SFES的最低分数预示着出院,而最高分数预示着最终的机构化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness and safety of cholinesterase inhibitors in elderly subjects with Alzheimer's disease: a "real world" study. Assessment of the health status in the Massa Lombarda cohort: a preliminary description of the program evaluating cardio-cerebro-vascular disease risk factors and quality of life in an elderly population. Unconventional affective symptoms and executive functions after stroke in the elderly. Sleep disturbances in elderly: a subjective evaluation over 65. Prevalence of delirium in a geriatric convalescence hospitalization unit: patient's clinical characteristics and risk precipitating factor analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1