The acceptability, effectiveness and gender responsiveness of participatory arts interventions in promoting mental health and Wellbeing: a systematic review.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Arts & Health Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-04 DOI:10.1080/17533015.2021.1894463
Shane O'Donnell, Maria Lohan, John L Oliffe, David Grant, Karen Galway
{"title":"The acceptability, effectiveness and gender responsiveness of participatory arts interventions in promoting mental health and Wellbeing: a systematic review.","authors":"Shane O'Donnell,&nbsp;Maria Lohan,&nbsp;John L Oliffe,&nbsp;David Grant,&nbsp;Karen Galway","doi":"10.1080/17533015.2021.1894463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This mixed methods review synthesizes the evidence of acceptability, effectiveness and gender-responsiveness of participatory arts interventions (PAIs) in promoting mental health and wellbeing among adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search was restricted to empirical studies of PAIs that reported on outcomes relating to common mental health problems and wellbeing among adults aged ≥18 years old. The mixed methods appraisal tool was used for quality appraisal. A narrative synthesis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two studies were included (1,058 participants). Typical PAI features are discussed. The evidence for effectiveness is limited by methodological issues. PAIs are perceived to benefit mental health via improved connectedness; emotional regulation; meaning-making & re-defining identity; and personal growth & empowerment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The review highlights the dearth of studies focused on men. Research standards to establish the evidence of effectiveness and the need to expand the evidence of acceptability beyond the \"perceived effectiveness\" domain are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":45944,"journal":{"name":"Arts & Health","volume":"14 2","pages":"186-203"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17533015.2021.1894463","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17533015.2021.1894463","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: This mixed methods review synthesizes the evidence of acceptability, effectiveness and gender-responsiveness of participatory arts interventions (PAIs) in promoting mental health and wellbeing among adults.

Methods: The search was restricted to empirical studies of PAIs that reported on outcomes relating to common mental health problems and wellbeing among adults aged ≥18 years old. The mixed methods appraisal tool was used for quality appraisal. A narrative synthesis was conducted.

Results: Thirty-two studies were included (1,058 participants). Typical PAI features are discussed. The evidence for effectiveness is limited by methodological issues. PAIs are perceived to benefit mental health via improved connectedness; emotional regulation; meaning-making & re-defining identity; and personal growth & empowerment.

Conclusion: The review highlights the dearth of studies focused on men. Research standards to establish the evidence of effectiveness and the need to expand the evidence of acceptability beyond the "perceived effectiveness" domain are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与式艺术干预在促进心理健康和福祉方面的可接受性、有效性和性别响应性:一项系统综述。
背景:这一混合方法综述综合了参与式艺术干预(PAIs)在促进成年人心理健康和福祉方面的可接受性、有效性和性别反应性的证据。方法:本研究仅限于报告18岁以上成年人常见心理健康问题和幸福感相关结果的PAIs的实证研究。采用混合方法评价工具进行质量评价。进行了叙事综合。结果:纳入32项研究(1058名受试者)。讨论了PAI的典型特征。有效性的证据受到方法问题的限制。PAIs被认为通过改善连通性而有益于心理健康;情绪调节;意义的创造与身份的重新定义;以及个人成长和赋权。结论:这篇综述强调了针对男性的研究的缺乏。讨论了建立有效性证据的研究标准以及将可接受性证据扩展到“感知有效性”领域之外的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arts & Health
Arts & Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Bandwidth and brushstrokes: a digital dialectic. The work of staying whole through art. A review of theatre interventions and mental health: inspiration, elicitation and dissemination. Exploring social worker views on transgender and non-binary rights in Aotearoa New Zealand using a poemish method. Does Creative Bibliotherapy delivered in schools improve mental health-related outcomes for 5-16 year olds? A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1