Development of postgraduate training in critical care medicine for nurse practitioners and physician assistants.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners Pub Date : 2021-03-12 DOI:10.1097/JXX.0000000000000574
Christine Y Zhou, Vikas Pathak
{"title":"Development of postgraduate training in critical care medicine for nurse practitioners and physician assistants.","authors":"Christine Y Zhou,&nbsp;Vikas Pathak","doi":"10.1097/JXX.0000000000000574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PA) are increasingly providing care to the critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. We structured a 4-month training program for our existing NPs and PAs and assessed their knowledge and skill pre and post training. The program was composed of blended didactic in critical care medicine topics, critical care simulations in simulation laboratory, and supervised critical care procedures. Formal knowledge and skill assessments were performed before and after the program to assess success in meeting predefined learning objectives. The mean preintervention medical knowledge assessment score was 3.37 ± 0.56 SD, which significantly improved to 3.86 ± 0.46 SD (p < .00001). For clinical skills for critical care procedures, the mean preintervention score was 3.10 ± 0.86 SD, which improved to 3.61 ± 0.92 SD (p < .00001). The overall knowledge (including medical knowledge and clinical skills) improved from mean 3.30 ± 0.86 SD to 3.80 ± 0.42 SD. The improvement was seen regardless of the duration of experience in critical care medicine. We concluded that structured didactics with supervised procedural training along with dedicated training in simulation laboratories, even for a short period, improves the overall knowledge and clinical skills required to work in a critical care setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":48812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000000574","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract: Nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PA) are increasingly providing care to the critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. We structured a 4-month training program for our existing NPs and PAs and assessed their knowledge and skill pre and post training. The program was composed of blended didactic in critical care medicine topics, critical care simulations in simulation laboratory, and supervised critical care procedures. Formal knowledge and skill assessments were performed before and after the program to assess success in meeting predefined learning objectives. The mean preintervention medical knowledge assessment score was 3.37 ± 0.56 SD, which significantly improved to 3.86 ± 0.46 SD (p < .00001). For clinical skills for critical care procedures, the mean preintervention score was 3.10 ± 0.86 SD, which improved to 3.61 ± 0.92 SD (p < .00001). The overall knowledge (including medical knowledge and clinical skills) improved from mean 3.30 ± 0.86 SD to 3.80 ± 0.42 SD. The improvement was seen regardless of the duration of experience in critical care medicine. We concluded that structured didactics with supervised procedural training along with dedicated training in simulation laboratories, even for a short period, improves the overall knowledge and clinical skills required to work in a critical care setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展重症护理医学的研究生培训,为护士从业人员和医师助理。
摘要:执业护士(NPs)和医师助理(PA)越来越多地为重症监护病房的重症患者提供护理。我们为现有的NPs和pa制定了一个为期4个月的培训计划,并评估了他们在培训前后的知识和技能。该计划由重症监护医学主题的混合教学,模拟实验室的重症监护模拟和监督重症监护程序组成。在课程前后进行了正式的知识和技能评估,以评估是否成功达到预定的学习目标。干预前医学知识评估得分均值由3.37±0.56 SD显著提高至3.86±0.46 SD (p < 0.001)。在重症监护程序的临床技能方面,干预前平均评分为3.10±0.86 SD,升至3.61±0.92 SD (p < 0.00001)。整体知识(包括医学知识和临床技能)由平均3.30±0.86 SD提高到3.80±0.42 SD。无论重症监护医学经验的长短,这种改善都是可见的。我们得出的结论是,在模拟实验室进行有监督的程序培训和专门培训的结构化教学,即使是很短的时间,也能提高在重症监护环境中工作所需的整体知识和临床技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-NURSING
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
172
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (JAANP) is a monthly peer-reviewed professional journal that serves as the official publication of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. Published since 1989, the JAANP provides a strong clinical focus with articles related to primary, secondary, and tertiary care, nurse practitioner education, health policy, ethics and ethical issues, and health care delivery. The journal publishes original research, integrative/comprehensive reviews, case studies, a variety of topics in clinical practice, and theory-based articles related to patient and professional education. Although the majority of nurse practitioners function in primary care, there is an increasing focus on the provision of care across all types of systems from acute to long-term care settings.
期刊最新文献
Unregulated male sexual enhancement treatments: Perils and pitfalls for patients and providers Enhancing competency-based assessment: Implementing oral boards in nursing education Enhancing foot care education and support strategies in adults with type 2 diabetes: A qualitative study The important primary care role of neonatal nurse practitioners in the neonatal intensive care unit. Bridging the education-practice gap: Changing nurse practitioner skills through education innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1