Closer in time when farther in space—Spatial factors in audiovisual temporal integration

Toemme Noesselt , Robert Fendrich , Bjoern Bonath , Sascha Tyll , Hans-Jochen Heinze
{"title":"Closer in time when farther in space—Spatial factors in audiovisual temporal integration","authors":"Toemme Noesselt ,&nbsp;Robert Fendrich ,&nbsp;Bjoern Bonath ,&nbsp;Sascha Tyll ,&nbsp;Hans-Jochen Heinze","doi":"10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigated the effect of visual eccentricity and spatial alignment on judgments of audiovisual synchrony. Sequences of flashes at 4, 6, and 8 Hz were presented centrally, or at horizontal eccentricities of 6° or 18°. Concurrent sequences of clicks were presented at the same rate as the flashes, or at higher or lower rates. Subjects judged whether the flash rate was the same as (synchronous with), faster than, or slower than the click rate. With the 4- and 6-Hz flash rates, subjects' judgments of audiovisual synchrony increased with increasing eccentricity, but only when the click rate was more rapid than the flash rate. This effect remained even when the size of the peripheral visual stimuli was adjusted to compensate for cortical magnification, and was not significantly influenced by the spatial proximity of the auditory and visual signals. However, it was absent when the auditory and visual stimuli were presented serially rather than concurrently. With the 8-Hz flash rate, synchrony judgments were prevalent irrespective of eccentricity. When two serially presented flash rates were compared, visual–visual matching judgments increased with eccentricity at flash rates of 6 Hz and higher, but decreased at flash rates below 6 Hz. Finally, when two concurrent flash rates were compared, visual–visual synchrony judgments increased with eccentricity at all flash-rate combinations. Together, these results suggest that while perceptual uncertainty can play a role in synchrony judgments at rates of 6 Hz and higher, below 6 Hz eccentricity produces a widening of the window of apparent audiovisual temporal synchrony which perceptual uncertainty cannot explain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100287,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Brain Research","volume":"25 2","pages":"Pages 443-458"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.07.005","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926641005001977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

We investigated the effect of visual eccentricity and spatial alignment on judgments of audiovisual synchrony. Sequences of flashes at 4, 6, and 8 Hz were presented centrally, or at horizontal eccentricities of 6° or 18°. Concurrent sequences of clicks were presented at the same rate as the flashes, or at higher or lower rates. Subjects judged whether the flash rate was the same as (synchronous with), faster than, or slower than the click rate. With the 4- and 6-Hz flash rates, subjects' judgments of audiovisual synchrony increased with increasing eccentricity, but only when the click rate was more rapid than the flash rate. This effect remained even when the size of the peripheral visual stimuli was adjusted to compensate for cortical magnification, and was not significantly influenced by the spatial proximity of the auditory and visual signals. However, it was absent when the auditory and visual stimuli were presented serially rather than concurrently. With the 8-Hz flash rate, synchrony judgments were prevalent irrespective of eccentricity. When two serially presented flash rates were compared, visual–visual matching judgments increased with eccentricity at flash rates of 6 Hz and higher, but decreased at flash rates below 6 Hz. Finally, when two concurrent flash rates were compared, visual–visual synchrony judgments increased with eccentricity at all flash-rate combinations. Together, these results suggest that while perceptual uncertainty can play a role in synchrony judgments at rates of 6 Hz and higher, below 6 Hz eccentricity produces a widening of the window of apparent audiovisual temporal synchrony which perceptual uncertainty cannot explain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在时间上越近,在空间上越远
我们研究了视觉偏心率和空间对准对视听同步判断的影响。4、6和8hz的闪光序列出现在中心,或出现在6°或18°的水平偏心率处。同时出现的咔哒声序列以与闪光相同的速率呈现,或以更高或更低的速率呈现。受试者判断闪速是否与点击速度相同(同步)、快于或慢于点击速度。在4 hz和6 hz闪烁频率下,被试对视听同步性的判断随偏心率的增加而增加,但只有当点击速度比闪烁速度快时才会增加。即使周围视觉刺激的大小被调整以补偿皮层的放大,这种效应仍然存在,并且听觉和视觉信号的空间接近性没有显著影响。然而,当听觉和视觉刺激连续呈现而不是同时呈现时,则不存在这种现象。在8赫兹的闪烁频率下,同步判断普遍存在,与偏心无关。当两种连续呈现的闪烁频率进行比较时,视觉-视觉匹配判断在6 Hz及更高的闪烁频率下随着偏心率的增加而增加,而在低于6 Hz的闪烁频率下则下降。最后,当比较两种同步闪速时,在所有闪速组合下,视觉-视觉同步判断随偏心率增加而增加。总之,这些结果表明,虽然感知不确定性可以在6 Hz或更高的速率下对同步判断起作用,但低于6 Hz的偏心率会产生表观视听时间同步窗口的扩大,这是感知不确定性无法解释的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Author Index Optic flow dominates visual scene polarity in causing adaptive modification of locomotor trajectory Partial unilateral inactivation of the dorsal hippocampus impairs spatial memory in the MWM Accessing world knowledge: Evidence from N400 and reaction time priming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1