A comparison of economic aspects of hospitalization versus ambulatory care in the management of neuritis occurring in lepra reaction.

Ravi H N, Renu George, Elizabeth P Eapen, Susanne A Pulimood, Chandran Gnanamuthu, Mary Jacob, K R John
{"title":"A comparison of economic aspects of hospitalization versus ambulatory care in the management of neuritis occurring in lepra reaction.","authors":"Ravi H N,&nbsp;Renu George,&nbsp;Elizabeth P Eapen,&nbsp;Susanne A Pulimood,&nbsp;Chandran Gnanamuthu,&nbsp;Mary Jacob,&nbsp;K R John","doi":"10.1489/1544-581X(2004)72<448:ACOEAO>2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuritis is one of the important causes of deformities and disabilities in leprosy. Neuritis has been managed both in the field and in hospital. This study was done to compare the economic aspects of cost of ambulatory vs in-patient management of neuritis in leprosy. The quality of life of the affected patients and the clinical improvement in the 2 groups were also studied. Twenty six patients fulfilling the study criteria were randomized into the ambulatory and in-patient group (13 in each group). The primary outcome examined was cost, in various categories; the secondary outcomes included pre- and post-treatment comparison of Quality of Life (QOL) scores and tests of sensory and motor function. The direct and indirect medical costs incurred by patients in the hospitalized group were higher than those patients in the ambulatory group. The difference in the direct medical costs between the two groups was Rs. 9110.5, and the extra direct non medical costs incurred by patients in the hospitalized group was Rs. 888.50 because of more frequent visits of family members. A greater percentage of ambulatory than in-patients returned to work in </= 15 days (53.8% vs 15.3%), and the mean duration before returning to work was 19.5 days ambulatory patients compared to 66.8 days for in-patients group. The QOL scores and motor and sensory function tests showed no significant difference between groups. Although the sample size was small, these preliminary results suggest that substantial cost minimization by ambulatory care is possible without significantly affecting the quality of life or peripheral nerve function.</p>","PeriodicalId":14078,"journal":{"name":"International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases : official organ of the International Leprosy Association","volume":"72 4","pages":"448-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases : official organ of the International Leprosy Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1489/1544-581X(2004)72<448:ACOEAO>2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Neuritis is one of the important causes of deformities and disabilities in leprosy. Neuritis has been managed both in the field and in hospital. This study was done to compare the economic aspects of cost of ambulatory vs in-patient management of neuritis in leprosy. The quality of life of the affected patients and the clinical improvement in the 2 groups were also studied. Twenty six patients fulfilling the study criteria were randomized into the ambulatory and in-patient group (13 in each group). The primary outcome examined was cost, in various categories; the secondary outcomes included pre- and post-treatment comparison of Quality of Life (QOL) scores and tests of sensory and motor function. The direct and indirect medical costs incurred by patients in the hospitalized group were higher than those patients in the ambulatory group. The difference in the direct medical costs between the two groups was Rs. 9110.5, and the extra direct non medical costs incurred by patients in the hospitalized group was Rs. 888.50 because of more frequent visits of family members. A greater percentage of ambulatory than in-patients returned to work in

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻风反应中发生的神经炎的住院治疗与门诊治疗的经济方面的比较。
神经炎是导致麻风畸形和残疾的重要原因之一。神经炎在现场和医院都得到了治疗。本研究的目的是比较麻风病患者神经炎门诊治疗与住院治疗的经济成本。观察两组患者的生活质量及临床改善情况。符合研究标准的26例患者随机分为门诊组和住院组(每组13例)。审查的主要结果是各种类别的费用;次要结果包括治疗前和治疗后生活质量(QOL)评分比较以及感觉和运动功能测试。住院组患者的直接和间接医疗费用均高于门诊组。两组之间的直接医疗费用差异为9110.5卢比,住院组患者因家庭成员探望更频繁而产生的额外直接非医疗费用为888.50卢比。门诊病人返回工作岗位的比例高于住院病人
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visible deformity in childhood leprosy--a 10-year study. Close contacts with leprosy in newly diagnosed leprosy patients in a high and low endemic area: comparison between Bangladesh and Thailand. Factors contributing to the decline of leprosy in Spain in the second half of the twentieth century. Study of apoptosis in skin lesions of leprosy in relation to treatment and lepra reactions. Myiasis in leprosy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1