The influence of the multimedia and modality principles on the learning outcomes, satisfaction, and mental effort of college students with and without dyslexia

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Annals of Dyslexia Pub Date : 2021-03-25 DOI:10.1007/s11881-021-00219-z
Kara Dawson, Jiawen Zhu, Albert D. Ritzhaupt, Pavlo Antonenko, Kendra Saunders, Jiahui Wang, Linda Lombardino
{"title":"The influence of the multimedia and modality principles on the learning outcomes, satisfaction, and mental effort of college students with and without dyslexia","authors":"Kara Dawson,&nbsp;Jiawen Zhu,&nbsp;Albert D. Ritzhaupt,&nbsp;Pavlo Antonenko,&nbsp;Kendra Saunders,&nbsp;Jiahui Wang,&nbsp;Linda Lombardino","doi":"10.1007/s11881-021-00219-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this study was to examine the application of the multimedia and modality principles on cued-recall, recognition, and mental effort of college students with and without dyslexia. The study used a Multimedia (Image Present vs. Image Absent) × Modality (Narration vs. Onscreen Text) × Dyslexia (Dyslexia vs. Non-Dyslexia) 3-way factorial design with each independent variable serving as a between-subject condition. A total of <i>N</i> = 148 participants (73 with dyslexia and 75 without dyslexia) were recruited from five different institutions of higher education in the Southeastern United States and systematically assigned to one of four multimedia learning conditions. After assessing our data for statistical assumptions, we employed factorial Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) models on each dependent measure. Our findings show a reverse modality effect for students with dyslexia who performed better than their peers without dyslexia in Onscreen Text conditions. Although performance was better across groups and conditions when images were present, there were no significant interactions related to the multimedia condition. Similarly, there were no significant interactions related to mental effort even though learners with dyslexia exhibited high instructional efficiency in the Onscreen Text-Image Present condition while learners without dyslexia exhibited low task involvement in the Onscreen Text-Image Absent condition. Our results provide theoretical implications and important avenues for future research and practice as related to how multimedia learning influences students with dyslexia. We also suggest studies that could inform the eventual design of adaptive and personalized multimedia learning solutions for learners with dyslexia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":"71 1","pages":"188 - 210"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11881-021-00219-z","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-021-00219-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the application of the multimedia and modality principles on cued-recall, recognition, and mental effort of college students with and without dyslexia. The study used a Multimedia (Image Present vs. Image Absent) × Modality (Narration vs. Onscreen Text) × Dyslexia (Dyslexia vs. Non-Dyslexia) 3-way factorial design with each independent variable serving as a between-subject condition. A total of N = 148 participants (73 with dyslexia and 75 without dyslexia) were recruited from five different institutions of higher education in the Southeastern United States and systematically assigned to one of four multimedia learning conditions. After assessing our data for statistical assumptions, we employed factorial Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) models on each dependent measure. Our findings show a reverse modality effect for students with dyslexia who performed better than their peers without dyslexia in Onscreen Text conditions. Although performance was better across groups and conditions when images were present, there were no significant interactions related to the multimedia condition. Similarly, there were no significant interactions related to mental effort even though learners with dyslexia exhibited high instructional efficiency in the Onscreen Text-Image Present condition while learners without dyslexia exhibited low task involvement in the Onscreen Text-Image Absent condition. Our results provide theoretical implications and important avenues for future research and practice as related to how multimedia learning influences students with dyslexia. We also suggest studies that could inform the eventual design of adaptive and personalized multimedia learning solutions for learners with dyslexia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多媒体和模态原理对有阅读障碍和无阅读障碍大学生学习成绩、满意度和心理努力的影响
本研究的目的是检验多媒体和模态原理在有和没有阅读障碍的大学生提示回忆、识别和心理努力方面的应用。该研究采用了多媒体(图像存在与图像缺失)×情态(叙述与屏幕文本)×诵读困难(诵读困难与非诵读困难)三元析因设计,每个自变量都作为受试者之间的条件。共有N=148名参与者(73名有阅读障碍,75名无阅读障碍)从美国东南部的五所不同的高等教育机构招募,并被系统地分配到四种多媒体学习条件中的一种。在评估了我们的数据的统计假设后,我们对每个相关指标采用了因子方差分析(ANOVA)模型。我们的研究结果显示,在屏幕文本条件下,有阅读障碍的学生比没有阅读障碍的同龄人表现更好,这会产生相反的模式效应。尽管当图像出现时,各组和条件下的表现更好,但没有与多媒体条件相关的显著交互。同样,尽管有阅读障碍的学习者在屏幕上文本图像存在的条件下表现出较高的教学效率,而没有阅读障碍的学生在屏幕上文字图像缺失的条件下则表现出较低的任务参与度,但也没有与心理努力相关的显著互动。我们的研究结果为未来多媒体学习如何影响阅读障碍学生的研究和实践提供了理论启示和重要途径。我们还提出了一些研究,这些研究可以为阅读障碍学习者的自适应和个性化多媒体学习解决方案的最终设计提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Dyslexia
Annals of Dyslexia Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Annals of Dyslexia is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the scientific study of dyslexia, its comorbid conditions; and theory-based practices on remediation, and intervention of dyslexia and related areas of written language disorders including spelling, composing and mathematics. Primary consideration for publication is given to original empirical studies, significant review, and well-documented reports of evidence-based effective practices. Only original papers are considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Foveal crowding in children with developmental dyslexia. Bridging the Gap in Adult Dyslexia Research: Assessing the Efficacy of a Linguistic Intervention on Literacy Skills. Dyslexia in the 21st century: revisiting the consensus definition Exploring the feasibility of implementing the SPELL-Links to Reading and Writing intervention. Identifying students with dyslexia: exploration of current assessment methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1