Effects of alphabeticality, practice and type of instruction on reading an artificial script: An fMRI study

Tali Bitan , David Manor , Istvan A. Morocz , Avi Karni
{"title":"Effects of alphabeticality, practice and type of instruction on reading an artificial script: An fMRI study","authors":"Tali Bitan ,&nbsp;David Manor ,&nbsp;Istvan A. Morocz ,&nbsp;Avi Karni","doi":"10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>In neuroimaging studies of word reading in natural scripts, the effect of alphabeticality is often confounded with the effect of practice. We used an artificial script to separately manipulate the effects of practice and alphabeticality following training with and without explicit letter instructions. Participants received multi-session training in reading nonsense words, written in an artificial script, wherein each </span>phoneme was represented by 2 discrete symbols </span><span>[7]</span><span>. Three training conditions were compared: alphabetical whole words with letter decoding instruction (explicit); alphabetical whole-words (implicit) and non-alphabetical whole-words (arbitrary). Each participant was trained on the arbitrary condition and on one of the alphabetical conditions (explicit or implicit). fMRI scans were acquired after training during reading of trained words and relatively novel words in the alphabetical and arbitrary conditions. Our results showed greater activation in the explicit compared to the arbitrary conditions, but only for relatively-novel words, in the left posterior inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). In the implicit condition, the left posterior IFG was active in both trained and relatively novel words. These results indicate the involvement of the left posterior IFG in letter decoding, and suggest that reading of explicitly well-trained words did not rely on letter decoding, while in implicitly trained words letter decoding persisted into later stages. The superior parietal lobules showed reduced activation for items that received more practice, across all training conditions. Altogether, our results suggest that the alphabeticality of the word, the amount of practice and type of instructions have independent and interacting effects on brain activation during reading.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":100287,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Brain Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"Pages 90-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.04.014","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926641005001175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

In neuroimaging studies of word reading in natural scripts, the effect of alphabeticality is often confounded with the effect of practice. We used an artificial script to separately manipulate the effects of practice and alphabeticality following training with and without explicit letter instructions. Participants received multi-session training in reading nonsense words, written in an artificial script, wherein each phoneme was represented by 2 discrete symbols [7]. Three training conditions were compared: alphabetical whole words with letter decoding instruction (explicit); alphabetical whole-words (implicit) and non-alphabetical whole-words (arbitrary). Each participant was trained on the arbitrary condition and on one of the alphabetical conditions (explicit or implicit). fMRI scans were acquired after training during reading of trained words and relatively novel words in the alphabetical and arbitrary conditions. Our results showed greater activation in the explicit compared to the arbitrary conditions, but only for relatively-novel words, in the left posterior inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). In the implicit condition, the left posterior IFG was active in both trained and relatively novel words. These results indicate the involvement of the left posterior IFG in letter decoding, and suggest that reading of explicitly well-trained words did not rely on letter decoding, while in implicitly trained words letter decoding persisted into later stages. The superior parietal lobules showed reduced activation for items that received more practice, across all training conditions. Altogether, our results suggest that the alphabeticality of the word, the amount of practice and type of instructions have independent and interacting effects on brain activation during reading.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
字母顺序、练习和教学类型对阅读人工手写体的影响:一项功能磁共振成像研究
在自然文字阅读的神经影像学研究中,字母顺序的影响常常与练习的影响相混淆。我们使用一个人工脚本来分别控制练习和字母顺序的效果,在有或没有明确的字母指示的情况下进行训练。参与者接受了多次训练,学习阅读用人工书写的无意义单词,其中每个音素由2个离散符号[7]表示。比较三种训练条件:字母整词加字母解码指令(显性);字母整词(隐含)和非字母整词(任意)。每个参与者都接受了任意条件和字母顺序条件之一(显性或隐性)的训练。功能磁共振成像扫描是在训练后阅读训练单词和相对陌生的单词在字母和任意条件下获得的。我们的研究结果显示,与任意条件相比,在明确条件下,左侧额下后回(IFG)的激活程度更高,但这仅适用于相对陌生的单词。在内隐条件下,左后侧IFG在训练过的单词和相对陌生的单词中都很活跃。这些结果表明左后侧IFG参与字母解码,并表明阅读明确训练好的单词不依赖于字母解码,而在隐性训练的单词中,字母解码持续到后期阶段。在所有训练条件下,顶叶上小叶在接受更多练习的项目上的激活程度都有所降低。总之,我们的研究结果表明,单词的字母顺序、练习的数量和指导的类型对阅读过程中的大脑活动有独立和相互作用的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Author Index Optic flow dominates visual scene polarity in causing adaptive modification of locomotor trajectory Partial unilateral inactivation of the dorsal hippocampus impairs spatial memory in the MWM Accessing world knowledge: Evidence from N400 and reaction time priming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1