Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics

Zoya Grigoryan , Michael J. Shen , Shaina W. Twardus , Marc M. Beuttler , Lea Ann Chen , Alison Bateman-House
{"title":"Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics","authors":"Zoya Grigoryan ,&nbsp;Michael J. Shen ,&nbsp;Shaina W. Twardus ,&nbsp;Marc M. Beuttler ,&nbsp;Lea Ann Chen ,&nbsp;Alison Bateman-House","doi":"10.1016/j.medmic.2020.100027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has rapidly grown in notoriety and popularity worldwide as a treatment for both recurrent and refractory <em>C. difficile</em> infection (CDI), as well as for a myriad of other indications, with varying levels of evidence to justify its use. At present, FMT use in the U.S. has not received marketing approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but is permitted under “enforcement discretion” for CDI not responding to standard therapy. Meanwhile, the rising interest in the gut microbiome throughout mainstream media has paved the way for “do-it-yourself” (DIY) adaptations of the procedure. This access and unregulated use, often outside any clinical supervision, has quickly outpaced the medical community's research and regulatory efforts. While some studies have been able to demonstrate the success of FMT in treating conditions other than CDI—studies on ulcerative colitis have been particularly promising—little is still known about the treatment's mechanism of action or long-term side effects. Likewise, screening of donor stool is in its early stages in terms of protocol standardization. In this paper, we explore the regulatory and ethical concerns that arise from the need to balance access to a nascent but promising innovative treatment with the need for research into its efficacy, risk profile, and long-term impact.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36019,"journal":{"name":"Medicine in Microecology","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100027"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.medmic.2020.100027","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine in Microecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590097820300240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has rapidly grown in notoriety and popularity worldwide as a treatment for both recurrent and refractory C. difficile infection (CDI), as well as for a myriad of other indications, with varying levels of evidence to justify its use. At present, FMT use in the U.S. has not received marketing approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but is permitted under “enforcement discretion” for CDI not responding to standard therapy. Meanwhile, the rising interest in the gut microbiome throughout mainstream media has paved the way for “do-it-yourself” (DIY) adaptations of the procedure. This access and unregulated use, often outside any clinical supervision, has quickly outpaced the medical community's research and regulatory efforts. While some studies have been able to demonstrate the success of FMT in treating conditions other than CDI—studies on ulcerative colitis have been particularly promising—little is still known about the treatment's mechanism of action or long-term side effects. Likewise, screening of donor stool is in its early stages in terms of protocol standardization. In this paper, we explore the regulatory and ethical concerns that arise from the need to balance access to a nascent but promising innovative treatment with the need for research into its efficacy, risk profile, and long-term impact.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粪便微生物群移植:用途、问题和伦理
粪便微生物群移植(FMT)作为一种治疗复发性和难治性艰难梭菌感染(CDI)以及无数其他适应症的方法,在世界范围内迅速臭名昭著和普及,有不同程度的证据证明其使用是合理的。目前,FMT在美国的使用尚未获得美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的上市许可,但在CDI对标准治疗无反应的“强制裁量权”下是允许的。与此同时,主流媒体对肠道微生物组的兴趣日益浓厚,为“自己动手”(DIY)适应该程序铺平了道路。这种获取和不受管制的使用,往往在任何临床监督之外,已经迅速超过了医学界的研究和监管努力。虽然一些研究已经能够证明FMT在治疗cdi以外的疾病方面取得了成功-溃疡性结肠炎的研究尤其有希望-但对于治疗的作用机制或长期副作用仍然知之甚少。同样,供体粪便的筛查在方案标准化方面处于早期阶段。在本文中,我们探讨了监管和伦理问题,这些问题是由于需要平衡获得一种新兴但有前途的创新治疗与研究其疗效、风险状况和长期影响的需要而产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine in Microecology
Medicine in Microecology Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
76 days
期刊最新文献
Contagious illness of tuberculosis and correlation with various types of cancer Impact of macrolide antibiotics on gut microbiota diversity with age-specific implications and scientific insights Alterations of gut microbiota during the development of a hyperuricemia rat model Potential therapeutic solution for Clostridioides difficile infection: Current scenario and future prospects Diagnostic ability of myxovirus resistance-A in pediatric cases of viral-acute respiratory tract infections with vitamin A and zinc deficiencies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1