Alliance predicting progress in couple therapy.

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-02-04 DOI:10.1037/pst0000355
Terje Tilden, Sverre Urnes Johnson, Asle Hoffart, Rune Zahl-Olsen, Bruce E Wampold, Pål Ulvenes, Åshild Tellefsen Håland
{"title":"Alliance predicting progress in couple therapy.","authors":"Terje Tilden,&nbsp;Sverre Urnes Johnson,&nbsp;Asle Hoffart,&nbsp;Rune Zahl-Olsen,&nbsp;Bruce E Wampold,&nbsp;Pål Ulvenes,&nbsp;Åshild Tellefsen Håland","doi":"10.1037/pst0000355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The therapeutic alliance has gained status as a common factor in psychotherapy due to its robust predictive relationship with outcome. The current challenge in our field is to gain a more nuanced understanding of alliance's impact on the progress of treatment over the course of therapy. In the current study, alliance was measured on 3 dimensions: (a) the individual's as well as the couple's joint perception of alliance with the therapist (\"self/group-therapist\"), (b) each partner's perception of the alliance between the spouse and the therapist (\"other-therapist\"), and (c) the couple's assessment of alliance with each other (\"within-system\"). Based on self-reported data from 165 adult clients, we analyzed whether scores on these alliance dimensions at the beginning of therapy predicted the frequently measured outcomes on individual symptoms and relationship distress during treatment. We found that 2 of the alliance dimensions, the \"self/group-therapist\" and the \"other-therapist,\" at the start of treatment predicted the slopes of the outcome measures. These findings add to established research suggesting that early establishment of alliance is an important predictor for progress during treatment. Variations in the results among the 3 alliance dimensions suggest the usefulness of the clinician assessing different aspects of alliance in couple therapy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":"58 3","pages":"391-400"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000355","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The therapeutic alliance has gained status as a common factor in psychotherapy due to its robust predictive relationship with outcome. The current challenge in our field is to gain a more nuanced understanding of alliance's impact on the progress of treatment over the course of therapy. In the current study, alliance was measured on 3 dimensions: (a) the individual's as well as the couple's joint perception of alliance with the therapist ("self/group-therapist"), (b) each partner's perception of the alliance between the spouse and the therapist ("other-therapist"), and (c) the couple's assessment of alliance with each other ("within-system"). Based on self-reported data from 165 adult clients, we analyzed whether scores on these alliance dimensions at the beginning of therapy predicted the frequently measured outcomes on individual symptoms and relationship distress during treatment. We found that 2 of the alliance dimensions, the "self/group-therapist" and the "other-therapist," at the start of treatment predicted the slopes of the outcome measures. These findings add to established research suggesting that early establishment of alliance is an important predictor for progress during treatment. Variations in the results among the 3 alliance dimensions suggest the usefulness of the clinician assessing different aspects of alliance in couple therapy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联盟预测夫妻治疗的进展。
治疗联盟已经获得了地位,作为一个共同因素的心理治疗,由于其强大的预测关系与结果。目前我们领域的挑战是在治疗过程中对联盟对治疗进展的影响有更细致的了解。在目前的研究中,联盟是在三个维度上测量的:(a)个人以及夫妻对与治疗师联盟的共同感知(“自我/团体治疗师”),(b)每个伴侣对配偶与治疗师之间联盟的感知(“他者治疗师”),以及(c)夫妻对彼此联盟的评估(“系统内”)。基于165名成年客户的自我报告数据,我们分析了治疗开始时这些联盟维度的得分是否预测了治疗期间个人症状和关系困扰的频繁测量结果。我们发现,在治疗开始时,两个联盟维度,“自我/团体治疗师”和“他者治疗师”预测了结果测量的斜率。这些发现增加了已有的研究,表明早期建立联盟是治疗进展的重要预测指标。结果在三个联盟维度之间的差异表明临床医生在夫妻治疗中评估联盟的不同方面是有用的。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training publishes a wide variety of articles relevant to the field of psychotherapy. The journal strives to foster interactions among individuals involved with training, practice theory, and research since all areas are essential to psychotherapy. This journal is an invaluable resource for practicing clinical and counseling psychologists, social workers, and mental health professionals.
期刊最新文献
A cultural adaptation of acceptance and commitment therapy with exercise for older Chinese with chronic pain and depressive symptoms: A mixed-methods study. Toward a liberatory counseling and psychotherapy theories pedagogy and curriculum. Increasing outcome measurement precision: Network analysis of items on the Outcome Questionnaire-45. Physiological regulation processes differentiate the experience of ruptures between patient and therapist. Questioning the status quo: Latino community members as researchers in the study of health equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1