The Society of Astrologers (c.1647-1684): sermons, feasts and the resuscitation of astrology in seventeenth-century London.

IF 1.2 1区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE British Journal for the History of Science Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1017/S0007087421000029
Michelle Pfeffer
{"title":"The Society of Astrologers (<i>c.</i>1647-1684): sermons, feasts and the resuscitation of astrology in seventeenth-century London.","authors":"Michelle Pfeffer","doi":"10.1017/S0007087421000029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Before the Royal Society there was the Society of Astrologers (c.1647-1684), a group of around forty practitioners who met in London to enjoy lavish feasts, listen to sermons and exchange instruments and manuscripts. This article, drawing on untapped archival material, offers the first full account of this overlooked group. Convinced that astrology had been misunderstood by the professors who refused to teach it and the preachers who railed against it, the Society of Astrologers sought to democratize and legitimize their art. In contrast to the received view of seventeenth-century London astrologers, which emphasizes their bitter interrelationships, this article draws attention instead to their endeavours to mount a united front in defence of astrology. The article locates the society's attempts to promote astrological literacy within broader contemporary programmes to encourage mathematical education. Unlike other mathematical arts, however, astrology's religious credibility was an area of serious concern. The society therefore commissioned the delivery and publication of apologetic sermons that justified astrology on the basis of its sacred history. In this context, the legitimacy of astrology was more a religious than a scientific question. The society's public relations campaign ultimately failed, however, and its members disbanded in the mid-1680s. Not only were they mounting a rearguard action, but also they built their campaign on out-of-date historical arguments.</p>","PeriodicalId":46655,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the History of Science","volume":"54 2","pages":"133-153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0007087421000029","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal for the History of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087421000029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Before the Royal Society there was the Society of Astrologers (c.1647-1684), a group of around forty practitioners who met in London to enjoy lavish feasts, listen to sermons and exchange instruments and manuscripts. This article, drawing on untapped archival material, offers the first full account of this overlooked group. Convinced that astrology had been misunderstood by the professors who refused to teach it and the preachers who railed against it, the Society of Astrologers sought to democratize and legitimize their art. In contrast to the received view of seventeenth-century London astrologers, which emphasizes their bitter interrelationships, this article draws attention instead to their endeavours to mount a united front in defence of astrology. The article locates the society's attempts to promote astrological literacy within broader contemporary programmes to encourage mathematical education. Unlike other mathematical arts, however, astrology's religious credibility was an area of serious concern. The society therefore commissioned the delivery and publication of apologetic sermons that justified astrology on the basis of its sacred history. In this context, the legitimacy of astrology was more a religious than a scientific question. The society's public relations campaign ultimately failed, however, and its members disbanded in the mid-1680s. Not only were they mounting a rearguard action, but also they built their campaign on out-of-date historical arguments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
占星家协会(1647-1684年):布道、宴会和17世纪伦敦占星学的复兴。
在皇家学会之前,有占星家协会(Society of Astrologers, 1647-1684年),这是一个由大约40名从业者组成的团体,他们在伦敦聚会,享受奢华的宴会,聆听布道,交换仪器和手稿。本文利用未开发的档案材料,首次全面介绍了这个被忽视的群体。占星术协会确信,拒绝教授占星术的教授和斥责占星术的传教士误解了占星术,于是他们寻求使占星术民主化和合法化。与十七世纪伦敦占星家强调他们之间痛苦的相互关系的公认观点相反,这篇文章将注意力吸引到他们为捍卫占星学而建立统一战线的努力上。这篇文章将学会在当代鼓励数学教育的更广泛的计划中推广占星术素养的尝试定位。然而,与其他数学艺术不同,占星术的宗教可信度是一个值得严重关注的领域。因此,该协会委托交付和出版道歉布道,以其神圣的历史为基础证明占星术的合理性。在这种情况下,占星术的合法性与其说是一个科学问题,不如说是一个宗教问题。然而,该协会的公关活动最终失败了,其成员于17世纪80年代中期解散。他们不仅发起了防守行动,而且还把他们的竞选建立在过时的历史论点上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: This leading international journal publishes scholarly papers and review articles on all aspects of the history of science. History of science is interpreted widely to include medicine, technology and social studies of science. BJHS papers make important and lively contributions to scholarship and the journal has been an essential library resource for more than thirty years. It is also used extensively by historians and scholars in related fields. A substantial book review section is a central feature. There are four issues a year, comprising an annual volume of over 600 pages. Published for the British Society for the History of Science
期刊最新文献
Prognosis and scientific imagination in the work of Jane Webb Loudon (1800-1858). Capturing colour on HMS Beagle: Charles Darwin and Werner's Nomenclature of Colours (1821). Museum film as a means of making museums: the Exploratorium's early years through the intermedial lens. Liaisons dangereuses: Britain, the US, the Soviet Union and the circulation of knowledge about penicillin (1943-1950). Two books to trouble the biological - and disciplinary - boundaries that trouble us today.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1