Development of measures of individual leadership for health promotion.

Donna Anderson, Ronald C Plotnikoff, Kim Raine, Linda Barrett
{"title":"Development of measures of individual leadership for health promotion.","authors":"Donna Anderson,&nbsp;Ronald C Plotnikoff,&nbsp;Kim Raine,&nbsp;Linda Barrett","doi":"10.1108/13660750510594846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This purpose of this research was to develop and establish psychometric properties of scales measuring individual leadership for health promotion.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>Scales to measure leadership in health promotion were drafted based on capacity assessment instruments developed by other provinces involved in the Canadian Heart Health Initiative (CHHI), and on the literature. Content validity was established through a series of focus groups and expert opinion appraisals and pilot testing. Psychometric analyses provided empirical evidence of the construct validity and reliability of the leadership scales in the baseline survey (n = 144) of the Alberta Heart Health Project.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Principal component analysis verified the construct of the leadership scales of personal work-related practices and satisfaction with work-related practices. Each of the theoretically a prior determined scales factored into two scales each for a total of four final scales. Scale alpha coefficients (Cronbach's alpha) ranged between 0.71 and 0.78, thus establishing good scale internal consistencies.</p><p><strong>Research limitations/implications: </strong>Limitations include the relatively small sample size used in determining psychometric properties. In addition, further qualitative work would enhance understanding of the complexity of leadership in health organizations. These measures can be used by both researchers and practitioners for the assessment leadership for health promotion and to tailor interventions to increase leadership for health promotion in health organizations.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>Establishing the psychometric properties and quality of leadership measures is an innovative step toward achieving capacity assessment instruments which facilitate evaluation of key relationships in developing health sector capacity for health promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":80009,"journal":{"name":"International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services","volume":"18 2-3","pages":"i-xii"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/13660750510594846","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/13660750510594846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Purpose: This purpose of this research was to develop and establish psychometric properties of scales measuring individual leadership for health promotion.

Design/methodology/approach: Scales to measure leadership in health promotion were drafted based on capacity assessment instruments developed by other provinces involved in the Canadian Heart Health Initiative (CHHI), and on the literature. Content validity was established through a series of focus groups and expert opinion appraisals and pilot testing. Psychometric analyses provided empirical evidence of the construct validity and reliability of the leadership scales in the baseline survey (n = 144) of the Alberta Heart Health Project.

Findings: Principal component analysis verified the construct of the leadership scales of personal work-related practices and satisfaction with work-related practices. Each of the theoretically a prior determined scales factored into two scales each for a total of four final scales. Scale alpha coefficients (Cronbach's alpha) ranged between 0.71 and 0.78, thus establishing good scale internal consistencies.

Research limitations/implications: Limitations include the relatively small sample size used in determining psychometric properties. In addition, further qualitative work would enhance understanding of the complexity of leadership in health organizations. These measures can be used by both researchers and practitioners for the assessment leadership for health promotion and to tailor interventions to increase leadership for health promotion in health organizations.

Originality/value: Establishing the psychometric properties and quality of leadership measures is an innovative step toward achieving capacity assessment instruments which facilitate evaluation of key relationships in developing health sector capacity for health promotion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定促进健康的个人领导措施。
目的:本研究的目的是开发和建立健康促进个人领导的心理测量特性。设计/方法/方法:根据参与加拿大心脏健康倡议(CHHI)的其他省份制定的能力评估工具和文献,起草了衡量健康促进领导能力的量表。内容效度是通过一系列焦点小组和专家意见评估以及试点测试来建立的。心理测量分析为艾伯塔省心脏健康项目基线调查(n = 144)领导量表的结构效度和信度提供了经验证据。结果:主成分分析验证了个人工作实践和工作实践满意度领导量表的构建。每个理论上预先确定的量表被分解成两个量表,每个量表共有四个最终量表。量表alpha系数(Cronbach’s alpha)在0.71 ~ 0.78之间,建立了良好的量表内部一致性。研究局限性/启示:局限性包括用于确定心理测量特性的样本量相对较小。此外,进一步的定性工作将增进对卫生组织领导复杂性的了解。研究人员和从业人员都可以使用这些措施来评估健康促进的领导力,并定制干预措施,以提高卫生组织中健康促进的领导力。独创性/价值:确立领导措施的心理测量特性和质量是实现能力评估工具的一个创新步骤,这些工具有助于评估发展卫生部门促进健康能力方面的关键关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patient-centredness. The implications of management by walking about: a case study of a German hospital. British out-of-hours primary and community care: a review of the literature. An analysis of international health care logistics: the benefits and implications of implementing just-in-time systems in the health care industry. The barriers to patient-driven treatment in mental health: why patients may choose to follow their own path.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1