Clinical impact of different scores of the mini nutritional assessment (MNA) in the diagnosis of malnutrition in patients with cognitive impairment.

M Arellano, M P Garcia-Caselles, M Pi-Figueras, R Miralles, R M Torres, A Aguilera, A M Cervera
{"title":"Clinical impact of different scores of the mini nutritional assessment (MNA) in the diagnosis of malnutrition in patients with cognitive impairment.","authors":"M Arellano,&nbsp;M P Garcia-Caselles,&nbsp;M Pi-Figueras,&nbsp;R Miralles,&nbsp;R M Torres,&nbsp;A Aguilera,&nbsp;A M Cervera","doi":"10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It was aimed at evaluating the clinical usefulness of the mini nutritional assessment (MNA) to identify malnutrition in elderly patients with cognitive impairment, admitted to a geriatric convalescence unit (intermediate care facility). Sixty-three patients with cognitive impairment were studied. Cognitive impairment was considered when mini mental state examination (MMSE) scores were below 21. MNA and a nutritional evaluation according to the sequential model of the American Institute of Nutrition (AIN) were performed at admission. According to the AIN criteria, malnutrition was considered, if there were abnormalities in at least one of the following parameters: albumin, cholesterol, body mass index (BMI), and branchial circumference. Based on these criteria, 27 patients (42.8%) proved to be undernourished at admission, whereas if taking the original MNA scores, 39 patients (61.9%) were undernourished, 23 (36.5%) were at risk of malnutrition, and 1 (1.5%) was normal. The analyzed population was divided in four categories (quartiles) of the MNA scores: very low (</= 13.5), low (> 13.5 and </= 16), intermediate (> 16 and </= 18.5) and high (> 18.5). Likelihood ratios of each MNA quartile were obtained by dividing the percentage of patients in a given MNA category who were undernourished (according to AIN) by the percentage of patients in the same MNA category who were not undernourished. In the very low MNA quartile, this likelihood ratio was 2.79 and for the low MNA quartile it was 0.49. For intermediate and high MNA categories, likelihood ratios were 1.0 and 0.07 respectively. In the present study, MNA identified undernourished patients with a high clinical diagnostic impact value only, when very low scores (</= 13) are obtained.</p>","PeriodicalId":77833,"journal":{"name":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.006","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

It was aimed at evaluating the clinical usefulness of the mini nutritional assessment (MNA) to identify malnutrition in elderly patients with cognitive impairment, admitted to a geriatric convalescence unit (intermediate care facility). Sixty-three patients with cognitive impairment were studied. Cognitive impairment was considered when mini mental state examination (MMSE) scores were below 21. MNA and a nutritional evaluation according to the sequential model of the American Institute of Nutrition (AIN) were performed at admission. According to the AIN criteria, malnutrition was considered, if there were abnormalities in at least one of the following parameters: albumin, cholesterol, body mass index (BMI), and branchial circumference. Based on these criteria, 27 patients (42.8%) proved to be undernourished at admission, whereas if taking the original MNA scores, 39 patients (61.9%) were undernourished, 23 (36.5%) were at risk of malnutrition, and 1 (1.5%) was normal. The analyzed population was divided in four categories (quartiles) of the MNA scores: very low ( 13.5 and 16 and 18.5). Likelihood ratios of each MNA quartile were obtained by dividing the percentage of patients in a given MNA category who were undernourished (according to AIN) by the percentage of patients in the same MNA category who were not undernourished. In the very low MNA quartile, this likelihood ratio was 2.79 and for the low MNA quartile it was 0.49. For intermediate and high MNA categories, likelihood ratios were 1.0 and 0.07 respectively. In the present study, MNA identified undernourished patients with a high clinical diagnostic impact value only, when very low scores (

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微型营养评估(MNA)不同评分对认知障碍患者营养不良诊断的临床影响。
它的目的是评估微型营养评估(MNA)的临床用途,以确定在老年康复单位(中间护理机构)住院的老年认知障碍患者的营养不良。对63例认知障碍患者进行了研究。最小精神状态检查(MMSE)得分低于21分,认为存在认知障碍。入院时根据美国营养学会(AIN)的顺序模型进行MNA和营养评估。根据AIN标准,如果以下参数中至少有一项出现异常,即白蛋白、胆固醇、体重指数(BMI)和鳃围,则考虑为营养不良。根据这些标准,27例(42.8%)患者在入院时被证明营养不良,而如果采用原始MNA评分,39例(61.9%)患者营养不良,23例(36.5%)有营养不良风险,1例(1.5%)正常。被分析的人群按MNA得分分为四类(四分位数):非常低(13.5、16和18.5)。每个MNA四分位数的似然比是通过将特定MNA类别中营养不良(根据AIN)的患者百分比除以同一MNA类别中未营养不良的患者百分比获得的。在非常低的MNA四分位数中,该似然比为2.79,而在低MNA四分位数中,该似然比为0.49。对于中等和高MNA类别,似然比分别为1.0和0.07。在本研究中,MNA仅在非常低的评分(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness and safety of cholinesterase inhibitors in elderly subjects with Alzheimer's disease: a "real world" study. Assessment of the health status in the Massa Lombarda cohort: a preliminary description of the program evaluating cardio-cerebro-vascular disease risk factors and quality of life in an elderly population. Unconventional affective symptoms and executive functions after stroke in the elderly. Sleep disturbances in elderly: a subjective evaluation over 65. Prevalence of delirium in a geriatric convalescence hospitalization unit: patient's clinical characteristics and risk precipitating factor analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1