Perioperative Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesic Efficacy of Morphine with Combined Nefopam and Parecoxib versus Parecoxib in Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study.

IF 1.3 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2021-02-12 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/5461890
Varinee Lekprasert, Lapuskorn Yapanan, Wichai Ittichaikulthol, Rungrawan Buachai, Phimol Soisod, Areepan Sophonsritsuk
{"title":"Perioperative Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesic Efficacy of Morphine with Combined Nefopam and Parecoxib versus Parecoxib in Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study.","authors":"Varinee Lekprasert,&nbsp;Lapuskorn Yapanan,&nbsp;Wichai Ittichaikulthol,&nbsp;Rungrawan Buachai,&nbsp;Phimol Soisod,&nbsp;Areepan Sophonsritsuk","doi":"10.1155/2021/5461890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nefopam is a non-NSAIDs and opioid sparing centrally acting drug which is effective for a multimodal postoperative analgesia. The present study aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of nefopam combined with parecoxib for gynecologic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized double-blinded control trial recruited participants (<i>n</i> = 72) who underwent gynecologic surgeries and divided them into either a nefopam or control group. The study group received parecoxib 40 mg plus nefopam 20 mg, while the control group received parecoxib 40 mg plus normal saline solution intravenously during open abdominal gynecological surgery. Both groups then received either nefopam or normal saline every 6 hours postoperatively for 24 hours. Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine was given for breakthrough pain within 24 h. The participants were evaluated for morphine consumption within 24 hours and postoperative pain using a verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) at a postanesthetic care unit, at 6-, 12-, and 24-hour postoperative periods. Adverse effects were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Morphine consumption within 24 hours and adverse effects were not significantly different between both groups. Mean difference and 95% confident interval of morphine consumption between both groups was 1.00 (-4.56, 4.76), <i>P</i>=0.97. The VNRS on movement at 6 hours after surgery of the nefopam group was significantly different from that of the control group [mean (SD), 4.14 (2.11) vs. 5.14 (1.80), <i>P</i>=0.04]. The VNRS of the nefopam group at 12 hours after operation during resting and on movement was significantly different from that of the control group ([mean (SD), 1.47 (1.80) vs. 2.54 (2.15), <i>P</i>=0.03], [mean (SD), 3.22 (1.84) vs 4.17 (1.74), <i>P</i>=0.03]), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combined administration of nefopam and parecoxib during gynecologic surgery slightly reduced the VNRS at 6 and 12 hours postoperatively more than treatment with parecoxib.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":"2021 ","pages":"5461890"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7895606/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5461890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Nefopam is a non-NSAIDs and opioid sparing centrally acting drug which is effective for a multimodal postoperative analgesia. The present study aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of nefopam combined with parecoxib for gynecologic surgery.

Methods: This randomized double-blinded control trial recruited participants (n = 72) who underwent gynecologic surgeries and divided them into either a nefopam or control group. The study group received parecoxib 40 mg plus nefopam 20 mg, while the control group received parecoxib 40 mg plus normal saline solution intravenously during open abdominal gynecological surgery. Both groups then received either nefopam or normal saline every 6 hours postoperatively for 24 hours. Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine was given for breakthrough pain within 24 h. The participants were evaluated for morphine consumption within 24 hours and postoperative pain using a verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) at a postanesthetic care unit, at 6-, 12-, and 24-hour postoperative periods. Adverse effects were recorded.

Results: Morphine consumption within 24 hours and adverse effects were not significantly different between both groups. Mean difference and 95% confident interval of morphine consumption between both groups was 1.00 (-4.56, 4.76), P=0.97. The VNRS on movement at 6 hours after surgery of the nefopam group was significantly different from that of the control group [mean (SD), 4.14 (2.11) vs. 5.14 (1.80), P=0.04]. The VNRS of the nefopam group at 12 hours after operation during resting and on movement was significantly different from that of the control group ([mean (SD), 1.47 (1.80) vs. 2.54 (2.15), P=0.03], [mean (SD), 3.22 (1.84) vs 4.17 (1.74), P=0.03]), respectively.

Conclusions: The combined administration of nefopam and parecoxib during gynecologic surgery slightly reduced the VNRS at 6 and 12 hours postoperatively more than treatment with parecoxib.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇科手术围手术期静脉注射吗啡联合奈福泮和帕瑞考西与帕瑞考西的自控镇痛效果:一项随机双盲研究。
背景:奈福泮是一种非非甾体抗炎药和阿片类药物保留中枢作用药物,可用于多模式术后镇痛。本研究旨在评价奈福泮联合帕瑞昔布用于妇科手术的镇痛效果。方法:这项随机双盲对照试验招募了72名接受妇科手术的患者,并将其分为尼福泮组和对照组。研究组在妇科开腹手术中静脉给予帕瑞昔布40 mg +尼福泮20 mg,对照组给予帕瑞昔布40 mg +生理盐水。两组术后每隔6小时给予尼福泮或生理盐水治疗,持续24小时。突破性疼痛在24 h内给予吗啡静脉自控镇痛。在术后护理单元,分别于术后6、12和24小时使用口头数字评定量表(VNRS)评估参与者24小时内吗啡用量和术后疼痛。记录不良反应。结果:两组患者24h内吗啡用量及不良反应无显著性差异。两组吗啡用量的平均差异和95%可信区间为1.00 (-4.56,4.76),P=0.97。nefopam组术后6 h运动VNRS与对照组比较差异有统计学意义[mean (SD), 4.14 (2.11) vs. 5.14 (1.80), P=0.04]。nefopam组术后12 h静息和运动时VNRS与对照组比较差异有统计学意义([mean (SD), 1.47 (1.80) vs 2.54 (2.15), P=0.03], [mean (SD), 3.22 (1.84) vs 4.17 (1.74), P=0.03])。结论:妇科手术中联合应用奈福帕泮和帕瑞昔布比单用帕瑞昔布更能降低术后6和12小时的VNRS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analgesic Efficacy of Epidural Neuroplasty via Racz Catheter During Lumbar Fixation In Situ for Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Comparison of Adverse Reactions Between Remimazolam and Propofol in Hysteroscopic Surgery in Mainland China: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Association Between Serum Anion Gap and Risk of Postoperative Delirium in Patients Undergoing Gastric Surgery in ICU: A Retrospective Study From the MIMIC-IV Database. Simulation-Based Comparison of Standard Versus Rotational Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion Techniques in Novice Anesthesiologists: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial. A Systematic Review of Temporary Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Postoperative Pain Management in Orthopedic Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1