Donanemab in Early Alzheimer's Disease.

IF 96.2 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL New England Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2021-05-06 Epub Date: 2021-03-13 DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2100708
Mark A Mintun, Albert C Lo, Cynthia Duggan Evans, Alette M Wessels, Paul A Ardayfio, Scott W Andersen, Sergey Shcherbinin, JonDavid Sparks, John R Sims, Miroslaw Brys, Liana G Apostolova, Stephen P Salloway, Daniel M Skovronsky
{"title":"Donanemab in Early Alzheimer's Disease.","authors":"Mark A Mintun,&nbsp;Albert C Lo,&nbsp;Cynthia Duggan Evans,&nbsp;Alette M Wessels,&nbsp;Paul A Ardayfio,&nbsp;Scott W Andersen,&nbsp;Sergey Shcherbinin,&nbsp;JonDavid Sparks,&nbsp;John R Sims,&nbsp;Miroslaw Brys,&nbsp;Liana G Apostolova,&nbsp;Stephen P Salloway,&nbsp;Daniel M Skovronsky","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2100708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A hallmark of Alzheimer's disease is the accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide. Donanemab, an antibody that targets a modified form of deposited Aβ, is being investigated for the treatment of early Alzheimer's disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a phase 2 trial of donanemab in patients with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease who had tau and amyloid deposition on positron-emission tomography (PET). Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive donanemab (700 mg for the first three doses and 1400 mg thereafter) or placebo intravenously every 4 weeks for up to 72 weeks. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in the score on the Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS; range, 0 to 144, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive and functional impairment) at 76 weeks. Secondary outcomes included the change in scores on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), the 13-item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog<sub>13</sub>), the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-iADL), and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), as well as the change in the amyloid and tau burden on PET.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 257 patients were enrolled; 131 were assigned to receive donanemab and 126 to receive placebo. The baseline iADRS score was 106 in both groups. The change from baseline in the iADRS score at 76 weeks was -6.86 with donanemab and -10.06 with placebo (difference, 3.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.12 to 6.27; P = 0.04). The results for most secondary outcomes showed no substantial difference. At 76 weeks, the reductions in the amyloid plaque level and the global tau load were 85.06 centiloids and 0.01 greater, respectively, with donanemab than with placebo. Amyloid-related cerebral edema or effusions (mostly asymptomatic) occurred with donanemab.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with early Alzheimer's disease, donanemab resulted in a better composite score for cognition and for the ability to perform activities of daily living than placebo at 76 weeks, although results for secondary outcomes were mixed. Longer and larger trials are necessary to study the efficacy and safety of donanemab in Alzheimer's disease. (Funded by Eli Lilly; TRAILBLAZER-ALZ ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03367403.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":96.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"466","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2100708","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 466

Abstract

Background: A hallmark of Alzheimer's disease is the accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide. Donanemab, an antibody that targets a modified form of deposited Aβ, is being investigated for the treatment of early Alzheimer's disease.

Methods: We conducted a phase 2 trial of donanemab in patients with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease who had tau and amyloid deposition on positron-emission tomography (PET). Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive donanemab (700 mg for the first three doses and 1400 mg thereafter) or placebo intravenously every 4 weeks for up to 72 weeks. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in the score on the Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS; range, 0 to 144, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive and functional impairment) at 76 weeks. Secondary outcomes included the change in scores on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), the 13-item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog13), the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-iADL), and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), as well as the change in the amyloid and tau burden on PET.

Results: A total of 257 patients were enrolled; 131 were assigned to receive donanemab and 126 to receive placebo. The baseline iADRS score was 106 in both groups. The change from baseline in the iADRS score at 76 weeks was -6.86 with donanemab and -10.06 with placebo (difference, 3.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.12 to 6.27; P = 0.04). The results for most secondary outcomes showed no substantial difference. At 76 weeks, the reductions in the amyloid plaque level and the global tau load were 85.06 centiloids and 0.01 greater, respectively, with donanemab than with placebo. Amyloid-related cerebral edema or effusions (mostly asymptomatic) occurred with donanemab.

Conclusions: In patients with early Alzheimer's disease, donanemab resulted in a better composite score for cognition and for the ability to perform activities of daily living than placebo at 76 weeks, although results for secondary outcomes were mixed. Longer and larger trials are necessary to study the efficacy and safety of donanemab in Alzheimer's disease. (Funded by Eli Lilly; TRAILBLAZER-ALZ ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03367403.).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Donanemab在早期阿尔茨海默病中的应用
背景:阿尔茨海默病的一个标志是淀粉样蛋白-β (Aβ)肽的积累。Donanemab是一种靶向沉积a β修饰形式的抗体,目前正在研究用于治疗早期阿尔茨海默病。方法:我们在早期症状性阿尔茨海默病患者中进行了donanemab的2期试验,这些患者在正电子发射断层扫描(PET)上有tau和淀粉样蛋白沉积。患者以1:1的比例随机分配接受多纳耐单抗(前三次剂量为700毫克,之后为1400毫克)或安慰剂,每4周静脉注射一次,持续72周。主要结局是阿尔茨海默病综合评定量表(iADRS;范围从0到144,分数越低表明认知和功能障碍越严重)。次要结果包括临床痴呆评定量表-方框和(CDR-SB)、阿尔茨海默病评估量表(ADAS-Cog13)的13项认知子量表、阿尔茨海默病合作研究-日常生活工具性活动量表(ADCS-iADL)和迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)得分的变化,以及PET淀粉样蛋白和tau负担的变化。结果:共纳入257例患者;131人接受多纳单抗治疗,126人接受安慰剂治疗。两组的基线iADRS评分均为106。76周时,多纳单抗组的iADRS评分较基线变化为-6.86,安慰剂组为-10.06(差异3.20;95%置信区间为0.12 ~ 6.27;p = 0.04)。大多数次要结果的结果显示没有实质性差异。76周时,与安慰剂组相比,donanemab组的淀粉样斑块水平和总tau蛋白负荷分别减少了85.06个厘体和0.01个厘体。多纳单抗可发生淀粉样蛋白相关脑水肿或脑积液(多数无症状)。结论:在早期阿尔茨海默病患者中,donanemab在认知和日常生活活动能力方面的综合评分在76周时优于安慰剂,尽管次要结局的结果好坏参半。研究donanemab治疗阿尔茨海默病的有效性和安全性需要更长时间和更大规模的试验。(由礼来公司资助;trailblazeralz ClinicalTrials.gov号码:NCT03367403)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New England Journal of Medicine
New England Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
145.40
自引率
0.60%
发文量
1839
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stands as the foremost medical journal and website worldwide. With an impressive history spanning over two centuries, NEJM boasts a consistent publication of superb, peer-reviewed research and engaging clinical content. Our primary objective revolves around delivering high-caliber information and findings at the juncture of biomedical science and clinical practice. We strive to present this knowledge in formats that are not only comprehensible but also hold practical value, effectively influencing healthcare practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Neoadjuvant Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Resectable Stage III Melanoma. Final Results for Adjuvant Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Stage III Melanoma. From Evidence to Policy - Finding Authoritative Sources of Information on Health. Long Covid Defined. Invasive Treatment Strategy for Older Patients with Myocardial Infarction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1