Reliability, Validity, and Minimal Detectable Change of the Backward Walk Test in Older Adults With Dementia.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-23 DOI:10.1519/JPT.0000000000000306
Wayne L S Chan, Yue To Cheung, Yin Wing Lee, Ai Mei Teo, Hui Kiu Wo, Yui Wong
{"title":"Reliability, Validity, and Minimal Detectable Change of the Backward Walk Test in Older Adults With Dementia.","authors":"Wayne L S Chan,&nbsp;Yue To Cheung,&nbsp;Yin Wing Lee,&nbsp;Ai Mei Teo,&nbsp;Hui Kiu Wo,&nbsp;Yui Wong","doi":"10.1519/JPT.0000000000000306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The backward walk test (BWT) has been used to evaluate the balance, gait, and fall risk for older adults, but its psychometric properties in older adults with dementia have not been investigated. This study aims to examine the test-retest and interrater reliability, construct and known-group validity, and absolute and relative minimal detectable changes at the 95% level of confidence (MDC95) of the BWT in older adults with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a cross-sectional study with repeated measures. Thirty older adults with a mean age of 83.3 years and a diagnosis of dementia who were able to walk backward independently for at least 3 m were recruited from day care and residential care units. The BWT was conducted on 3 separate testing occasions within 2 weeks under 2 independent raters using a modified progressive cueing system. The 10-m walk test (10MWT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Timed Up and Go test (TUG) were used to assess the gait, balance, and mobility performances of the participants.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>The BWT had excellent test-retest reliability-intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.96-and interrater reliability (ICC = 0.97-0.97) in the participants. Moderate correlations between the BWT and BBS (Spearman's ρ = 0.60) and strong correlations between the BWT and 10MWT (ρ= 0.84) and TUG (ρ=-0.82) were found. The BWT could distinguish between the participants who ambulated with walking aids and those who did not (P = .005). The participants who had experienced a fall in the past year did not differ significantly in the BWT compared with those who had not fallen (P = .36). The absolute and relative MDC95 of the BWT in the participants were 0.10 m/s and 39.3%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BWT is reliable and valid in assessing balance and gait performances in older adults with dementia. Further investigation is needed to determine whether the BWT can identify those with an increased risk of falls.</p>","PeriodicalId":49035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000306","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: The backward walk test (BWT) has been used to evaluate the balance, gait, and fall risk for older adults, but its psychometric properties in older adults with dementia have not been investigated. This study aims to examine the test-retest and interrater reliability, construct and known-group validity, and absolute and relative minimal detectable changes at the 95% level of confidence (MDC95) of the BWT in older adults with dementia.

Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study with repeated measures. Thirty older adults with a mean age of 83.3 years and a diagnosis of dementia who were able to walk backward independently for at least 3 m were recruited from day care and residential care units. The BWT was conducted on 3 separate testing occasions within 2 weeks under 2 independent raters using a modified progressive cueing system. The 10-m walk test (10MWT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Timed Up and Go test (TUG) were used to assess the gait, balance, and mobility performances of the participants.

Results and discussion: The BWT had excellent test-retest reliability-intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.96-and interrater reliability (ICC = 0.97-0.97) in the participants. Moderate correlations between the BWT and BBS (Spearman's ρ = 0.60) and strong correlations between the BWT and 10MWT (ρ= 0.84) and TUG (ρ=-0.82) were found. The BWT could distinguish between the participants who ambulated with walking aids and those who did not (P = .005). The participants who had experienced a fall in the past year did not differ significantly in the BWT compared with those who had not fallen (P = .36). The absolute and relative MDC95 of the BWT in the participants were 0.10 m/s and 39.3%, respectively.

Conclusions: The BWT is reliable and valid in assessing balance and gait performances in older adults with dementia. Further investigation is needed to determine whether the BWT can identify those with an increased risk of falls.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年痴呆患者后退行走试验的信度、效度和最小可检测变化。
背景与目的:后退行走测试(BWT)已被用于评估老年人的平衡、步态和跌倒风险,但其在老年痴呆患者中的心理测量特性尚未被研究。本研究旨在检验老年痴呆患者BWT的重测和互测信度、构建和已知组效度,以及在95%置信水平(MDC95)下的绝对和相对最小可检测变化。方法:本研究采用重复测量的横断面研究。研究招募了30名平均年龄为83.3岁、被诊断为痴呆症、能够独立向后行走至少3米的老年人,他们来自日托和寄宿护理单位。BWT在2周内进行了3次独立测试,由2名独立评分者使用改进的渐进式提示系统。采用10米步行测试(10MWT)、Berg平衡量表(BBS)和定时起身和行走测试(TUG)来评估参与者的步态、平衡和活动能力。结果与讨论:BWT在被试中具有优异的重测信度——类内相关系数(ICC) = 0.96,组间信度(ICC = 0.97-0.97)。BWT与BBS呈中等相关性(Spearman ρ = 0.60),BWT与10MWT (ρ= 0.84)和TUG呈强相关性(ρ=-0.82)。BWT可以区分带助行器行走和不带助行器行走的参与者(P = 0.005)。在过去一年中经历过跌倒的参与者与没有跌倒的参与者相比,BWT没有显著差异(P = 0.36)。BWT的绝对MDC95为0.10 m/s,相对MDC95为39.3%。结论:BWT在评估老年痴呆患者的平衡和步态方面是可靠和有效的。需要进一步的调查来确定BWT是否能识别出那些摔倒风险增加的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy is the leading source of clinically applicable evidence for achieving optimal health, wellness, mobility, and physical function across the continuum of health status for the aging adult. The mission of the Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy is building a community that advances the profession of physical therapy to optimize the experience of aging.
期刊最新文献
A Scoping Review of the Predictive Qualities of Walking Speed in Older Adults. Associations of Usual and Fast Gait Speed With Physical Performance and Balance Confidence in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Implications for Assessment. Simple Mobility Tests Predict Use of Assistive Devices in Older Adults. Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs (STEPS): Assessing Stair Function in Older Adults. The Power of Language: Words to Mend or Fuel Ageism Within Geriatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1