A practical guide to the systematic application of nominal group technique.

IF 1 Q3 NURSING Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2021-03-11 Epub Date: 2021-02-25 DOI:10.7748/nr.2021.e1777
Rosemary Mullen, Angela Kydd, Anne Fleming, Laura McMillan
{"title":"A practical guide to the systematic application of nominal group technique.","authors":"Rosemary Mullen,&nbsp;Angela Kydd,&nbsp;Anne Fleming,&nbsp;Laura McMillan","doi":"10.7748/nr.2021.e1777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nominal group technique (NGT) is a highly structured, commonly used way of exploring areas of interest and developing consensus. However, it is sometimes conflated with focus group methods.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To provide a rationale for selecting NGT as a research method and to examine its systematic application in a doctoral Q-methodology study exploring nursing students' perspectives of preserving dignity in care.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>An outline of NGT is provided, and it is distinguished from focus group methods. As well as providing a step-by-step guide to using NGT, each step is illustrated with its practical application in the study, and the lessons learned concerning the limitations and strengths of NGT in the context of one study are shared.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When applied systematically, NGT enables nurse researchers to collaborate in a meaningful and engaging way with participants and generate tangible outcomes relatively quickly.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>This paper offers practical insight into the use of NGT to explore perceptions and develop consensus.</p>","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":"29 1","pages":"14-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2021.e1777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: Nominal group technique (NGT) is a highly structured, commonly used way of exploring areas of interest and developing consensus. However, it is sometimes conflated with focus group methods.

Aim: To provide a rationale for selecting NGT as a research method and to examine its systematic application in a doctoral Q-methodology study exploring nursing students' perspectives of preserving dignity in care.

Discussion: An outline of NGT is provided, and it is distinguished from focus group methods. As well as providing a step-by-step guide to using NGT, each step is illustrated with its practical application in the study, and the lessons learned concerning the limitations and strengths of NGT in the context of one study are shared.

Conclusion: When applied systematically, NGT enables nurse researchers to collaborate in a meaningful and engaging way with participants and generate tangible outcomes relatively quickly.

Implications for practice: This paper offers practical insight into the use of NGT to explore perceptions and develop consensus.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个实用的指南系统应用的名义团体技术。
背景:名义群体技术(NGT)是一种高度结构化的、常用的探索感兴趣领域和发展共识的方法。然而,它有时与焦点小组方法相混淆。目的:提供选择NGT作为研究方法的基本原理,并检查其在博士q -方法论研究中的系统应用,探索护理学生在护理中维护尊严的观点。讨论:提供了NGT的概述,它与焦点小组方法有所区别。除了提供使用NGT的分步指南外,每一步都说明了它在研究中的实际应用,并分享了在一项研究背景下关于NGT的局限性和优势的经验教训。结论:当系统应用时,NGT使护理研究人员能够以有意义和参与的方式与参与者合作,并相对快速地产生切实的结果。对实践的启示:本文为使用NGT来探索认知和发展共识提供了实践见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Researcher
Nurse Researcher NURSING-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Additionally, the website provides a range of Internet links to the latest research news, conference information, jobs and grants, and other resources. We hope that this site becomes an invaluable interactive resource for both novice and experienced researchers. If you have any comments or suggestions to improve the site, or details of additional websites that could be usefully added, please let us know. We very much welcome your ideas so that we can provide the kind of online resource that will best help you to develop your research.
期刊最新文献
Recognising vicarious trauma in research: the experiences of researchers who work with victimisation data and the support they need. Sex workers and their stories: using timelines as a creative method in research involving underserved populations. Exploring the application and significance of case study research in nursing. How nurse researchers can use stepped-wedge design and analysis. Building inclusive research cultures in nursing - getting ready for the Research Excellence Framework 2029.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1