The efficacy of radiofrequency, intense pulsed light and carboxytherapy in facial rejuvenation.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy Pub Date : 2020-11-16 Epub Date: 2021-04-12 DOI:10.1080/14764172.2021.1880598
Samia Nassar, Mai Assem, Dareen Mohamed, Ghada Hassan
{"title":"The efficacy of radiofrequency, intense pulsed light and carboxytherapy in facial rejuvenation.","authors":"Samia Nassar,&nbsp;Mai Assem,&nbsp;Dareen Mohamed,&nbsp;Ghada Hassan","doi":"10.1080/14764172.2021.1880598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Skin aging may be divided into intrinsic and extrinsic aging or photoaging. The first is a natural, slow and gradual process. The second is exacerbated by environmental factors such as improper exposure to sunlight. There are a myriad of therapeutic modalities that can improve photoaging. Intense pulsed light, radiofrequency and carboxytherapy are good procedural modalities to improve skin aging. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of IPL, RF, and carboxytherapy in facial rejuvenation. This study included 60 patients with facial wrinkles. Patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 was treated with IPL, group 2 was treated with radiofrequency while group 3 was treated with carboxytherapy. All patients received four sessions with 3-4 week interval and followed up after 3 months after the end of treatment. Patients were assessed by digital photographing and skin biopsies before and after treatment. There was a significant difference in the percentage of improvement and patients' satisfaction with more significance in group 1, followed by group 3 then group 2. IPL was the more effective, followed by carboxytherapy then RF at the end in facial rejuvenation. These results were confirmed by immunohistochemical expression of MMP1.</p>","PeriodicalId":54852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy","volume":"22 6-8","pages":"256-264"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14764172.2021.1880598","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2021.1880598","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Skin aging may be divided into intrinsic and extrinsic aging or photoaging. The first is a natural, slow and gradual process. The second is exacerbated by environmental factors such as improper exposure to sunlight. There are a myriad of therapeutic modalities that can improve photoaging. Intense pulsed light, radiofrequency and carboxytherapy are good procedural modalities to improve skin aging. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of IPL, RF, and carboxytherapy in facial rejuvenation. This study included 60 patients with facial wrinkles. Patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 was treated with IPL, group 2 was treated with radiofrequency while group 3 was treated with carboxytherapy. All patients received four sessions with 3-4 week interval and followed up after 3 months after the end of treatment. Patients were assessed by digital photographing and skin biopsies before and after treatment. There was a significant difference in the percentage of improvement and patients' satisfaction with more significance in group 1, followed by group 3 then group 2. IPL was the more effective, followed by carboxytherapy then RF at the end in facial rejuvenation. These results were confirmed by immunohistochemical expression of MMP1.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
射频、强脉冲光和羧酸疗法在面部年轻化中的疗效。
皮肤老化可分为内在老化和外在老化或光老化。第一种是自然、缓慢和渐进的过程。第二种是由环境因素加剧的,比如不适当的阳光照射。有无数的治疗方式可以改善光老化。强脉冲光,射频和羧基治疗是改善皮肤老化的良好程序方式。本研究旨在评估和比较IPL、RF和羧酸疗法在面部年轻化中的疗效和安全性。这项研究包括60名面部皱纹患者。患者分为三组。组1采用IPL治疗,组2采用射频治疗,组3采用羧基治疗。所有患者均接受4次治疗,间隔3-4周,治疗结束后3个月随访。患者在治疗前后通过数码摄影和皮肤活检进行评估。两组患者满意率差异均有统计学意义,其中组1差异较大,组3差异较大,组2差异较大。在面部年轻化方面,IPL更有效,其次是羧酸疗法,最后是射频疗法。MMP1的免疫组化表达证实了上述结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A unique journal that focuses on the application of cosmetic laser and light therapies on the skin. The Journal of Cosmetic & Laser Therapy provides a forum for stimulating and up-to-date studies demonstrating the wide range of therapeutic options for clinicians and surgeons involved in cosmetic and dermatological treatment. The journal is aimed at dermatologists, cosmetic surgeons, plastic and facial plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and all those interested in the rapidly expanding field of cosmetic and laser therapy. Features include: -Cosmetic surgery, including facial rejuvenation, hair removal and skin resurfacing -Use of lasers and other light sources for cosmetic and dermatological treatment -Applications of peeling agents, fillers, injectables, implants and other cosmetic modalities -Topical treatments -Practical tips and safety issues
期刊最新文献
A clinical study on the efficacy of high frequency therapy on nasolabial and periorbital wrinkles. Pulsed dye laser in jellyfish-induced keloids. A case of resistant granuloma faciale successfully treated with ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser. A comparison of surgical scar treatment using various combinations of autologous fat, hyaluronic acid and resurfacing with the 1540 nm non-ablative Erbium laser - a prospective pilot study. Intralesional vitamin D3 versus intralesional triamcinolone acetonoid in patchy alopecia areata: a comparative clinical and dermoscopic study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1