Characteristic functional networks in high- versus low-proficiency second language speakers detected also during native language processing: An explorative EEG coherence study in 6 frequency bands

Susanne Reiterer , Claudia Hemmelmann , Peter Rappelsberger , Michael L. Berger
{"title":"Characteristic functional networks in high- versus low-proficiency second language speakers detected also during native language processing: An explorative EEG coherence study in 6 frequency bands","authors":"Susanne Reiterer ,&nbsp;Claudia Hemmelmann ,&nbsp;Peter Rappelsberger ,&nbsp;Michael L. Berger","doi":"10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An EEG coherence study was performed with a twofold objective: first, to scrutinize the theoretical concept of “cortical efficiency” in connection with second language (L2) acquisition and, second, to detect cooperations between cortical areas in specific frequency bands indicative for highly proficient L2 processing. Two groups differing only in their level of L2 proficiency were contrasted during presentation of natural language videos in English (L2) and German (native language, L1), with explorative coherence analysis in 6 frequency bands (0.5–31.5 Hz). The coherence brain maps revealed more pronounced and widespread increases in coherences in the α1-band (8–10 Hz) in low-proficiency than in the high-proficiency L2 speakers. Surprisingly, this difference was obtained also during L1 processing and corroborated for both languages by multivariate permutation tests. These tests revealed additional differences between the low- and the high-proficiency group also for coherences within the β1- (13–18 Hz) and the β2-band (18.5–31.5 Hz), again during L2 and L1 processing. Since the same group differences were observed during L1 and L2 processing, our high-proficiency group might have profited from a more generic advantage in language or text processing strategy. This strategic advantage was most evident at α1 frequencies, possibly related to a specific way of processing internal mental states (top-down processing).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100287,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Brain Research","volume":"25 2","pages":"Pages 566-578"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.010","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092664100500234X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

An EEG coherence study was performed with a twofold objective: first, to scrutinize the theoretical concept of “cortical efficiency” in connection with second language (L2) acquisition and, second, to detect cooperations between cortical areas in specific frequency bands indicative for highly proficient L2 processing. Two groups differing only in their level of L2 proficiency were contrasted during presentation of natural language videos in English (L2) and German (native language, L1), with explorative coherence analysis in 6 frequency bands (0.5–31.5 Hz). The coherence brain maps revealed more pronounced and widespread increases in coherences in the α1-band (8–10 Hz) in low-proficiency than in the high-proficiency L2 speakers. Surprisingly, this difference was obtained also during L1 processing and corroborated for both languages by multivariate permutation tests. These tests revealed additional differences between the low- and the high-proficiency group also for coherences within the β1- (13–18 Hz) and the β2-band (18.5–31.5 Hz), again during L2 and L1 processing. Since the same group differences were observed during L1 and L2 processing, our high-proficiency group might have profited from a more generic advantage in language or text processing strategy. This strategic advantage was most evident at α1 frequencies, possibly related to a specific way of processing internal mental states (top-down processing).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高熟练程度和低熟练程度的第二语言使用者在母语处理过程中也检测到特征功能网络:6个频段的探索性脑电图一致性研究
一项EEG一致性研究有两个目的:首先,仔细研究与第二语言习得有关的“皮层效率”的理论概念;其次,检测特定频段皮层区域之间的合作,表明高度熟练的第二语言处理。在用英语(L2)和德语(母语,L1)播放自然语言视频时,对比两组仅在L2熟练程度上存在差异的学生,并对6个频段(0.5-31.5 Hz)进行探索性相干性分析。连贯性脑图显示,与高水平的第二语言使用者相比,低水平的第二语言使用者α1波段(8-10 Hz)的连贯性增加更为明显和广泛。令人惊讶的是,这种差异在L1处理过程中也得到了证实,并通过多变量排列测试证实了这两种语言的差异。这些测试还揭示了在L2和L1处理过程中,低熟练组和高熟练组在β1- (13-18 Hz)和β2- (18.5-31.5 Hz)频带内的一致性方面的其他差异。由于在第一语言和第二语言处理过程中观察到相同的组间差异,我们的高熟练组可能从语言或文本处理策略中获得了更普遍的优势。这种战略优势在α1频率上最为明显,可能与处理内部心理状态的特定方式(自上而下的处理)有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Author Index Optic flow dominates visual scene polarity in causing adaptive modification of locomotor trajectory Partial unilateral inactivation of the dorsal hippocampus impairs spatial memory in the MWM Accessing world knowledge: Evidence from N400 and reaction time priming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1