Summary of adverse drug events for hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and chloroquine during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of the American Pharmacists Association Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.japh.2021.01.007
Daniel G. Dauner, Kim Nichols Dauner
{"title":"Summary of adverse drug events for hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and chloroquine during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Daniel G. Dauner,&nbsp;Kim Nichols Dauner","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2021.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>Given the increased use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), </span>chloroquine<span><span> (CQ), and azithromycin (AZM) during the early months of the </span>coronavirus disease 2019<span> (COVID-19) pandemic, there is a need to evaluate the associated safety concerns. The objective of this study was to summarize the adverse drug events (ADEs) associated with HCQ, CQ, and AZM use during the national COVID-19 emergency and compare the results with known adverse reactions listed in the drugs’ package inserts.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>A cross-sectional study design was used. The publicly available Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System quarterly data extract files from January 1, 2020 to June 30, 2020 were downloaded. A disproportionality analysis was conducted using the proportional reporting ratio to identify possible ADE signals. A Poisson regression was used to assess if the number of ADE reports for the 3 </span>drugs increased over time.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a statistically significant increasing trend in the reported ADEs for both HCQ (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and AZM (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Before the declaration of the national emergency, there were 592 reported drug-ADE pairs for the 3 drugs compared with 2492 drug-ADE pairs reported after March 13, 2020. These 2492 drug-ADE pairs represented 848 ADEs across the 3 drugs, of which 114 (13.4%) were identified as potential signals including 55 (48.2%) that were not listed in the prescribing information.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our results showed that the reported ADEs for HCQ and AZM have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Differences were observed in both the type of and frequency of the highest reported ADEs for the 3 selected drugs before and after the national emergency declaration. Although causation cannot be determined from ADE reports, further investigation of some reports may be warranted. Our results highlight the need for pharmacovigilance<span> and education of health care<span> professionals on the safety of these drugs when being used for COVID-19 prophylaxis or treatment.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":"61 3","pages":"Pages 293-298"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.japh.2021.01.007","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S154431912100008X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective

Given the increased use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), chloroquine (CQ), and azithromycin (AZM) during the early months of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there is a need to evaluate the associated safety concerns. The objective of this study was to summarize the adverse drug events (ADEs) associated with HCQ, CQ, and AZM use during the national COVID-19 emergency and compare the results with known adverse reactions listed in the drugs’ package inserts.

Methods

A cross-sectional study design was used. The publicly available Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System quarterly data extract files from January 1, 2020 to June 30, 2020 were downloaded. A disproportionality analysis was conducted using the proportional reporting ratio to identify possible ADE signals. A Poisson regression was used to assess if the number of ADE reports for the 3 drugs increased over time.

Results

There was a statistically significant increasing trend in the reported ADEs for both HCQ (P < 0.001) and AZM (P < 0.001). Before the declaration of the national emergency, there were 592 reported drug-ADE pairs for the 3 drugs compared with 2492 drug-ADE pairs reported after March 13, 2020. These 2492 drug-ADE pairs represented 848 ADEs across the 3 drugs, of which 114 (13.4%) were identified as potential signals including 55 (48.2%) that were not listed in the prescribing information.

Conclusions

Our results showed that the reported ADEs for HCQ and AZM have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Differences were observed in both the type of and frequency of the highest reported ADEs for the 3 selected drugs before and after the national emergency declaration. Although causation cannot be determined from ADE reports, further investigation of some reports may be warranted. Our results highlight the need for pharmacovigilance and education of health care professionals on the safety of these drugs when being used for COVID-19 prophylaxis or treatment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行期间羟氯喹、阿奇霉素和氯喹药物不良事件综述
鉴于在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的最初几个月羟氯喹(HCQ)、氯喹(CQ)和阿奇霉素(AZM)的使用增加,有必要评估相关的安全性问题。本研究的目的是总结在全国COVID-19紧急情况下与使用HCQ、CQ和AZM相关的药物不良事件(ADEs),并将结果与药品说明书中列出的已知不良反应进行比较。方法采用横断面研究设计。下载2020年1月1日至2020年6月30日公开的美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统季度数据摘录文件。使用比例报告比率进行歧化分析以识别可能的ADE信号。使用泊松回归来评估3种药物的ADE报告数量是否随时间增加。结果HCQ (P <0.001)和AZM (P <0.001)。在宣布国家紧急状态前,这3种药物报告的药物ade对为592对,而2020年3月13日之后报告的药物ade对为2492对。这2492对药物- ade对代表了3种药物的848个ade,其中114个(13.4%)被确定为潜在信号,其中55个(48.2%)未在处方信息中列出。结论2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,HCQ和AZM的ade报告呈上升趋势。在国家紧急状态宣布前后,所选3种药物的最高ade报告类型和频率均存在差异。虽然不能从ADE报告中确定因果关系,但对一些报告的进一步调查可能是有必要的。我们的研究结果强调了在使用这些药物进行COVID-19预防或治疗时,需要对卫生保健专业人员进行药物警戒和安全性教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
336
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Pharmacists Association is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), providing information on pharmaceutical care, drug therapy, diseases and other health issues, trends in pharmacy practice and therapeutics, informed opinion, and original research. JAPhA publishes original research, reviews, experiences, and opinion articles that link science to contemporary pharmacy practice to improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of different intervention models to decrease no-show rates of embedded pharmacy visits. Cannabis at a Crossroads: Pharmacist Care Considerations in the Context of a Changing Cannabis Regulatory Landscape. Impact of a Targeted Recruitment Approach for a Medication Adherence Packaging Program. Over-the-counter naloxone availability: Insights from rural community pharmacists in the Southern US. Implementation of a multi-dose ophthalmic medication policy change at a large health system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1