Kathleen W. Beekman , Mark T. Fleming , Howard I. Scher , Susan F. Slovin , Nicole M. Ishill , Glenn Heller , W. Kevin Kelly
{"title":"Second-Line Chemotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Patient Characteristics and Survival","authors":"Kathleen W. Beekman , Mark T. Fleming , Howard I. Scher , Susan F. Slovin , Nicole M. Ishill , Glenn Heller , W. Kevin Kelly","doi":"10.3816/CGC.2005.n.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>First-line chemotherapy with docetaxel in patients with progressive castrate metastatic prostate cancer has been shown to improve overall survival compared with mitoxantrone-based therapies. The use and outcomes of chemotherapy after first-line antimicrotubule-based therapy have not been well described.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>Patients with progressive castrate metastatic prostate cancer enrolled on an antimicrotubule-based protocol for treatment were followed to determine their baseline characteristics and outcomes with second- or third-line systemic therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 108 patients treated with antimicrotubulebased therapy, 81% received second-line therapy, and 40% received third-line therapies. Corresponding prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decreases ≥ 50% were observed in 72%, 15%, and 22% of patients. Median survival times from the start of first-, second-, and third-line therapy were 21 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18-25 months), 13 months (95% CI, 10-15 months) and 12 months (95% CI, 9-19 months). Significant prognostic indicators for survival in the second-line setting include pretreatment PSA level, alkaline phosphatase level, and performance status. Patients not fit to receive second-line therapy were more symptomatic with first-line therapy, as illustrated by a greater need for narcotic therapy (67% vs. 15%) and palliative radiation therapy after first-line therapy (57% vs. 10%) in lieu of second-line systemic therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Eighty percent of patients received second-line chemotherapy, with a median survival of 12 months from the start of second-line treatment. Although only 40% received third-line chemotherapy, median survival was similar to that of patients in the second-line setting. Our data show that patients who initiate chemotherapy with symptoms are more likely to require palliative radiation therapy rather than chemotherapy as second-line therapy. A sequential or continuous administration of therapy may optimize the care of this subset of symptomatic patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87076,"journal":{"name":"Clinical prostate cancer","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 86-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3816/CGC.2005.n.015","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical prostate cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1540035211701056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33
Abstract
Purpose
First-line chemotherapy with docetaxel in patients with progressive castrate metastatic prostate cancer has been shown to improve overall survival compared with mitoxantrone-based therapies. The use and outcomes of chemotherapy after first-line antimicrotubule-based therapy have not been well described.
Patients and Methods
Patients with progressive castrate metastatic prostate cancer enrolled on an antimicrotubule-based protocol for treatment were followed to determine their baseline characteristics and outcomes with second- or third-line systemic therapy.
Results
Of 108 patients treated with antimicrotubulebased therapy, 81% received second-line therapy, and 40% received third-line therapies. Corresponding prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decreases ≥ 50% were observed in 72%, 15%, and 22% of patients. Median survival times from the start of first-, second-, and third-line therapy were 21 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18-25 months), 13 months (95% CI, 10-15 months) and 12 months (95% CI, 9-19 months). Significant prognostic indicators for survival in the second-line setting include pretreatment PSA level, alkaline phosphatase level, and performance status. Patients not fit to receive second-line therapy were more symptomatic with first-line therapy, as illustrated by a greater need for narcotic therapy (67% vs. 15%) and palliative radiation therapy after first-line therapy (57% vs. 10%) in lieu of second-line systemic therapy.
Conclusion
Eighty percent of patients received second-line chemotherapy, with a median survival of 12 months from the start of second-line treatment. Although only 40% received third-line chemotherapy, median survival was similar to that of patients in the second-line setting. Our data show that patients who initiate chemotherapy with symptoms are more likely to require palliative radiation therapy rather than chemotherapy as second-line therapy. A sequential or continuous administration of therapy may optimize the care of this subset of symptomatic patients.