Perceptions of student accoucheurs regarding gender inequality in midwifery training at Free State maternal healthcare institutions.

Q2 Medicine Curationis Pub Date : 2021-02-18 DOI:10.4102/curationis.v44i1.1988
Siphiwe T Madlala, Thembelihle S Ngxongo, Maureen N Sibiya
{"title":"Perceptions of student accoucheurs regarding gender inequality in midwifery training at Free State maternal healthcare institutions.","authors":"Siphiwe T Madlala,&nbsp;Thembelihle S Ngxongo,&nbsp;Maureen N Sibiya","doi":"10.4102/curationis.v44i1.1988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Worldwide, gender inequality has been a dominating factor in the training of student accoucheurs in most maternal healthcare institutions. This poses challenges for the maternal healthcare institutions where student accoucheurs are placed for clinical practice as most women become reluctant or refuse to accept their services. Gender inequality has a negative impact on the training of student accoucheurs as most of them become demotivated which could lead to a high attrition rate.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explored and described the perceptions of student accoucheurs regarding gender inequality in midwifery training at the Free State maternal healthcare institutions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An explorative and descriptive qualitative research design was undertaken. There were 40 student accoucheurs that formed 10 focus group discussions. Each focus group discussion had four participants. Tesch's eight-steps of data analysis was used to analyse data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three major themes emerged during data analysis: meeting the training requirements in midwifery, women's autonomy in a choice of healthcare provider versus student accoucheurs' autonomy to be trained in midwifery and staff establishment to render maternal healthcare.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The participants perceived prejudice, rejection and resistance by women in maternity units as a contributing factor to gender inequality, which has a negative impact on their training in midwifery. The study recommends that health directorates, nurse managers and training institutions should consider revising maternal healthcare policies regarding the recruitment and placement of willing accoucheurs in maternity units in order to address gender inequality.</p>","PeriodicalId":35715,"journal":{"name":"Curationis","volume":"44 1","pages":"e1-e8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curationis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v44i1.1988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Worldwide, gender inequality has been a dominating factor in the training of student accoucheurs in most maternal healthcare institutions. This poses challenges for the maternal healthcare institutions where student accoucheurs are placed for clinical practice as most women become reluctant or refuse to accept their services. Gender inequality has a negative impact on the training of student accoucheurs as most of them become demotivated which could lead to a high attrition rate.

Objectives: This study explored and described the perceptions of student accoucheurs regarding gender inequality in midwifery training at the Free State maternal healthcare institutions.

Method: An explorative and descriptive qualitative research design was undertaken. There were 40 student accoucheurs that formed 10 focus group discussions. Each focus group discussion had four participants. Tesch's eight-steps of data analysis was used to analyse data.

Results: Three major themes emerged during data analysis: meeting the training requirements in midwifery, women's autonomy in a choice of healthcare provider versus student accoucheurs' autonomy to be trained in midwifery and staff establishment to render maternal healthcare.

Conclusion: The participants perceived prejudice, rejection and resistance by women in maternity units as a contributing factor to gender inequality, which has a negative impact on their training in midwifery. The study recommends that health directorates, nurse managers and training institutions should consider revising maternal healthcare policies regarding the recruitment and placement of willing accoucheurs in maternity units in order to address gender inequality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于自由邦孕产妇保健机构助产培训中性别不平等问题的学生会计的看法。
背景:在世界范围内,性别不平等一直是大多数孕产妇保健机构培训学生会计的主要因素。这给产妇保健机构带来了挑战,因为大多数妇女不愿意或拒绝接受他们的服务,学生会计被安排在这些机构进行临床实践。性别不平等对学生会计的培训产生了负面影响,因为他们中的大多数人变得缺乏动力,这可能导致高流失率。目的:本研究探讨并描述了在自由邦孕产妇保健机构助产培训中,实习助产士对性别不平等的看法。方法:采用探索性、描述性质的研究设计。有40名学生组成了10个焦点小组讨论。每个焦点小组讨论有四名参与者。使用Tesch的八步数据分析来分析数据。结果:在数据分析期间出现了三个主要主题:满足助产培训要求、妇女选择保健提供者的自主权与助产培训学生会计的自主权和提供产妇保健的工作人员编制。结论:参与者认为产妇的偏见、排斥和抗拒是造成性别不平等的一个因素,这对他们的助产培训产生了负面影响。该研究建议,卫生主管部门、护士管理人员和培训机构应考虑修订有关在产科单位招聘和安置有意愿的会计的产妇保健政策,以解决性别不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Curationis
Curationis Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Identity work of public hospital nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa Midwifery hurdles: Navigating tuberculosis screening challenges in South Africa Newly qualified professional nurses' experiences providing postoperative care to children in CTICU. Nurses' practices in stroke-related dysphagia in low- and middle-income countries. Guidelines to support newly qualified professional nurses for effective clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1