Kinematic and Injury Response of Reclined PMHS in Frontal Impacts.

Q2 Medicine Stapp car crash journal Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI:10.4271/2020-22-0004
Rachel Richardson, John-Paul Donlon, Mohan Jayathirtha, Jason L Forman, Greg Shaw, Bronislaw Gepner, Jason R Kerrigan, Martin Östling, Krystoffer Mroz, Bengt Pipkorn
{"title":"Kinematic and Injury Response of Reclined PMHS in Frontal Impacts.","authors":"Rachel Richardson,&nbsp;John-Paul Donlon,&nbsp;Mohan Jayathirtha,&nbsp;Jason L Forman,&nbsp;Greg Shaw,&nbsp;Bronislaw Gepner,&nbsp;Jason R Kerrigan,&nbsp;Martin Östling,&nbsp;Krystoffer Mroz,&nbsp;Bengt Pipkorn","doi":"10.4271/2020-22-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Frontal impacts with reclined occupants are rare but severe, and they are anticipated to become more common with the introduction of vehicles with automated driving capabilities. Computational and physical human surrogates are needed to design and evaluate injury countermeasures for reclined occupants, but the validity of such surrogates in a reclined posture is unknown. Experiments with post-mortem human subjects (PMHS) in a recline posture are needed both to define biofidelity targets for other surrogates and to describe the biomechanical response of reclined occupants in restrained frontal impacts. The goal of this study was to evaluate the kinematic and injury response of reclined PMHS in 30 g, 50 km/h frontal sled tests. Five midsize adult male PMHS were tested. A simplified semi-rigid seat with an anti-submarining pan and a non-production threepoint seatbelt (pre-tensioned, force-limited, seat-integrated) were used. Global motions and local accelerations of the head, pelvis, and multiple vertebrae were measured. Seat and seatbelt forces were also measured. Injuries were assessed via post-test dissection. The initial reclined posture aligned body regions (pelvis, lumbar spine, and ribcage) in a way that reduced the likelihood of effective restraint by the seat and seatbelt: the occupant's pelvis was initially rotated posteriorly, priming the occupant for submarining, and the lumbar spine was loaded in combined compression and bending due to the inertia of the upper torso during forward excursion. Coupled with the high restraining forces of the seat and seatbelt, the unfavorable kinematics resulted in injuries of the sacrum/coccyx (four of five PMHS injured), iliac wing (two of five PMHS injured), lumbar spine (three of five PMHS injured), and ribcage (all five PMHS suffered sternal fractures, and three of five PMHS suffered seven or more rib fractures). The kinematic and injury outcomes strongly motivate the development of injury criteria for the lumbar spine and pelvis, the inclusion of intrinsic variability (e.g., abdomen depth and pelvis shape) in computational simulations of frontal impacts with reclined occupants, and the adaptation of comprehensive restraint paradigms to predicted variability of occupant posture.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"64 ","pages":"83-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stapp car crash journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-22-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Frontal impacts with reclined occupants are rare but severe, and they are anticipated to become more common with the introduction of vehicles with automated driving capabilities. Computational and physical human surrogates are needed to design and evaluate injury countermeasures for reclined occupants, but the validity of such surrogates in a reclined posture is unknown. Experiments with post-mortem human subjects (PMHS) in a recline posture are needed both to define biofidelity targets for other surrogates and to describe the biomechanical response of reclined occupants in restrained frontal impacts. The goal of this study was to evaluate the kinematic and injury response of reclined PMHS in 30 g, 50 km/h frontal sled tests. Five midsize adult male PMHS were tested. A simplified semi-rigid seat with an anti-submarining pan and a non-production threepoint seatbelt (pre-tensioned, force-limited, seat-integrated) were used. Global motions and local accelerations of the head, pelvis, and multiple vertebrae were measured. Seat and seatbelt forces were also measured. Injuries were assessed via post-test dissection. The initial reclined posture aligned body regions (pelvis, lumbar spine, and ribcage) in a way that reduced the likelihood of effective restraint by the seat and seatbelt: the occupant's pelvis was initially rotated posteriorly, priming the occupant for submarining, and the lumbar spine was loaded in combined compression and bending due to the inertia of the upper torso during forward excursion. Coupled with the high restraining forces of the seat and seatbelt, the unfavorable kinematics resulted in injuries of the sacrum/coccyx (four of five PMHS injured), iliac wing (two of five PMHS injured), lumbar spine (three of five PMHS injured), and ribcage (all five PMHS suffered sternal fractures, and three of five PMHS suffered seven or more rib fractures). The kinematic and injury outcomes strongly motivate the development of injury criteria for the lumbar spine and pelvis, the inclusion of intrinsic variability (e.g., abdomen depth and pelvis shape) in computational simulations of frontal impacts with reclined occupants, and the adaptation of comprehensive restraint paradigms to predicted variability of occupant posture.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
倾斜PMHS在正面碰撞中的运动学和损伤响应。
由于乘客靠后而造成的正面碰撞很少见,但很严重,预计随着自动驾驶功能车辆的引入,这种情况将变得更加普遍。需要计算和物理替身来设计和评估斜倚乘员的伤害对策,但这种替身在斜倚姿势下的有效性尚不清楚。为了确定其他替代物的生物保真度目标,以及描述倾斜的人体在受限正面碰撞中的生物力学反应,需要对处于倾斜姿势的死后人体受试者(PMHS)进行实验。本研究的目的是在30g, 50km /h的正面滑动试验中评估倾斜PMHS的运动学和损伤反应。对5名中型成年男性PMHS进行了测试。采用了带有反潜盘的简化半刚性座椅和非生产三点式安全带(预张紧、力限制、座椅集成)。测量头部、骨盆和多个椎骨的整体运动和局部加速度。座椅和安全带的作用力也被测量。通过试验后解剖评估损伤情况。最初的斜倚姿势使身体部位(骨盆、腰椎和胸腔)对齐,以减少座椅和安全带有效约束的可能性:乘员的骨盆最初向后旋转,为乘员的潜行做好准备,由于上半身在向前移动时的惯性,腰椎受到联合压缩和弯曲的负荷。再加上座椅和安全带的高约束力,不利的运动学导致骶骨/尾骨损伤(5例PMHS损伤中有4例)、髂翼损伤(5例PMHS损伤中有2例)、腰椎损伤(5例PMHS损伤中有3例)和胸腔损伤(5例PMHS损伤中有3例胸骨骨折,5例PMHS损伤中有3例肋骨骨折)。运动学和损伤结果强烈地推动了腰椎和骨盆损伤标准的发展,包括内在变异性(如腹部深度和骨盆形状)的计算模拟与倾斜的乘员正面碰撞,以及综合约束范式的适应,以预测乘员姿势的变异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stapp car crash journal
Stapp car crash journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Child Anthropometries in Relation to Modern Vehicle Seat and Booster Dimensions. Isolated Rib Response and Fracture Prediction for Young Mid-Size Male, Enabled by Population Specific Material Models and Rib Cross-Sectional Geometry. Effects of head restraint (HR) interference on child restraint system (CRS) performance in frontal and far-side impacts. Effect of A-Pillar Blind Spots on a Driver's Pedestrian Visibility during Vehicle Turns at an Intersection. Standardized Assessment of Gravity Settling Human Body Models for Virtual Testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1