Use of a Pediatric Obesity Fall-risk Scale (POFS) in 301 hospitalized obese children and adolescents

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing Pub Date : 2021-03-31 DOI:10.1111/jspn.12335
Sofia Tamini, Sabrina Cicolini, Anna Porcu, Angela Seddone, Nancy Ryan-Wenger, Alessandro Sartorio
{"title":"Use of a Pediatric Obesity Fall-risk Scale (POFS) in 301 hospitalized obese children and adolescents","authors":"Sofia Tamini,&nbsp;Sabrina Cicolini,&nbsp;Anna Porcu,&nbsp;Angela Seddone,&nbsp;Nancy Ryan-Wenger,&nbsp;Alessandro Sartorio","doi":"10.1111/jspn.12335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Falls are a significant safety risk in hospitalized patients, but little evidence regarding their significance in obese children are available to date. Aim of the study was to determine whether the Pediatric Obesity Fall-risk Scale (POFS) is able to discriminate between hospitalized obese pediatric patients at high or low risk of falling, to evaluate its sensitivity and specificity and to analyze if the risk factors considered were actually related to the falling event.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The sample consisted of 301 children and adolescents hospitalized for a body weight reduction program. In this 12-month study, 14.6% of patients experienced a fall during hospitalization, the fall rate per 1000 patient days being 5.33 for the first and 4.36 for the second 6-month of the year. The components of the POFS included chronological age, history of falls, body mass index standard deviation score (BMI-SDS), and the ability to maintain equilibrium.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>No differences were observed between fallers and nonfallers as far as BMI and BMI-SDS are concerned. Compared with patients who did not fall, those who fell were significantly younger and shorter and their weights were lower. The POFS identified 85 patients with high and 216 with low falling risk, the two subgroups being comparable for BMI and BMI-SDS. Compared with patients with low fall-risk, those with high fall-risk were significantly younger and shorter and their weights were lower. The sensitivity of the POFS was 61.4%, while the specificity was 77.4%. The positive predictive value of the POFS was 31.8%, while the negative predictive value was 92.1%. The analyses of each POFS component did not show significant differences between fallers and non-fallers in terms of BMI-SDS and equilibrium test. Compared with patients who did not fall, those who fell were significantly younger, experienced a fall during the 3 months prior the admission in hospital and their total POFS score was higher.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Practice Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Preventing falls in hospitalized obese pediatric patients is challenging due to the markedly increased risk of this population and specific fall-risk assessment tools are required to early identify patients who needs more care, attention, and specific nursing/medical interventions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54900,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jspn.12335","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jspn.12335","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Falls are a significant safety risk in hospitalized patients, but little evidence regarding their significance in obese children are available to date. Aim of the study was to determine whether the Pediatric Obesity Fall-risk Scale (POFS) is able to discriminate between hospitalized obese pediatric patients at high or low risk of falling, to evaluate its sensitivity and specificity and to analyze if the risk factors considered were actually related to the falling event.

Design and Methods

The sample consisted of 301 children and adolescents hospitalized for a body weight reduction program. In this 12-month study, 14.6% of patients experienced a fall during hospitalization, the fall rate per 1000 patient days being 5.33 for the first and 4.36 for the second 6-month of the year. The components of the POFS included chronological age, history of falls, body mass index standard deviation score (BMI-SDS), and the ability to maintain equilibrium.

Results

No differences were observed between fallers and nonfallers as far as BMI and BMI-SDS are concerned. Compared with patients who did not fall, those who fell were significantly younger and shorter and their weights were lower. The POFS identified 85 patients with high and 216 with low falling risk, the two subgroups being comparable for BMI and BMI-SDS. Compared with patients with low fall-risk, those with high fall-risk were significantly younger and shorter and their weights were lower. The sensitivity of the POFS was 61.4%, while the specificity was 77.4%. The positive predictive value of the POFS was 31.8%, while the negative predictive value was 92.1%. The analyses of each POFS component did not show significant differences between fallers and non-fallers in terms of BMI-SDS and equilibrium test. Compared with patients who did not fall, those who fell were significantly younger, experienced a fall during the 3 months prior the admission in hospital and their total POFS score was higher.

Practice Implications

Preventing falls in hospitalized obese pediatric patients is challenging due to the markedly increased risk of this population and specific fall-risk assessment tools are required to early identify patients who needs more care, attention, and specific nursing/medical interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在301名住院肥胖儿童和青少年中使用儿童肥胖降低风险量表(POFS
目的跌倒对住院患者有重大的安全风险,但迄今为止关于其在肥胖儿童中的重要性的证据很少。本研究的目的是确定小儿肥胖跌倒风险量表(POFS)是否能够区分住院肥胖儿科患者跌倒的高风险和低风险,评估其敏感性和特异性,并分析所考虑的危险因素是否与跌倒事件有关。设计与方法本研究样本包括301名因体重减轻计划住院的儿童和青少年。在这项为期12个月的研究中,14.6%的患者在住院期间跌倒,每1000个病人日的跌倒率在第一个6个月为5.33,在第二个6个月为4.36。POFS的组成包括实足年龄、跌倒史、体重指数标准偏差评分(BMI-SDS)和维持平衡的能力。结果在BMI和BMI- sds方面,降血压者与非降血压者无显著差异。与没有摔倒的患者相比,摔倒的患者明显更年轻、更矮,体重也更低。POFS确定了85例高跌倒风险患者和216例低跌倒风险患者,两个亚组在BMI和BMI- sds方面具有可比性。与低跌倒风险患者相比,高跌倒风险患者明显更年轻、更矮、体重更低。pfs的敏感性为61.4%,特异性为77.4%。POFS阳性预测值为31.8%,阴性预测值为92.1%。在BMI-SDS和平衡检验方面,每个POFS成分的分析在跌倒者和非跌倒者之间没有显着差异。与未跌倒的患者相比,跌倒的患者明显更年轻,在入院前3个月内经历过跌倒,其总POFS评分更高。实践意义预防住院肥胖儿童患者跌倒是一项挑战,因为这一人群的风险明显增加,需要特定的跌倒风险评估工具来早期识别需要更多护理、关注和特定护理/医疗干预的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Linking science and practice by publishing evidence-based information on pediatric nursing and answering the question, ''How might this information affect nursing practice?'' The Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing (JSPN) is the international evidence-based practice journal for nurses who specialize in the care of children and families. JSPN bridges the gap between research and practice by publishing peer-reviewed reliable, clinically relevant, and readily applicable evidence. The journal integrates the best evidence with pediatric nurses'' passion for achieving the best outcomes. The journal values interdisciplinary perspectives and publishes a wide variety of peer-reviewed papers on clinically relevant topics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Identifying actions taken by health care professionals during procedures involving children with autism spectrum disorders in a high technological environment: Using critical incident technique Factors influencing job stress in pediatric nurses during the pandemic period: Focusing on fatigue, pediatric nurse−parent partnership Issue Information Sexuality education for school-aged children and adolescents: A concept analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1