EFL Lecturers' Metadiscourse in Chinese University MOOCs Across Course Types.

IF 1.3 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Corpus Pragmatics Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-27 DOI:10.1007/s41701-021-00098-0
Dongyun Zhang, Diyun Sheng
{"title":"EFL Lecturers' Metadiscourse in Chinese University MOOCs Across Course Types.","authors":"Dongyun Zhang,&nbsp;Diyun Sheng","doi":"10.1007/s41701-021-00098-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the spread of COVID-19 in China at the beginning of 2020, MOOCs, as a kind of currently popular online learning resource, have played a dominant role in higher education field. However, chiefly focusing on teaching organization and learning process in MOOCs, previous studies have paid inadequate attention to lecturers' discourse. In order to provide some useful views on this issue, this study investigates EFL lecturers' metadiscourse in Chinese university MOOCs to sketch its distinctive pattern across course types. Based on a self-built corpus, this research adopted interpersonal model as theoretical foundation and analyzed the frequency and functions of metadiscourse by AntConc 3.5.7 and IBM SPSS 23. Findings suggest that specific educational context in MOOCs leads to low frequency of metadiscourse and its use is mainly aimed at the enhancement of intelligibility, reliability, and interactivity. Besides, course types with different knowledge structures also exert certain influence on metadiscourse usage. Course types focusing on procedural knowledge (i.e. the knowledge related to practical process) tend to apply metadiscourse to enhance intelligibility and interactivity, while the ones stressing declarative knowledge (i.e. the knowledge related to explicit facts) attach more importance to reliability. Lastly, the paper concludes with implications for EFL lecturers' metadiscourse in Chinese university MOOCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":52343,"journal":{"name":"Corpus Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s41701-021-00098-0","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corpus Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-021-00098-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

With the spread of COVID-19 in China at the beginning of 2020, MOOCs, as a kind of currently popular online learning resource, have played a dominant role in higher education field. However, chiefly focusing on teaching organization and learning process in MOOCs, previous studies have paid inadequate attention to lecturers' discourse. In order to provide some useful views on this issue, this study investigates EFL lecturers' metadiscourse in Chinese university MOOCs to sketch its distinctive pattern across course types. Based on a self-built corpus, this research adopted interpersonal model as theoretical foundation and analyzed the frequency and functions of metadiscourse by AntConc 3.5.7 and IBM SPSS 23. Findings suggest that specific educational context in MOOCs leads to low frequency of metadiscourse and its use is mainly aimed at the enhancement of intelligibility, reliability, and interactivity. Besides, course types with different knowledge structures also exert certain influence on metadiscourse usage. Course types focusing on procedural knowledge (i.e. the knowledge related to practical process) tend to apply metadiscourse to enhance intelligibility and interactivity, while the ones stressing declarative knowledge (i.e. the knowledge related to explicit facts) attach more importance to reliability. Lastly, the paper concludes with implications for EFL lecturers' metadiscourse in Chinese university MOOCs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨课程类型的中国大学mooc英语讲师元语篇
随着2020年初新冠肺炎疫情在中国的蔓延,mooc作为当前流行的一种在线学习资源,在高等教育领域发挥了主导作用。然而,以往的研究主要集中在mooc的教学组织和学习过程上,对讲师话语的关注不够。为了对这一问题提供一些有用的观点,本研究对中国大学慕课中英语讲师的元话语进行了调查,勾勒出其不同课程类型的独特模式。本研究以自建语料库为基础,以人际关系模型为理论基础,运用AntConc 3.5.7软件和IBM SPSS 23软件对元话语的频率和功能进行分析。研究结果表明,mooc中特定的教育情境导致元话语的使用频率较低,元话语的使用主要是为了提高可理解性、可靠性和互动性。此外,不同知识结构的课程类型对元话语的使用也有一定的影响。注重程序性知识(即与实际过程相关的知识)的课程类型倾向于运用元语篇来增强可理解性和互动性,而注重陈述性知识(即与显性事实相关的知识)的课程类型更注重可靠性。最后,本文提出了对我国大学慕课英语讲师元语篇的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Corpus Pragmatics
Corpus Pragmatics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Corpus Pragmatics offers a forum for theoretical and applied linguists who carry out research in the new linguistic discipline that stands at the interface between corpus linguistics and pragmatics. The journal promotes the combination of the two approaches through research on new topics in linguistics, with a particular focus on interdisciplinary studies, and to enlarge and implement current pragmatic theories that have hitherto not benefited from empirical corpus support. Authors are encouraged to describe the statistical analyses used in their research and to supply the data and scripts in R when possible. The objective of Corpus Pragmatics is to develop pragmatics with the aid of quantitative corpus methodology. The journal accepts original research papers, short research notes, and occasional thematic issues. The journal follows a double-blind peer review system.
期刊最新文献
Attitudinal Resources in Academic Talks: A Corpus-Based Analysis Across Languages “But Never Do be Long Without Writing Us, for Altho' Many Miles Divide Us We Have Your Welfare at Heart”: An Analysis of Requests in Intimate Discourse in Irish Emigrants’ Letters (1700–1940) Unmasking Malicious Stance Indicators and Attitudinal Priming: An ‘Evaluative Textbite’ Approach to Identity Attacks in Violent Extremist Discourse Review of Collocations, Corpora and Language Learning Review of the Pragmatics of Humour in Interactive Contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1