Use of submaximal inhalation and spirometry to assess the effects of ozone exposure.

Archives of environmental health Pub Date : 2004-02-01
William F McDonnell
{"title":"Use of submaximal inhalation and spirometry to assess the effects of ozone exposure.","authors":"William F McDonnell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spirometric measures of airway obstruction are strongly influenced by the neurally mediated reduction in total lung capacity that accompanies ozone exposure. This study was conducted to evaluate a method for quantifying the effects of performing spirometry from a reduced inspiratory position on measures of airway obstruction, and to apply the method to published ozone-response data. Nineteen healthy, nonsmoking adults, 18-30 yr of age, each performed 17 forced expiratory maneuvers from inspiratory volumes that ranged from functional residual capacity to total lung capacity. In general, measures of airway obstruction were related strongly to total expired volume, and approximately 80% of the ozone-induced decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1.0) resulted from the reduction in forced vital capacity. Results indicated that, for young, healthy, nonsmoking adults, spirometric values from maneuvers conducted from reduced inspiratory positions can be predicted accurately and precisely in the unexposed state, allowing interpretation of measures of ozone-induced airway obstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":8155,"journal":{"name":"Archives of environmental health","volume":"59 2","pages":"76-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of environmental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spirometric measures of airway obstruction are strongly influenced by the neurally mediated reduction in total lung capacity that accompanies ozone exposure. This study was conducted to evaluate a method for quantifying the effects of performing spirometry from a reduced inspiratory position on measures of airway obstruction, and to apply the method to published ozone-response data. Nineteen healthy, nonsmoking adults, 18-30 yr of age, each performed 17 forced expiratory maneuvers from inspiratory volumes that ranged from functional residual capacity to total lung capacity. In general, measures of airway obstruction were related strongly to total expired volume, and approximately 80% of the ozone-induced decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1.0) resulted from the reduction in forced vital capacity. Results indicated that, for young, healthy, nonsmoking adults, spirometric values from maneuvers conducted from reduced inspiratory positions can be predicted accurately and precisely in the unexposed state, allowing interpretation of measures of ozone-induced airway obstruction.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用次最大吸入和肺活量测定法评估臭氧暴露的影响。
呼吸道阻塞的肺活量测量受到伴随臭氧暴露的神经介导的总肺活量减少的强烈影响。本研究旨在评估一种量化从降低吸气体位进行肺活量测定对气道阻塞测量的影响的方法,并将该方法应用于已发表的臭氧响应数据。19名年龄在18-30岁的健康非吸烟成年人,从吸入量到功能残余量到总肺活量,每人进行了17次强制呼气动作。总的来说,气道阻塞的措施与总呼气量密切相关,臭氧引起的1 s内用力呼气量减少(FEV1.0)中约有80%是由于用力肺活量的减少。结果表明,对于年轻、健康、不吸烟的成年人,在未暴露状态下,从降低吸气体位进行的动作中获得的肺活量测量值可以准确和精确地预测,从而可以解释臭氧引起的气道阻塞的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What constitutes good science in environmental and occupational health? Health hazards from volcanic gases: a systematic literature review. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts and breast cancer: a pooled analysis. Gliomas and farm pesticide exposure in men: the upper midwest health study. Determination of environmental exposure to asbestos (tremolite) and mesothelioma risks in the southeastern region of Turkey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1