Impact of community development initiatives and access to community markets on household food security and nutrition in Ghana

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Food Policy Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102282
Paul Kwame Nkegbe , Yazeed Abdul Mumin
{"title":"Impact of community development initiatives and access to community markets on household food security and nutrition in Ghana","authors":"Paul Kwame Nkegbe ,&nbsp;Yazeed Abdul Mumin","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, we investigate the impact of community development initiatives and community markets on household food security and nutrition using nationally representative dataset of 16,772 households in Ghana. We estimate a multinomial endogenous switching regression of the impacts of these interventions on food security and nutrition while accounting for unobserved heterogeneities of households and communities in the allocation of these interventions. The results show that both interventions significantly increase household food security and nutrition, although the effects are much larger when these interventions are implemented together than in isolation. Moreover, the intervention strategies come at a cost of economic inefficiency in resource allocation which ends up making some households worse off. Thus, policymakers could consider implementing specific but complementary development interventions together and improving engagement with beneficiaries of such policies to ensure interventions are indeed effective and pro-poor.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 102282"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919222000616","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the impact of community development initiatives and community markets on household food security and nutrition using nationally representative dataset of 16,772 households in Ghana. We estimate a multinomial endogenous switching regression of the impacts of these interventions on food security and nutrition while accounting for unobserved heterogeneities of households and communities in the allocation of these interventions. The results show that both interventions significantly increase household food security and nutrition, although the effects are much larger when these interventions are implemented together than in isolation. Moreover, the intervention strategies come at a cost of economic inefficiency in resource allocation which ends up making some households worse off. Thus, policymakers could consider implementing specific but complementary development interventions together and improving engagement with beneficiaries of such policies to ensure interventions are indeed effective and pro-poor.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区发展倡议和进入社区市场对加纳家庭粮食安全和营养的影响
在本研究中,我们使用加纳16,772个家庭的全国代表性数据集调查了社区发展举措和社区市场对家庭粮食安全和营养的影响。我们估计了这些干预措施对粮食安全和营养影响的多项内生转换回归,同时考虑了这些干预措施分配中未观察到的家庭和社区的异质性。结果表明,这两种干预措施都显著提高了家庭粮食安全和营养,尽管这些干预措施一起实施的效果要比单独实施的效果大得多。此外,干预策略的代价是资源配置的经济效率低下,最终使一些家庭变得更糟。因此,政策制定者可以考虑共同实施具体但互补的发展干预措施,并加强与这些政策受益者的接触,以确保干预措施确实有效并有利于穷人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
期刊最新文献
Viewpoint: Toward a sustainable Green Revolution in sub-Saharan Africa: The case of maize and rice Expanding the phytosanitary exclusion zone for Mexican avocados: Market impacts and unintended consequences Small wins in practice: Learnings from 16 European initiatives working towards the transformation of urban food systems Information interventions and willingness to pay for PICS bags: Evidence from Sierra Leone Do moral constraints and government interventions promote the willingness and behaviors of food saving among urban residents in China? An empirical study based on structural equation model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1