Comparison of data-driven techniques for daily streamflow forecasting

IF 3.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Pub Date : 2023-08-12 DOI:10.1007/s13762-023-05131-0
P. de Bourgoing, A. Malekian
{"title":"Comparison of data-driven techniques for daily streamflow forecasting","authors":"P. de Bourgoing,&nbsp;A. Malekian","doi":"10.1007/s13762-023-05131-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Four artificial intelligence methods are compared for streamflow forecasting. The models are tested using 20 years of daily streamflow values in seven basins of the Zagros Mountain Range, Iran. The models considered in the study are artificial neural networks (ANNs), Artificial Neural Networks trained with Ant Colony Optimization for continuous domains (ACO<sub>ℝ</sub>–ANN), Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) and Multigene Genetic Programming (MGGP). The performances of the models are measured by the root mean square error, the coefficient of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) and the Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency. Depending on the basin, ANN, ANFIS or MGGP is the best performing method. None of the methods outperforms the others for all the basins. Overall, the best-performing model is ANN and the worst is ACO<sub>ℝ</sub>–ANN. The physical and climate characteristics of the basins influence the models’ performances.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":589,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","volume":"20 10","pages":"11093 - 11106"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13762-023-05131-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Four artificial intelligence methods are compared for streamflow forecasting. The models are tested using 20 years of daily streamflow values in seven basins of the Zagros Mountain Range, Iran. The models considered in the study are artificial neural networks (ANNs), Artificial Neural Networks trained with Ant Colony Optimization for continuous domains (ACO–ANN), Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) and Multigene Genetic Programming (MGGP). The performances of the models are measured by the root mean square error, the coefficient of determination (R2) and the Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency. Depending on the basin, ANN, ANFIS or MGGP is the best performing method. None of the methods outperforms the others for all the basins. Overall, the best-performing model is ANN and the worst is ACO–ANN. The physical and climate characteristics of the basins influence the models’ performances.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
每日流量预测的数据驱动技术比较
比较了四种人工智能方法在流量预测中的应用。这些模型使用伊朗扎格罗斯山脉7个盆地20年的日流量值进行了测试。研究中考虑的模型有人工神经网络(ann)、连续域蚁群优化训练的人工神经网络(ACO -ANN)、自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)和多基因遗传规划(MGGP)。模型的性能由均方根误差、决定系数(R2)和Nash-Sutcliffe模型效率来衡量。根据流域的不同,ANN、ANFIS或MGGP是表现最好的方法。没有一种方法在所有盆地中都优于其他方法。总体而言,表现最好的模型是人工神经网络,最差的模型是ACO -ANN。流域的自然和气候特征影响着模型的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
806
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (IJEST) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of environmental science and technology, innovation, engineering and management. A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes: peer reviewed original research articles, case and technical reports, reviews and analyses papers, short communications and notes to the editor, in interdisciplinary information on the practice and status of research in environmental science and technology, both natural and man made. The main aspects of research areas include, but are not exclusive to; environmental chemistry and biology, environments pollution control and abatement technology, transport and fate of pollutants in the environment, concentrations and dispersion of wastes in air, water, and soil, point and non-point sources pollution, heavy metals and organic compounds in the environment, atmospheric pollutants and trace gases, solid and hazardous waste management; soil biodegradation and bioremediation of contaminated sites; environmental impact assessment, industrial ecology, ecological and human risk assessment; improved energy management and auditing efficiency and environmental standards and criteria.
期刊最新文献
Lipid production by Tetradesmus obliquus M42 and valorization of the deoiled biomass for toxic dyes removal Research on urban building energy consumption simulation based on a three-dimensional geographic information system Navigating sustainability transitions: technological innovation, clean energy, and ecological footprint Optimization of fat, oil, and grease (FOG) biodegradation using consortium of bacteria Efficient degradation of caffeine using silver-doped TiO2 photocatalyst: kinetics, mechanism, and process optimization via decision tree modeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1