Quality of communicating design features for cobalt chromium removable partial dentures in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Oral Research Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.26650/eor.20200117
Mohammad Zakaria Nassani, Mazen Saeed AlOtaibi
{"title":"Quality of communicating design features for cobalt chromium removable partial dentures in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Mohammad Zakaria Nassani,&nbsp;Mazen Saeed AlOtaibi","doi":"10.26650/eor.20200117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This survey aimed to investigate quality of communicating design features for the construction of cobalt chromium removable partial dentures (RPDs) among dentists in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A survey of nine commercial dental laboratories located in Riyadh was carried out. In each visit, master casts for cobalt chromium RPDs and dentists' prescriptions were examined. A quality score for the provided instructions was developed and ranged from 0 to 4. A zero score means that no instructions were sent from the dentist for the design of the RPD. A score of 4 means that instructions were provided for the design of four main elements of the RPD, i.e., shape of major connector, type of direct retainers, position of direct retainers, position of dental rests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>162 dentists' prescriptions for RPDs and related casts were assessed. The majority of RPD cases were designed by the dental technician alone (64.2%). Shape of the major connector was the most frequent element in dentists' prescriptions (35.8%). The mean quality score of dentists' instructions was 0.96 (sd=1.54). 18% of the provided instructions achieved quality score equal to 4. Prescriptions for Kennedy Class III cases achieved significantly higher mean quality score compared to Kennedy Class II cases (p<0.05). 16.7% of the evaluated casts had clearly defined rest seat preparation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this survey indicate inadequate quality of communicating the design features of cobalt chromium RPDs among practicing dentists in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The reliance on the dental technician to design the cast RPDs seems to be high.</p>","PeriodicalId":41993,"journal":{"name":"European Oral Research","volume":"54 3","pages":"123-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a5/cc/eor-054-123.PMC7837710.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20200117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: This survey aimed to investigate quality of communicating design features for the construction of cobalt chromium removable partial dentures (RPDs) among dentists in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Materials and methods: A survey of nine commercial dental laboratories located in Riyadh was carried out. In each visit, master casts for cobalt chromium RPDs and dentists' prescriptions were examined. A quality score for the provided instructions was developed and ranged from 0 to 4. A zero score means that no instructions were sent from the dentist for the design of the RPD. A score of 4 means that instructions were provided for the design of four main elements of the RPD, i.e., shape of major connector, type of direct retainers, position of direct retainers, position of dental rests.

Results: 162 dentists' prescriptions for RPDs and related casts were assessed. The majority of RPD cases were designed by the dental technician alone (64.2%). Shape of the major connector was the most frequent element in dentists' prescriptions (35.8%). The mean quality score of dentists' instructions was 0.96 (sd=1.54). 18% of the provided instructions achieved quality score equal to 4. Prescriptions for Kennedy Class III cases achieved significantly higher mean quality score compared to Kennedy Class II cases (p<0.05). 16.7% of the evaluated casts had clearly defined rest seat preparation.

Conclusion: The results of this survey indicate inadequate quality of communicating the design features of cobalt chromium RPDs among practicing dentists in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The reliance on the dental technician to design the cast RPDs seems to be high.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在沙特阿拉伯利雅得,钴铬可拆卸局部义齿的沟通设计特征的质量。
目的:本调查旨在调查沙特阿拉伯利雅得牙医对钴铬可摘局部义齿(rpd)结构设计特征的沟通质量。材料和方法:对位于利雅得的九个商业牙科实验室进行了调查。在每次访问中,检查钴铬rpd的主铸件和牙医处方。为所提供的指导制定了一个质量评分,范围从0到4。0分意味着牙医没有给RPD的设计指示。得分为4分表示为RPD的四个主要元素的设计提供了说明,即主连接器的形状,直接固位器的类型,直接固位器的位置,牙托的位置。结果:对162名牙医的rpd处方及相关铸型进行评估。大多数RPD病例是由牙科技师单独设计的(64.2%)。主要接插件的形状是牙医处方中最常见的因素(35.8%)。牙医说明书质量评分平均为0.96分(sd=1.54)。提供的指导中有18%达到了4分的质量分数。Kennedy III类病例的处方平均质量得分明显高于Kennedy II类病例(p结论:本调查结果表明,沙特阿拉伯利雅得执业牙医对钴铬rpd设计特点的沟通质量不足。对牙科技师设计铸造rpd的依赖似乎很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Oral Research
European Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biocompatibility of different resin composites after polymerization with two light curing units: an immunohistochemical study. Prophylactic and therapeutic effects of (6)-shogaol on alveolar bone loss in experimental periodontitis. Comparative evaluation of digital radiography, electronic apex locator and simultaneous working length determination on postoperative pain after root canal treatment: a randomized clinical trial Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of c-shaped canal morphology in mandibular premolar teeth The effect of three different primary teeth rotary instrument systems on the amount of apically extruded debris in pulpectomy of primary teeth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1