Ofra Kula, Reut Machluf Ruttner, Ben Shahar, David A Sbarra, Eran Bar-Kalifa
The primary proposed change process in emotion-focused therapy models for couples involves partners accessing and revealing vulnerable emotions and responding to such disclosures with empathy and compassion. Therapists often use enactments (guiding partners to communicate with each other directly) to facilitate this process. However, many therapists report lacking confidence and clarity in how best to facilitate enactments, and it remains understudied which therapist interventions within enactment episodes contribute to vulnerability sharing and responsiveness expression. This preregistered study examined the role of three interventions used during enactments-systemic meaning-making (narrating), emotional engagement (experiencing), and interaction guiding (choreographing) in promoting these processes. One hundred forty enactment events from 21 treatment couples were coded and analyzed. Trained raters coded therapists' interventions and partners' behaviors. In contrast to our hypothesis, systemic meaning-making and interaction guiding were not associated, and emotional engagement was only marginally associated with greater vulnerability expression. Interaction guiding was positively associated with responsiveness. However, systemic meaning-making was negatively associated with responsiveness, and emotional engagement was not associated with responsiveness. Vulnerability expression did not predict partner responsiveness. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring therapist interventions in enactments according to their distinct contributions to facilitating vulnerability and responsiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Guiding connections: The role of therapist interventions in facilitating couples' vulnerability and responsiveness in enactments.","authors":"Ofra Kula, Reut Machluf Ruttner, Ben Shahar, David A Sbarra, Eran Bar-Kalifa","doi":"10.1037/pst0000615","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000615","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The primary proposed change process in emotion-focused therapy models for couples involves partners accessing and revealing vulnerable emotions and responding to such disclosures with empathy and compassion. Therapists often use enactments (guiding partners to communicate with each other directly) to facilitate this process. However, many therapists report lacking confidence and clarity in how best to facilitate enactments, and it remains understudied which therapist interventions within enactment episodes contribute to vulnerability sharing and responsiveness expression. This preregistered study examined the role of three interventions used during enactments-systemic meaning-making (narrating), emotional engagement (experiencing), and interaction guiding (choreographing) in promoting these processes. One hundred forty enactment events from 21 treatment couples were coded and analyzed. Trained raters coded therapists' interventions and partners' behaviors. In contrast to our hypothesis, systemic meaning-making and interaction guiding were not associated, and emotional engagement was only marginally associated with greater vulnerability expression. Interaction guiding was positively associated with responsiveness. However, systemic meaning-making was negatively associated with responsiveness, and emotional engagement was not associated with responsiveness. Vulnerability expression did not predict partner responsiveness. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring therapist interventions in enactments according to their distinct contributions to facilitating vulnerability and responsiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146053497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Integrating spirituality and religiousness (S/R) into mental health (MH) treatment aligns with our ethics codes and professional guidelines, and it can promote therapeutic outcomes. There is emerging evidence among samples of professional clinicians and graduate students that the Spirituality Competency Training in MH curriculum (SCT-MH; Pearce et al., 2019) may address the dearth of training in this intersection. However, SCT-MH needs to be assessed among undergraduates to support vocational development and those who pursue graduate school or bachelor-level mental health work. In this exploratory pedagogical study, we used a series of repeated measures analyses of variance to assess undergraduate students' (N = 39) attitudes toward a revised version of the Attitudes subscale of the S/R integration into MH Scale (Oxhandler & Parrish, 2016), the Social Justice Scale (SJS; Torres-Harding et al., 2012), and single-item scales focused on pursuing MH-focused work postdegree across teaching-as-usual and SCT-MH curricula. During teaching-as-usual, there were no significant increases in attitude scores regarding S/R integration (p = .25) or SJS (p = .4). However, there were significant increases in attitudes toward S/R integration (p < .001) and SJS during the SCT-MH curriculum (p < .001). In neither arm did interest single-item scores on pursuing MH graduate school (p = .68) or vocationally (p = .05) increase. While not causal, these increases during SCT-MH regarding attitudes toward S/R MH integration and social justice attitudes and behaviors are noteworthy. Further extension using vocational assessment, longitudinal and experimental designs, and diverse multisite samples are needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Examining two pedagogical methods on attitudes toward religiousness within mental health and social justice in an undergraduate course.","authors":"Craig A Warlick, Calista A Spears","doi":"10.1037/pst0000613","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000613","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integrating spirituality and religiousness (S/R) into mental health (MH) treatment aligns with our ethics codes and professional guidelines, and it can promote therapeutic outcomes. There is emerging evidence among samples of professional clinicians and graduate students that the Spirituality Competency Training in MH curriculum (SCT-MH; Pearce et al., 2019) may address the dearth of training in this intersection. However, SCT-MH needs to be assessed among undergraduates to support vocational development and those who pursue graduate school or bachelor-level mental health work. In this exploratory pedagogical study, we used a series of repeated measures analyses of variance to assess undergraduate students' (<i>N</i> = 39) attitudes toward a revised version of the Attitudes subscale of the S/R integration into MH Scale (Oxhandler & Parrish, 2016), the Social Justice Scale (SJS; Torres-Harding et al., 2012), and single-item scales focused on pursuing MH-focused work postdegree across teaching-as-usual and SCT-MH curricula. During teaching-as-usual, there were no significant increases in attitude scores regarding S/R integration (<i>p</i> = .25) or SJS (<i>p</i> = .4). However, there were significant increases in attitudes toward S/R integration (<i>p</i> < .001) and SJS during the SCT-MH curriculum (<i>p</i> < .001). In neither arm did interest single-item scores on pursuing MH graduate school (<i>p</i> = .68) or vocationally (<i>p</i> = .05) increase. While not causal, these increases during SCT-MH regarding attitudes toward S/R MH integration and social justice attitudes and behaviors are noteworthy. Further extension using vocational assessment, longitudinal and experimental designs, and diverse multisite samples are needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146012132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Research does not consistently support the widely held assumption that therapist trainees' skills improve with supervised experience, leading to better client outcomes. The inconsistent findings are limited by methodological constraints. Measures of therapist trainee experience (e.g., training level, years since first client contact) fail to capture clinical experience accurately. Therefore, we operationalized therapist trainees' experience as the total hours of previous client contact under clinical supervision at the time of outcome assessment. We examined how therapist trainees' client contact hours (at the within-person level), client order, initial client distress, and treatment length are associated with client distress in the subsequent week. We used dynamic structural equation modeling to analyze longitudinal data with 1,125 outcome assessments from 192 clients and 45 doctoral-level therapist trainees, collected over 16 years. Therapists received weekly individual supervision and biweekly group supervision. Results indicated that at the within-person level, therapist trainee experience was modestly associated with reduced client distress, particularly for clients with higher initial distress. At the between-person level, therapist trainees' experience had a stronger impact on outcomes in shorter treatment lengths. Findings reveal the complexity of the therapist trainee experience-client outcome relationship and suggest that the effects of therapist trainee experience are contingent on other variables. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Therapist trainee experience and client outcome: A within-person analysis of hours of experience, client order, initial client distress, and treatment length.","authors":"Saadet Zumbul, Dennis M Kivlighan","doi":"10.1037/pst0000612","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000612","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research does not consistently support the widely held assumption that therapist trainees' skills improve with supervised experience, leading to better client outcomes. The inconsistent findings are limited by methodological constraints. Measures of therapist trainee experience (e.g., training level, years since first client contact) fail to capture clinical experience accurately. Therefore, we operationalized therapist trainees' experience as the total hours of previous client contact under clinical supervision at the time of outcome assessment. We examined how therapist trainees' client contact hours (at the within-person level), client order, initial client distress, and treatment length are associated with client distress in the subsequent week. We used dynamic structural equation modeling to analyze longitudinal data with 1,125 outcome assessments from 192 clients and 45 doctoral-level therapist trainees, collected over 16 years. Therapists received weekly individual supervision and biweekly group supervision. Results indicated that at the within-person level, therapist trainee experience was modestly associated with reduced client distress, particularly for clients with higher initial distress. At the between-person level, therapist trainees' experience had a stronger impact on outcomes in shorter treatment lengths. Findings reveal the complexity of the therapist trainee experience-client outcome relationship and suggest that the effects of therapist trainee experience are contingent on other variables. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145906564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mick Cooper, Tomasz Jankowski, David Saxon, Beata Zarzycka, Michael Barkham
The aim of this study was to investigate the degree of commonality between young people's perceptions of the alliance and the therapist interpersonal skills (TIS) of empathy, unconditional positive regard, and congruence. Participants were 152 young people (aged 13-16 years old; 114 female, 70 of minoritized ethnicities) who were experiencing moderate to severe levels of emotional symptoms and participated in up to 10 sessions of school-based humanistic counseling. At 6 weeks postrandomization, TIS and the alliance were assessed using the Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory: Form OS-40: T-S (Student Form, Version 3) and the Working Alliance Inventory Short Form, respectively. Structural equation modeling was used to identify latent constructs. A model with two correlated second-order factors and a hierarchical model with one third-order general factor exhibited the best data fit. The general factor, which we named youth-perceived relationship quality, explained a substantial amount of variance for TIS (81%) and alliance (98%). TIS and alliance effects, treated independently, explained an additional 3% and 1.4% of variance in satisfaction with care and psychological difficulties after therapy, respectively, as compared with general youth-perceived relationship quality. While therapeutic relationship factors-in clinical practice, training, and research-are often considered distinct, we found a high degree of commonality in how young people perceived the alliance and TIS. Further research is warranted on youth-perceived relationship quality as an integrated variable in youth psychotherapy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究的目的是探讨青少年对联盟的认知与治疗师的共情、无条件积极关注和一致性的人际关系技巧(TIS)之间的共性程度。参与者是152名年轻人(13-16岁;114名女性,70名少数民族),他们经历了中度至重度的情绪症状,并参加了多达10次以学校为基础的人文咨询。随机化后6周,分别使用巴雷特-伦纳德关系量表(OS-40表)、T-S(学生表,版本3)和工作联盟量表短表对TIS和联盟进行评估。使用结构方程模型识别潜在构念。具有两个相关二阶因子的模型和具有一个三阶一般因子的分层模型具有最佳的数据拟合效果。一般因素,我们称之为青年感知的关系质量,解释了TIS(81%)和联盟(98%)的大量方差。单独处理的TIS和联盟效应分别解释了治疗后护理满意度和心理困难差异的3%和1.4%,与一般青年感知的关系质量相比。虽然在临床实践、培训和研究中,治疗关系因素通常被认为是不同的,但我们发现年轻人对联盟和TIS的看法具有高度的共性。青少年感知的关系质量作为青少年心理治疗的一个综合变量,需要进一步的研究。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Young people's perceptions of therapist interpersonal skills and alliance: How distinct are they?","authors":"Mick Cooper, Tomasz Jankowski, David Saxon, Beata Zarzycka, Michael Barkham","doi":"10.1037/pst0000611","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000611","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the degree of commonality between young people's perceptions of the alliance and the therapist interpersonal skills (TIS) of empathy, unconditional positive regard, and congruence. Participants were 152 young people (aged 13-16 years old; 114 female, 70 of minoritized ethnicities) who were experiencing moderate to severe levels of emotional symptoms and participated in up to 10 sessions of school-based humanistic counseling. At 6 weeks postrandomization, TIS and the alliance were assessed using the Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory: Form OS-40: T-S (Student Form, Version 3) and the Working Alliance Inventory Short Form, respectively. Structural equation modeling was used to identify latent constructs. A model with two correlated second-order factors and a hierarchical model with one third-order general factor exhibited the best data fit. The general factor, which we named <i>youth-perceived relationship quality,</i> explained a substantial amount of variance for TIS (81%) and alliance (98%). TIS and alliance effects, treated independently, explained an additional 3% and 1.4% of variance in satisfaction with care and psychological difficulties after therapy, respectively, as compared with general youth-perceived relationship quality. While therapeutic relationship factors-in clinical practice, training, and research-are often considered distinct, we found a high degree of commonality in how young people perceived the alliance and TIS. Further research is warranted on youth-perceived relationship quality as an integrated variable in youth psychotherapy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Klára Jonášová, Michal Čevelíček, Petr Doležal, Benjamin Aas, Tomáš Řiháček
Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) has become an increasingly utilized tool in therapeutic practice that has the potential to improve therapy outcomes. This study aimed to synthesize the findings of existing qualitative studies investigating facilitators and barriers to clinicians' implementation of ROM in their practice. A systematic search of qualitative studies on clinicians' experience with the use of ROM in mental health services was conducted via APA PsycInfo, APA PsycArticles, Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Qualitative meta-analysis was used to synthesize the findings of the primary studies. Fifty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis resulted in 22 metacategories organized into five clusters: (a) perceived clinical relevance, (b) institutional aspects, (c) practical aspects, (d) client variables, and (e) clinicians' personal reactions. The meta-analysis revealed that the implementation of ROM into clinicians' psychotherapy practice is influenced by many factors, including practical circumstances such as the work environment, the clientele, and the chosen ROM system. Clinicians' attitude to ROM, its perceived usefulness, and their openness to receiving feedback on their work are also important variables. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
常规结果监测(ROM)已成为治疗实践中越来越多使用的工具,具有改善治疗结果的潜力。本研究旨在综合现有定性研究的结果,调查临床医生在实践中实施ROM的促进因素和障碍。通过APA PsycInfo、APA PsycArticles、Medline、Web of Science和Scopus数据库对临床医生在心理健康服务中使用ROM的经验进行了系统的定性研究。定性荟萃分析用于综合主要研究的结果。58项研究符合纳入标准。分析产生了22个元类别,分为五类:(a)感知临床相关性,(b)制度方面,(c)实践方面,(d)客户变量,(e)临床医生的个人反应。meta分析显示,临床医生在心理治疗实践中实施ROM受到许多因素的影响,包括实际情况,如工作环境、客户、所选择的ROM系统。临床医生对ROM的态度,其感知的有用性,以及他们接受工作反馈的开放性也是重要的变量。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators in the implementation of routine outcome monitoring from the clinicians' perspective: A qualitative meta-analysis.","authors":"Klára Jonášová, Michal Čevelíček, Petr Doležal, Benjamin Aas, Tomáš Řiháček","doi":"10.1037/pst0000605","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000605","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) has become an increasingly utilized tool in therapeutic practice that has the potential to improve therapy outcomes. This study aimed to synthesize the findings of existing qualitative studies investigating facilitators and barriers to clinicians' implementation of ROM in their practice. A systematic search of qualitative studies on clinicians' experience with the use of ROM in mental health services was conducted via APA PsycInfo, APA PsycArticles, Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Qualitative meta-analysis was used to synthesize the findings of the primary studies. Fifty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis resulted in 22 metacategories organized into five clusters: (a) perceived clinical relevance, (b) institutional aspects, (c) practical aspects, (d) client variables, and (e) clinicians' personal reactions. The meta-analysis revealed that the implementation of ROM into clinicians' psychotherapy practice is influenced by many factors, including practical circumstances such as the work environment, the clientele, and the chosen ROM system. Clinicians' attitude to ROM, its perceived usefulness, and their openness to receiving feedback on their work are also important variables. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744042","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study examined changes in emotion regulation difficulties during short-term dynamic psychotherapy and their temporal relationship with symptom change, considering attachment styles as potential moderators. Sixty-three patients with mild to moderate depression and/or anxiety underwent 16 weeks of supportive-expressive therapy. Emotion regulation difficulties, symptoms, and attachment styles were assessed using self-report measures. Contrary to hypotheses, no overall improvement in emotion regulation difficulties was observed. However, patients with high attachment avoidance showed increased emotional clarity, while those with anxious attachment demonstrated greater acceptance of negative emotions over time. A deterioration in emotion regulation strategies was observed across all patients, particularly among those with avoidant attachment. Cross-lagged panel analysis revealed complex temporal dynamics: bidirectional relationships between emotion regulation and symptoms during early sessions, decoupling in intermediate sessions, and unidirectional effects (regulation predicting symptoms) in late sessions. These findings highlight the complex phase-dependent dynamics of emotion regulation change in short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy. The results emphasize the importance of considering both treatment phase and attachment styles when addressing emotion regulation difficulties in therapy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究考察了短期动态心理治疗中情绪调节困难的变化及其与症状变化的时间关系,并认为依恋类型是潜在的调节因子。63例轻度至中度抑郁和/或焦虑患者接受了16周的支持表达治疗。情绪调节困难、症状和依恋类型采用自我报告方法进行评估。与假设相反,没有观察到情绪调节困难的整体改善。然而,高依恋回避的患者表现出更高的情绪清晰度,而焦虑型依恋的患者随着时间的推移表现出更大的负面情绪接受度。在所有患者中都观察到情绪调节策略的恶化,特别是在那些有逃避型依恋的患者中。交叉滞后面板分析揭示了复杂的时间动态:情绪调节与症状在早期阶段存在双向关系,在中期阶段存在解耦关系,在后期阶段存在单向效应(调节预测症状)。这些发现强调了短期心理动力治疗中情绪调节变化的复杂相依赖动力学。研究结果强调了在处理治疗中的情绪调节困难时同时考虑治疗阶段和依恋类型的重要性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Emotion regulation in short-term dynamic therapy: Attachment-moderated changes and bidirectional temporal associations with symptoms.","authors":"Gershom Gwertzman, Orya Tishby","doi":"10.1037/pst0000610","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000610","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined changes in emotion regulation difficulties during short-term dynamic psychotherapy and their temporal relationship with symptom change, considering attachment styles as potential moderators. Sixty-three patients with mild to moderate depression and/or anxiety underwent 16 weeks of supportive-expressive therapy. Emotion regulation difficulties, symptoms, and attachment styles were assessed using self-report measures. Contrary to hypotheses, no overall improvement in emotion regulation difficulties was observed. However, patients with high attachment avoidance showed increased emotional clarity, while those with anxious attachment demonstrated greater acceptance of negative emotions over time. A deterioration in emotion regulation strategies was observed across all patients, particularly among those with avoidant attachment. Cross-lagged panel analysis revealed complex temporal dynamics: bidirectional relationships between emotion regulation and symptoms during early sessions, decoupling in intermediate sessions, and unidirectional effects (regulation predicting symptoms) in late sessions. These findings highlight the complex phase-dependent dynamics of emotion regulation change in short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy. The results emphasize the importance of considering both treatment phase and attachment styles when addressing emotion regulation difficulties in therapy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145678494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-08-04DOI: 10.1037/pst0000597
Zishan Jiwani, Qiang Xie, John J Curtin, Kevin M Riordan, Robbie Babins-Wagner, Derek Caperton, Mindi N Thompson, Simon B Goldberg
Employment status, an essential socioeconomic factor, may be an important driver of disparities in mental health and access to treatment. However, prior research has been inconclusive and utilized broad employment categories. The present study investigated the associations between various types of employment status and baseline symptomology, psychotherapy engagement, and psychotherapy outcomes. We examined 27,258 patients (Mage = 32.54; 62.9% female; 75.8% White) who attended 115,936 psychotherapy sessions at a Canadian mental health agency between January 2014 and July 2022. Employment status was categorized into nine distinct groups (e.g., full-time, part-time, unemployed and looking for work, unemployed not looking for work, and retirement). Multilevel models examined the association between employment status and baseline symptoms, psychotherapy engagement (e.g., total sessions, early termination), and outcomes (e.g., symptom change). Patients who were unemployed (both looking for and not looking for work) reported higher baseline symptoms and increased odds of suicide concern compared to patients with full-time employment. Contrary to our preregistered hypotheses, patients who were unemployed attended more sessions and showed no significant differences in symptom change or trajectory of change compared to those employed full-time. Retirement was linked to lower baseline symptomology, and both retirement and full-time student status were associated with slower trajectories of change relative to full-time employment. Findings suggest that unemployment is associated with worse baseline mental health but does not hinder psychotherapy engagement and effectiveness. Ensuring accessibility of psychotherapy for unemployed individuals is crucial, given their heightened risk of psychological distress. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
就业状况是一个重要的社会经济因素,可能是心理健康和获得治疗方面存在差异的重要驱动因素。然而,先前的研究是不确定的,并且使用了广泛的就业类别。本研究调查了不同类型的就业状况与基线症状、心理治疗参与和心理治疗结果之间的关系。我们检查了27,258例患者(Mage = 32.54;62.9%的女性;75.8%白人),他们在2014年1月至2022年7月期间在加拿大一家心理健康机构参加了115936次心理治疗。就业状况被分为9个不同的群体(如全职、兼职、失业和找工作、失业不找工作和退休)。多层模型检验了就业状况与基线症状、心理治疗参与(如总疗程、早期终止)和结果(如症状改变)之间的关系。与有全职工作的患者相比,失业(包括找工作和不找工作)的患者报告的基线症状更高,自杀担忧的几率也更高。与我们预先登记的假设相反,失业的患者参加了更多的会议,与全职工作的患者相比,在症状变化或变化轨迹上没有显着差异。退休与较低的基线症状有关,退休和全日制学生身份都与相对于全职工作的较慢的变化轨迹有关。研究结果表明,失业与较差的基线心理健康有关,但并不妨碍心理治疗的参与和有效性。鉴于失业人员心理困扰的风险较高,确保他们获得心理治疗至关重要。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Is employment status associated with baseline symptoms, engagement, and outcomes in naturalistic psychotherapy? Evaluation in a large community mental health agency.","authors":"Zishan Jiwani, Qiang Xie, John J Curtin, Kevin M Riordan, Robbie Babins-Wagner, Derek Caperton, Mindi N Thompson, Simon B Goldberg","doi":"10.1037/pst0000597","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000597","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Employment status, an essential socioeconomic factor, may be an important driver of disparities in mental health and access to treatment. However, prior research has been inconclusive and utilized broad employment categories. The present study investigated the associations between various types of employment status and baseline symptomology, psychotherapy engagement, and psychotherapy outcomes. We examined 27,258 patients (<i>M</i>age = 32.54; 62.9% female; 75.8% White) who attended 115,936 psychotherapy sessions at a Canadian mental health agency between January 2014 and July 2022. Employment status was categorized into nine distinct groups (e.g., full-time, part-time, unemployed and looking for work, unemployed not looking for work, and retirement). Multilevel models examined the association between employment status and baseline symptoms, psychotherapy engagement (e.g., total sessions, early termination), and outcomes (e.g., symptom change). Patients who were unemployed (both looking for and not looking for work) reported higher baseline symptoms and increased odds of suicide concern compared to patients with full-time employment. Contrary to our preregistered hypotheses, patients who were unemployed attended more sessions and showed no significant differences in symptom change or trajectory of change compared to those employed full-time. Retirement was linked to lower baseline symptomology, and both retirement and full-time student status were associated with slower trajectories of change relative to full-time employment. Findings suggest that unemployment is associated with worse baseline mental health but does not hinder psychotherapy engagement and effectiveness. Ensuring accessibility of psychotherapy for unemployed individuals is crucial, given their heightened risk of psychological distress. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"495-508"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12327771/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144776059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-09DOI: 10.1037/pst0000606
Anuj H P Mehta, Michael J Constantino, Alice E Coyne, Averi N Gaines, Henny A Westra, Martin M Antony
Positive regard (PR)-rated from multiple perspectives across diverse psychotherapies-correlates positively with patient improvement. Yet, existing research has generally not parsed this total correlation into its within- and between-therapist components, which limits its interpretability. Thus, the present study explored (a) the association between positive regard and outcome at both the within- and between-therapist levels, (b) whether between-therapist differences in positive regard moderated the within-therapist positive regard-outcome association, and (c) whether treatment condition (cognitive-behavioral therapy [CBT] vs. CBT that integrated client-centered principles) moderated either level of the positive regard-outcome association. Adults with generalized anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to CBT alone (n = 49) or CBT integrated with motivational interviewing (MI-CBT; n = 52) to responsively address patient resistance (Westra et al., 2016). Ten therapists treated patients in CBT only, and nine distinct therapists treated patients in MI-CBT only. Patients rated therapist-offered positive regard repeatedly across 15 sessions and their worry and general distress outcomes at baseline and posttreatment. Multilevel structural equation modeling revealed a significant association between patients' experience of higher early treatment positive regard and lower posttreatment worry and general distress at the within-therapist level. There was no between-therapist association for either outcome. Additionally, neither between-therapist positive regard nor treatment condition moderated the within-therapist effect of positive regard on either outcome. Results underscore the value of therapists working to foster their patients' felt regard irrespective of the treatment they use or the general ability they have in cultivating this relational experience. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
积极关注(PR)-从不同心理治疗的多个角度评估-与患者的改善呈正相关。然而,现有的研究通常没有将这种整体相关性解析为治疗师内部和治疗师之间的成分,这限制了其可解释性。因此,本研究探讨了(a)治疗师内部和治疗师之间积极关注与结果之间的关联,(b)治疗师之间积极关注的差异是否调节了治疗师内部积极关注与结果之间的关联,以及(c)治疗条件(认知行为治疗[CBT]与整合客户中心原则的CBT)是否调节了积极关注与结果之间的关联。患有广广性焦虑症的成年人被随机分配到单独的CBT组(n = 49)或CBT结合动机性访谈组(MI-CBT; n = 52),以响应性地解决患者的抵抗(Westra et al., 2016)。10名治疗师仅以CBT治疗患者,9名不同的治疗师仅以MI-CBT治疗患者。患者在15个疗程中反复评价治疗师提供的积极关注,以及他们在基线和治疗后的担忧和一般痛苦结果。多层结构方程模型揭示了患者在治疗早期较高的积极关注与治疗后较低的担忧和一般痛苦之间的显著关联。两种结果均无治疗师间关联。此外,治疗师之间的积极关注和治疗条件都没有调节治疗师内部积极关注对任何结果的影响。结果强调了治疗师的价值,不管他们使用的治疗方法或他们在培养这种关系体验方面的一般能力如何,他们都在努力培养病人的感觉尊重。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Parsing the within- and between-therapist positive regard-outcome association in cognitive-behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder.","authors":"Anuj H P Mehta, Michael J Constantino, Alice E Coyne, Averi N Gaines, Henny A Westra, Martin M Antony","doi":"10.1037/pst0000606","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000606","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Positive regard (PR)-rated from multiple perspectives across diverse psychotherapies-correlates positively with patient improvement. Yet, existing research has generally not parsed this total correlation into its within- and between-therapist components, which limits its interpretability. Thus, the present study explored (a) the association between positive regard and outcome at both the within- and between-therapist levels, (b) whether between-therapist differences in positive regard moderated the within-therapist positive regard-outcome association, and (c) whether treatment condition (cognitive-behavioral therapy [CBT] vs. CBT that integrated client-centered principles) moderated either level of the positive regard-outcome association. Adults with generalized anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to CBT alone (<i>n</i> = 49) or CBT integrated with motivational interviewing (MI-CBT; <i>n</i> = 52) to responsively address patient resistance (Westra et al., 2016). Ten therapists treated patients in CBT only, and nine distinct therapists treated patients in MI-CBT only. Patients rated therapist-offered positive regard repeatedly across 15 sessions and their worry and general distress outcomes at baseline and posttreatment. Multilevel structural equation modeling revealed a significant association between patients' experience of higher early treatment positive regard and lower posttreatment worry and general distress at the within-therapist level. There was no between-therapist association for either outcome. Additionally, neither between-therapist positive regard nor treatment condition moderated the within-therapist effect of positive regard on either outcome. Results underscore the value of therapists working to foster their patients' felt regard irrespective of the treatment they use or the general ability they have in cultivating this relational experience. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"474-485"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145258886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-08-28DOI: 10.1037/pst0000598
Theodore T Bartholomew, Emma Smith, Andrés E Pérez-Rojas, Krista A Robbins, Eileen E Joy, Mukasa Mubirumusoke
Prior scholarship has helped demonstrate therapists' perceptions of the value of discussing anti-Black racism with Black clients in a manner that espouses cultural comfort or the ability to be at ease when discussing lived experiences related to clients' culture during treatment. Better understanding cultural comfort, an aspect of multicultural orientation, when discussing anti-Black racism with Black clients could help clarify paths by which psychotherapy does not perpetuate harm reflected in the dehumanization of such racism. However, Black clients' perspectives are missing in the literature. As such, we collected data from 153 Black participants with recent therapy experiences. They were asked about discussing anti-Black racism during therapy, satisfaction/helpfulness of these conversations, and items related to initiation and frequency of such discussions. Participants also completed measures of cultural comfort, working alliance, and perceived outcome. Perceived therapist cultural comfort did not significantly vary if anti-Black racism was discussed, and discussing anti-Black racism did not moderate the relationship between cultural comfort and working alliance or cultural comfort and outcome. Satisfaction and helpfulness positively correlated with cultural comfort. Cultural comfort scores also varied by who initiated these conversations and their frequency. We contextualize these findings in a need for greater nuance with respect to examining discussions of racism in psychotherapy and consider our findings with respect to broaching literature. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
先前的学术研究已经帮助证明了治疗师对与黑人来访者讨论反黑人种族主义的价值的看法,这种方式支持文化舒适,或者在治疗期间讨论与来访者文化相关的生活经历时能够轻松自在。在与黑人来访者讨论反黑人种族主义时,更好地理解文化舒适,这是多元文化取向的一个方面,可以帮助明确心理治疗不会使这种种族主义的非人性化所反映的伤害永久化的途径。然而,黑人客户的观点在文献中缺失。因此,我们收集了153名最近接受过治疗的黑人参与者的数据。他们被问及在治疗期间讨论反黑人种族主义,这些谈话的满意度/有用性,以及与此类讨论的开始和频率相关的项目。参与者还完成了文化舒适度、工作联盟和感知结果的测量。当讨论反黑人种族主义时,感知治疗师的文化舒适度没有显著差异,讨论反黑人种族主义并没有调节文化舒适度与工作联盟或文化舒适度与结果的关系。满意度、乐于助人与文化舒适度正相关。文化舒适度得分也因对话发起者和频率而异。我们将这些发现置于需要更细微差别的背景中,以检查心理治疗中的种族主义讨论,并将我们的发现与讨论文献相结合。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Black clients' perceptions of therapists' cultural comfort, alliance, and outcome and the discussion of anti-Black racism in psychotherapy.","authors":"Theodore T Bartholomew, Emma Smith, Andrés E Pérez-Rojas, Krista A Robbins, Eileen E Joy, Mukasa Mubirumusoke","doi":"10.1037/pst0000598","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000598","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior scholarship has helped demonstrate therapists' perceptions of the value of discussing anti-Black racism with Black clients in a manner that espouses cultural comfort or the ability to be at ease when discussing lived experiences related to clients' culture during treatment. Better understanding cultural comfort, an aspect of multicultural orientation, when discussing anti-Black racism with Black clients could help clarify paths by which psychotherapy does not perpetuate harm reflected in the dehumanization of such racism. However, Black clients' perspectives are missing in the literature. As such, we collected data from 153 Black participants with recent therapy experiences. They were asked about discussing anti-Black racism during therapy, satisfaction/helpfulness of these conversations, and items related to initiation and frequency of such discussions. Participants also completed measures of cultural comfort, working alliance, and perceived outcome. Perceived therapist cultural comfort did not significantly vary if anti-Black racism was discussed, and discussing anti-Black racism did not moderate the relationship between cultural comfort and working alliance or cultural comfort and outcome. Satisfaction and helpfulness positively correlated with cultural comfort. Cultural comfort scores also varied by who initiated these conversations and their frequency. We contextualize these findings in a need for greater nuance with respect to examining discussions of racism in psychotherapy and consider our findings with respect to broaching literature. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"529-536"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144966487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-07-31DOI: 10.1037/pst0000591
Michael J Constantino, Averi N Gaines, Alice E Coyne, Henricus L Van, Anuj H P Mehta, Jaap Peen, Frank J Don, Jack J M Dekker, Ellen Driessen
Abundant research across various treatments indicates that therapists can differ in their general, caseload-level effectiveness. However, relatively little is known about therapist factors that predict such "performance" variability. Moreover, most of the limited existing work on this topic has relied on demographic and professional convenience variables, which have demonstrated low predictive power. Thus, it is possible that therapist effectiveness differences would be better explained by personality characteristics that are inescapably present in a clinician's work. Addressing this question, the present preregistered study preliminarily explored whether more versus less effective therapists possess more adaptive personality traits among the "big five," defense style maturity, and psychological mindedness. Data were derived from a randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of 16 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy and psychodynamic therapy for depression (Driessen et al., 2013). Effective sample participants were 142 adult outpatients treated by 32 therapists nested within the treatment condition. Therapists completed multiple personality measures, and patients' depression and global distress symptoms were assessed (via self-report or observer ratings) at baseline and posttreatment. Despite there being significant between-therapist effectiveness differences (on their average patient's posttreatment outcome), multilevel models revealed no significant associations between personality characteristics and such differences on any outcome. It may be that therapists' overall effectiveness has more to do with their transferable actions in the room versus traits they bring into their work. Alternatively, certain traits may predict between-therapist effects but only in specific treatment, patient, and/or cultural contexts that differ from the ones herein. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
对各种治疗方法的大量研究表明,治疗师在一般情况下的工作量水平上的有效性可能有所不同。然而,对预测这种“表现”可变性的治疗师因素所知相对较少。此外,关于该主题的大多数有限的现有工作都依赖于人口统计和专业便利变量,这些变量显示出较低的预测能力。因此,临床医生工作中不可避免地存在的人格特征可能会更好地解释治疗师有效性的差异。针对这一问题,本预注册研究初步探讨了在“五大”、防御风格成熟度和心理心态中,更有效的治疗师与更不有效的治疗师是否具有更多的适应性人格特征。数据来源于一项随机临床试验,比较了16次认知行为疗法和心理动力疗法对抑郁症的疗效(Driessen et al., 2013)。有效样本参与者为142名成年门诊患者,由32名治疗师在治疗条件内嵌套治疗。治疗师完成多重人格测量,并在基线和治疗后评估患者的抑郁和整体困扰症状(通过自我报告或观察者评分)。尽管治疗师之间存在显著的有效性差异(在他们的平均患者治疗后结果上),但多层次模型显示人格特征与任何结果的差异之间没有显著的关联。也许,治疗师的整体有效性更多地与他们在房间里的可转移行为有关,而不是他们在工作中带来的特质。或者,某些特征可以预测治疗师之间的效果,但仅在特定的治疗、患者和/或与本文不同的文化背景下。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Therapist personality factors as predictors of between-therapist effectiveness differences.","authors":"Michael J Constantino, Averi N Gaines, Alice E Coyne, Henricus L Van, Anuj H P Mehta, Jaap Peen, Frank J Don, Jack J M Dekker, Ellen Driessen","doi":"10.1037/pst0000591","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000591","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abundant research across various treatments indicates that therapists can differ in their general, caseload-level effectiveness. However, relatively little is known about therapist factors that predict such \"performance\" variability. Moreover, most of the limited existing work on this topic has relied on demographic and professional convenience variables, which have demonstrated low predictive power. Thus, it is possible that therapist effectiveness differences would be better explained by personality characteristics that are inescapably present in a clinician's work. Addressing this question, the present preregistered study preliminarily explored whether more versus less effective therapists possess more adaptive personality traits among the \"big five,\" defense style maturity, and psychological mindedness. Data were derived from a randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of 16 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy and psychodynamic therapy for depression (Driessen et al., 2013). Effective sample participants were 142 adult outpatients treated by 32 therapists nested within the treatment condition. Therapists completed multiple personality measures, and patients' depression and global distress symptoms were assessed (via self-report or observer ratings) at baseline and posttreatment. Despite there being significant between-therapist effectiveness differences (on their average patient's posttreatment outcome), multilevel models revealed no significant associations between personality characteristics and such differences on any outcome. It may be that therapists' overall effectiveness has more to do with their transferable actions <i>in the room</i> versus traits they bring into their work. Alternatively, certain traits may predict between-therapist effects but only in specific treatment, patient, and/or cultural contexts that differ from the ones herein. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"509-517"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144761147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}