Lab-based feasibility and acceptability of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in hip osteoarthritis rehabilitation.

IF 2 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering Pub Date : 2021-03-16 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2055668320980613
Louise C Burgess, Paul Taylor, Thomas W Wainwright, Ian D Swain
{"title":"Lab-based feasibility and acceptability of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in hip osteoarthritis rehabilitation.","authors":"Louise C Burgess, Paul Taylor, Thomas W Wainwright, Ian D Swain","doi":"10.1177/2055668320980613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) could provide an alternative or adjunct treatment modality to induce muscle hypertrophy in the hip osteoarthritis population. This preliminary study evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of NMES to evoke involuntary muscle contractions in adults with advanced hip osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen adults with moderate-to-severe hip osteoarthritis and fifteen healthy, older adults were invited to a lab-based testing session. NMES was applied unilaterally to the knee extensors and hip abductors for one continuous, five-minute testing session. Data were collected on device acceptability, tolerability and muscle contractile force, and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Electrical stimulation of the knee extensors elicited a visible muscular contraction in 11 participants (85%) with hip osteoarthritis and 15 controls (100%) at an intensity acceptable to the participant. Electrical stimulation of the hip abductors elicited a muscular contraction in eight participants (62%) with osteoarthritis, and ten controls (67%). Muscle contractile force, pain, discomfort and acceptability did not differ between groups, however NMES of the knee extensors was favoured across all measures of assessment when compared to the hip abductors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Electrical stimulation of the knee extensors may be a feasible and acceptable treatment modality to address muscle atrophy in adults with advanced hip osteoarthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"8 ","pages":"2055668320980613"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7970175/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2055668320980613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) could provide an alternative or adjunct treatment modality to induce muscle hypertrophy in the hip osteoarthritis population. This preliminary study evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of NMES to evoke involuntary muscle contractions in adults with advanced hip osteoarthritis.

Methods: Thirteen adults with moderate-to-severe hip osteoarthritis and fifteen healthy, older adults were invited to a lab-based testing session. NMES was applied unilaterally to the knee extensors and hip abductors for one continuous, five-minute testing session. Data were collected on device acceptability, tolerability and muscle contractile force, and compared between groups.

Results: Electrical stimulation of the knee extensors elicited a visible muscular contraction in 11 participants (85%) with hip osteoarthritis and 15 controls (100%) at an intensity acceptable to the participant. Electrical stimulation of the hip abductors elicited a muscular contraction in eight participants (62%) with osteoarthritis, and ten controls (67%). Muscle contractile force, pain, discomfort and acceptability did not differ between groups, however NMES of the knee extensors was favoured across all measures of assessment when compared to the hip abductors.

Conclusions: Electrical stimulation of the knee extensors may be a feasible and acceptable treatment modality to address muscle atrophy in adults with advanced hip osteoarthritis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于实验室的神经肌肉电刺激在髋关节骨关节炎康复中的可行性和可接受性。
简介:神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)可作为一种替代或辅助治疗方式,诱导髋关节骨关节炎患者肌肉肥大。这项初步研究评估了神经肌肉电刺激唤起晚期髋关节骨关节炎成人非自主肌肉收缩的可行性和可接受性:方法:邀请 13 名患有中重度髋关节骨关节炎的成年人和 15 名健康的老年人参加实验室测试。单侧对膝关节伸肌和髋关节外展肌施加 NMES,连续测试五分钟。收集的数据包括设备的可接受性、耐受性和肌肉收缩力,并进行组间比较:结果:对 11 名髋关节骨性关节炎患者(85%)和 15 名对照组患者(100%)的膝关节伸肌进行电刺激,可引起明显的肌肉收缩,刺激强度为患者可接受。电刺激髋关节外展肌可引起 8 名骨关节炎患者(62%)和 10 名对照组患者(67%)的肌肉收缩。肌肉收缩力、疼痛感、不适感和可接受性在不同组别之间并无差异,但与髋关节外展肌相比,膝关节外展肌的 NMES 在所有评估指标中都更受青睐:结论:对于患有晚期髋关节骨性关节炎的成年人来说,电刺激膝关节伸肌可能是解决肌肉萎缩问题的一种可行且可接受的治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Inclusive design and usability testing: Involving an end-user in developing augmentative and alternative communication user interfaces using an open-source platform. The development of a wearable goggle echolocation device to support people who are visually impaired with unhindered and unaided movement. Students perspectives on the development and deployment of an AI-enabled service robot in long-term care. Real-time evaluation of an automated computer vision system to monitor pain behavior in older adults. People with spinal cord injury or stroke are able to reach moderate-to-vigorous intensity while exercising on an end-effector robot assisted gait trainer: A pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1