Process simulation and optimisation for acid gas removal system in natural gas processing

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104764
Yick Eu Chew , Zulfan Adi Putra , Dominic C.Y. Foo
{"title":"Process simulation and optimisation for acid gas removal system in natural gas processing","authors":"Yick Eu Chew ,&nbsp;Zulfan Adi Putra ,&nbsp;Dominic C.Y. Foo","doi":"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Acid gases such as hydrogen sulphide (H</span><sub>2</sub>S) and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub><span><span>) are abundant in natural gas, which affect the economics of plant operations and the environment. Chemical absorption<span><span> is one of the most established technologies for </span>acid gas removal<span>. However, it suffers with a major drawback, i.e. high energy consumption. In this work, an integrated simulation-optimisation approach was employed to minimise energy consumption and hence operating cost in an acid gas removal (AGR) system for natural gas processing. The integrated approach made use of commercial simulation software Aspen HYSYS and optimisation software LINGO to establish a </span></span></span>surrogate model<span> that has the best operating conditions while satisfying sales gas requirements. Operational parameters such as alkanolamine flowrates<span>, absorber pressure, and alkanolamine temperature were taken into account. Moreover, Pareto analysis is carried out for multi-objective optimisation in maximising profit and minimising CO</span></span></span><sub>2</sub><span> content. The integrated approach was demonstrated on a case study involving an AGR system in a natural gas processing plant. Results showed that with the optimal operating conditions, profit of the plant is predicted to increase by 9.15% for the same CO</span><sub>2</sub> basis (i.e. 0.77 mol%); the profit is expected to increase by 23.3% at higher CO<sub>2</sub> content (i.e. 1 mol%). It was observed that the maximum profit and minimum CO<sub>2</sub> content is achieved at amine recirculation rate of 1914.49 m<sup>3</sup>/h, pressure of 54 kg/cm<sup>2</sup>, and temperature of 49.54 °C. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis illustrated that profit is proportional to the sweet gas price whereas electricity cost is the most vital parameter in reducing the overall profitability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187551002200350X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Acid gases such as hydrogen sulphide (H2S) and carbon dioxide (CO2) are abundant in natural gas, which affect the economics of plant operations and the environment. Chemical absorption is one of the most established technologies for acid gas removal. However, it suffers with a major drawback, i.e. high energy consumption. In this work, an integrated simulation-optimisation approach was employed to minimise energy consumption and hence operating cost in an acid gas removal (AGR) system for natural gas processing. The integrated approach made use of commercial simulation software Aspen HYSYS and optimisation software LINGO to establish a surrogate model that has the best operating conditions while satisfying sales gas requirements. Operational parameters such as alkanolamine flowrates, absorber pressure, and alkanolamine temperature were taken into account. Moreover, Pareto analysis is carried out for multi-objective optimisation in maximising profit and minimising CO2 content. The integrated approach was demonstrated on a case study involving an AGR system in a natural gas processing plant. Results showed that with the optimal operating conditions, profit of the plant is predicted to increase by 9.15% for the same CO2 basis (i.e. 0.77 mol%); the profit is expected to increase by 23.3% at higher CO2 content (i.e. 1 mol%). It was observed that the maximum profit and minimum CO2 content is achieved at amine recirculation rate of 1914.49 m3/h, pressure of 54 kg/cm2, and temperature of 49.54 °C. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis illustrated that profit is proportional to the sweet gas price whereas electricity cost is the most vital parameter in reducing the overall profitability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
天然气加工中酸性气体脱除系统的过程模拟与优化
天然气中含有丰富的酸性气体,如硫化氢(H2S)和二氧化碳(CO2),这些气体会影响工厂运行的经济性和环境。化学吸收是最成熟的酸性气体去除技术之一。然而,它有一个很大的缺点,即高能耗。在这项工作中,采用了一种集成的模拟优化方法,以最大限度地降低天然气处理酸性气体去除(AGR)系统的能耗,从而降低运行成本。该方法利用商业仿真软件Aspen HYSYS和优化软件LINGO建立了一个代理模型,该模型在满足销售气体要求的同时具有最佳运行条件。操作参数,如烷醇胺流量,吸收器压力和烷醇胺温度考虑在内。此外,对利润最大化和二氧化碳含量最小化的多目标优化进行了帕累托分析。以天然气处理厂的AGR系统为例,对集成方法进行了验证。结果表明,在最佳操作条件下,相同CO2浓度(0.77 mol%)下,工厂利润可提高9.15%;在较高的二氧化碳含量(即1mol %)下,利润预计将增加23.3%。结果表明,当氨循环速率为1914.49 m3/h,压力为54 kg/cm2,温度为49.54℃时,可获得最大的利润和最小的CO2含量。此外,敏感性分析表明,利润与低硫气价格成正比,而电力成本是降低整体盈利能力的最重要参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering ENERGY & FUELS-ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering and the science of natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of natural gas science and engineering from the reservoir to the market. An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering covers the fields of natural gas exploration, production, processing and transmission in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of natural gas; natural gas geochemistry; gas-reservoir engineering; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced gas recovery; thermodynamics and phase behaviour, gas-reservoir modelling and simulation; natural gas production engineering; primary and enhanced production from unconventional gas resources, subsurface issues related to coalbed methane, tight gas, shale gas, and hydrate production, formation evaluation; exploration methods, multiphase flow and flow assurance issues, novel processing (e.g., subsea) techniques, raw gas transmission methods, gas processing/LNG technologies, sales gas transmission and storage. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering will also focus on economical, environmental, management and safety issues related to natural gas production, processing and transportation.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Machine learning for drilling applications: A review Quantitative characterization of methane adsorption in shale using low-field NMR Dual mechanisms of matrix shrinkage affecting permeability evolution and gas production in coal reservoirs: Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation Experimental study on the effect of hydrate reformation on gas permeability of marine sediments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1