{"title":"Truth in numbers? Emancipation, race, and federal census statistics in the debates over Black mental health in the United States, 1840–1900","authors":"Élodie Grossi","doi":"10.1016/j.endeavour.2021.100766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To the keen observer of American political and medical history, a disturbing set of debates surrounded the sanity of free Black residents of the United States of America after the publication of the controversial 1840 census returns on race and insanity. This article analyzes how the census became a battlefield where physicians and other commentators fought over—and thus shaped—various political meanings of Black insanity before and after the American Civil War, up until the 1890s, as the South underwent a massive political and social transformation, from slavery to emancipation. It also highlights the arguments raised by authors such as James McCune Smith and Ramón de la Sagra who attempted to disprove the returns shortly after their publication, and whose arguments contributed to efforts to combat scientific racism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.endeavour.2021.100766","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160932721000211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
To the keen observer of American political and medical history, a disturbing set of debates surrounded the sanity of free Black residents of the United States of America after the publication of the controversial 1840 census returns on race and insanity. This article analyzes how the census became a battlefield where physicians and other commentators fought over—and thus shaped—various political meanings of Black insanity before and after the American Civil War, up until the 1890s, as the South underwent a massive political and social transformation, from slavery to emancipation. It also highlights the arguments raised by authors such as James McCune Smith and Ramón de la Sagra who attempted to disprove the returns shortly after their publication, and whose arguments contributed to efforts to combat scientific racism.
对于美国政治和医疗历史的敏锐观察者来说,在1840年关于种族和精神错乱的有争议的人口普查报告公布后,围绕着美国自由黑人居民的精神状况,出现了一系列令人不安的争论。本文分析了人口普查如何成为一个战场,医生和其他评论员在美国内战前后(直到19世纪90年代,南方经历了从奴隶制到解放的大规模政治和社会转型)争论黑人精神错乱的各种政治意义,从而塑造了黑人精神错乱的各种政治意义。它还强调了詹姆斯·麦克恩·史密斯(James McCune Smith)和Ramón德拉·萨格拉(Ramón de la Sagra)等作者提出的论点,他们在报告发表后不久就试图反驳报告,他们的论点有助于打击科学种族主义。