Quantification of nutritive sucking among preterm and full-term infants.

IF 0.6 Q4 PEDIATRICS Research and reports in neonatology Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-10-08 DOI:10.2147/rrn.s165421
Ashley Scherman, Jack Wiedrick, William Lang, Rebecca Rdesinski, Jodi Lapidus, Cynthia McEvoy, Aimee Abu-Shamsieh, Scott Buckley, Brian Rogers, Neil Buist
{"title":"Quantification of nutritive sucking among preterm and full-term infants.","authors":"Ashley Scherman, Jack Wiedrick, William Lang, Rebecca Rdesinski, Jodi Lapidus, Cynthia McEvoy, Aimee Abu-Shamsieh, Scott Buckley, Brian Rogers, Neil Buist","doi":"10.2147/rrn.s165421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We developed summaries of oral bottle-feeding skills among preterm (<37 gestational weeks) and full-term (≥37 gestational weeks) infants using a mechanical device (Orometer) to measure intraoral pressure changes, with accompanying automated software and analytics. We then compared the rates of change in feeding skills over several weeks (feeding trends) between preterm and full-term infants. We also compared group means at 40 weeks post menstrual age (PMA).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Healthy full-term and preterm infants capable of oral feeding were recruited from the Pediatric Outpatient Clinic at University of California San Francisco, Fresno, and from the Oregon Health & Science University Doernbecher Neonatal Critical Care Unit, respectively. Feeding skill was quantified using an Orometer and automated suck-analysis software. Factor analysis reduced the >40 metrics produced by the Orometer system to the following seven factors that accounted for >99% of the sample covariance: suck vigor, endurance, resting, irregularity, frequency, variability, and bursting. We proposed that these factors represent feeding skills and they served as the dependent variables in linear models estimating trends in feeding skills over time for full-term and preterm infants (maturation). At approximately 40 weeks PMA we compared mean feedings skills between infants born preterm and those born full-term using predictions from our models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feeding skills for 117 full-term infants and 82 preterm infants were first captured at mean PMA of 42.3 and 36.0 weeks, respectively. For some feeding skills, preterm and full-term infants showed different trends over time. At 37-40 weeks PMA, preterm infants took approximately 15% fewer sucks than infants born full-term (p=0.06) and generally had weaker suck vigor, greater resting, and less endurance than full-term babies. Preterm infant-feeding skills appeared similar to those of full-term infants upon reaching ≥40 weeks PMA, although preterm infants showed greater variability for all factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Orometer device, accompanying software, and analytic methods provided a framework for describing trends in oral feeding, thereby allowing us to characterize differences in maturation of feeding between healthy preterm and full-term infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":87354,"journal":{"name":"Research and reports in neonatology","volume":"8 ","pages":"53-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7971427/pdf/nihms-1553848.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and reports in neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/rrn.s165421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We developed summaries of oral bottle-feeding skills among preterm (<37 gestational weeks) and full-term (≥37 gestational weeks) infants using a mechanical device (Orometer) to measure intraoral pressure changes, with accompanying automated software and analytics. We then compared the rates of change in feeding skills over several weeks (feeding trends) between preterm and full-term infants. We also compared group means at 40 weeks post menstrual age (PMA).

Patients and methods: Healthy full-term and preterm infants capable of oral feeding were recruited from the Pediatric Outpatient Clinic at University of California San Francisco, Fresno, and from the Oregon Health & Science University Doernbecher Neonatal Critical Care Unit, respectively. Feeding skill was quantified using an Orometer and automated suck-analysis software. Factor analysis reduced the >40 metrics produced by the Orometer system to the following seven factors that accounted for >99% of the sample covariance: suck vigor, endurance, resting, irregularity, frequency, variability, and bursting. We proposed that these factors represent feeding skills and they served as the dependent variables in linear models estimating trends in feeding skills over time for full-term and preterm infants (maturation). At approximately 40 weeks PMA we compared mean feedings skills between infants born preterm and those born full-term using predictions from our models.

Results: Feeding skills for 117 full-term infants and 82 preterm infants were first captured at mean PMA of 42.3 and 36.0 weeks, respectively. For some feeding skills, preterm and full-term infants showed different trends over time. At 37-40 weeks PMA, preterm infants took approximately 15% fewer sucks than infants born full-term (p=0.06) and generally had weaker suck vigor, greater resting, and less endurance than full-term babies. Preterm infant-feeding skills appeared similar to those of full-term infants upon reaching ≥40 weeks PMA, although preterm infants showed greater variability for all factors.

Conclusion: The Orometer device, accompanying software, and analytic methods provided a framework for describing trends in oral feeding, thereby allowing us to characterize differences in maturation of feeding between healthy preterm and full-term infants.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早产儿和足月儿营养性吮吸的量化。
目的:我们对早产儿的口腔奶瓶喂养技能进行了总结。 患者和方法:我们分别从加州大学旧金山分校弗雷斯诺分校的儿科门诊和俄勒冈健康与科学大学多恩比彻新生儿重症监护室招募了能够进行口腔喂养的健康足月儿和早产儿。喂养技能使用奥罗米计和自动吸吮分析软件进行量化。因子分析将 Orometer 系统产生的超过 40 个指标简化为以下 7 个因子,这些因子占样本协方差的超过 99%:吸吮力度、耐力、静止、不规则性、频率、可变性和爆发性。我们认为这些因素代表了喂养技能,并将其作为线性模型中的因变量,估算出足月儿和早产儿喂养技能随时间变化的趋势(成熟期)。在早产儿出生约 40 周时,我们利用模型预测结果比较了早产儿和足月儿的平均喂养技能:117 名足月儿和 82 名早产儿的喂养技能分别是在平均 PMA 为 42.3 周和 36.0 周时首次获得的。在某些喂养技能方面,早产儿和足月儿随着时间的推移呈现出不同的趋势。在 PMA 37-40 周时,早产儿的吸吮次数比足月儿少约 15%(P=0.06),而且吸吮力度普遍比足月儿弱,休息时间更长,耐力更差。尽管早产儿在所有因素上都表现出更大的变异性,但早产儿在PMA≥40周时的喂养技能似乎与足月儿相似:Orometer设备、配套软件和分析方法为描述口腔喂养趋势提供了一个框架,从而使我们能够描述健康早产儿和足月儿在喂养成熟方面的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Global Crisis of Congenital Syphilis: Vulnerable and Disenfranchised Women Most at Risk Hydrops fetalis: Incidence, Etiologies, Management Strategies, and Outcomes Neonatal Hydrometrocolpos Secondary to Imperforate Hymen Presented with Acute Urinary Retention: Case Report Magnitude of Neonatal Admission Diagnosis and Associated Factors at Selected Hospitals in Wollo, Northeast Ethiopia Updated Perspectives on the Diagnosis and Management of Neonatal Invasive Candidiasis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1