Now you see it, now you don't: Variable hemineglect in a commissurotomized man

Michael C. Corballis , Paul M. Corballis , Mara Fabri , Aldo Paggi , Tullio Manzoni
{"title":"Now you see it, now you don't: Variable hemineglect in a commissurotomized man","authors":"Michael C. Corballis ,&nbsp;Paul M. Corballis ,&nbsp;Mara Fabri ,&nbsp;Aldo Paggi ,&nbsp;Tullio Manzoni","doi":"10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We describe the case of a callosotomized man, D.D.V., who shows unusual neglect of stimuli in the left visual field (LVF). This is manifest in simple reaction time (RT) to stimuli flashed in the LVF and in judging whether pairs of filled circles in the LVF are of the same or different color. It may reflect strong left-hemispheric control and consequent attention restricted to the right side of space. It is not evident in simple RT when there are continuous markers in the visual fields to indicate the locations of the stimuli. In this condition, his RTs are actually faster to LVF than to right visual field (RVF) stimuli, suggesting a switch to right-hemispheric control that eliminates the hemineglect. Neglect is also not evident when D.D.V. responds by pointing to or touching the locations of the stimuli, perhaps because these responses are controlled by the dorsal rather than the ventral visual system. Despite his atypical manifestations of hemineglect, D.D.V. showed evidence of functional disconnection typical of split-brained subjects, including prolonged crossed–uncrossed different in simple reaction time, inability to match colors between visual fields, and enhanced redundancy gain in simple RT to bilateral stimuli even when the stimulus in the LVF was neglected.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100287,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Brain Research","volume":"25 2","pages":"Pages 521-530"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.002","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926641005002235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

We describe the case of a callosotomized man, D.D.V., who shows unusual neglect of stimuli in the left visual field (LVF). This is manifest in simple reaction time (RT) to stimuli flashed in the LVF and in judging whether pairs of filled circles in the LVF are of the same or different color. It may reflect strong left-hemispheric control and consequent attention restricted to the right side of space. It is not evident in simple RT when there are continuous markers in the visual fields to indicate the locations of the stimuli. In this condition, his RTs are actually faster to LVF than to right visual field (RVF) stimuli, suggesting a switch to right-hemispheric control that eliminates the hemineglect. Neglect is also not evident when D.D.V. responds by pointing to or touching the locations of the stimuli, perhaps because these responses are controlled by the dorsal rather than the ventral visual system. Despite his atypical manifestations of hemineglect, D.D.V. showed evidence of functional disconnection typical of split-brained subjects, including prolonged crossed–uncrossed different in simple reaction time, inability to match colors between visual fields, and enhanced redundancy gain in simple RT to bilateral stimuli even when the stimulus in the LVF was neglected.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现在你看到了,现在你看不到了:一个共产主义化的男人的可变半忽视
我们描述的情况下,胼胝体切除的人,D.D.V,谁表现出不寻常的忽视刺激在左视野(LVF)。这体现在对LVF中闪现的刺激的简单反应时间(RT)和判断LVF中填充的圆圈对是否具有相同或不同的颜色。它可能反映了强烈的左半球控制和随之而来的注意力限制在空间的右侧。在简单的RT中,当视野中有连续的标记来指示刺激的位置时,这种现象并不明显。在这种情况下,他的RTs对LVF的反应实际上比对右视野(RVF)刺激的反应要快,这表明右半球控制的转换消除了半忽视。当D.D.V.通过指向或触摸刺激的位置做出反应时,忽视也不明显,也许是因为这些反应是由背侧视觉系统而不是腹侧视觉系统控制的。尽管他的非典型表现是半忽视,但D.D.V.显示出分裂脑受试者典型的功能断开的证据,包括交叉-非交叉的简单反应时间延长,无法匹配视野之间的颜色,即使在LVF的刺激被忽略时,简单RT对双侧刺激的冗余增益也会增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Author Index Optic flow dominates visual scene polarity in causing adaptive modification of locomotor trajectory Partial unilateral inactivation of the dorsal hippocampus impairs spatial memory in the MWM Accessing world knowledge: Evidence from N400 and reaction time priming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1