Measurement and choice of drinking outcome variables in the COMBINE Study.

Raymond E Anton, Carrie L Randall
{"title":"Measurement and choice of drinking outcome variables in the COMBINE Study.","authors":"Raymond E Anton,&nbsp;Carrie L Randall","doi":"10.15288/jsas.2005.s15.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The COMBINE Study, a federally funded multisite clinical trial, endeavored to choose drinking and related outcome variables that were scientifically sound and had both convergent validity with previously published studies and face validity for clinical meaning. This article describes these variables and the methods used to collect them.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In choosing the primary outcome drinking variables, the mechanisms of action of naltrexone and acamprosate were considered along with previously published results for them and the psychosocial therapies utilized (Project MATCH). In addition, enough previous data were required to abstract meaningful power calculations for sample size estimates. Attention was paid to methodological detail in collection of drinking data, and confirmatory biological variables (carbohydrate deficient transferrin and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase) were incorporated into the study design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Daily standard drinks were collected by calendar-based methods with a stated goal of 90% within-treatment drinking data to be collected. \"Percentage of days abstinent\" and \"time to first heavy drinking day\" were chosen as primary outcome variables. Standardized daily alcohol consumption data can be applied to various statistical approaches, including hierarchical linear modeling and multiple relapse event analyses, which can evaluate a progression of improvement or worsening over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trained individuals using calendar-based methods attempting to collect all daily drinking data, independent of treatment dropout, should enhance interpretive validity of treatment differences. Convergence of drinking data with biological marker changes, quality of life, craving and health services utilization will enhance the overall validity of both the within-treatment and the posttreatment results for the COMBINE Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":17056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement","volume":" 15","pages":"104-9; discussion 92-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15288/jsas.2005.s15.104","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsas.2005.s15.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Objective: The COMBINE Study, a federally funded multisite clinical trial, endeavored to choose drinking and related outcome variables that were scientifically sound and had both convergent validity with previously published studies and face validity for clinical meaning. This article describes these variables and the methods used to collect them.

Method: In choosing the primary outcome drinking variables, the mechanisms of action of naltrexone and acamprosate were considered along with previously published results for them and the psychosocial therapies utilized (Project MATCH). In addition, enough previous data were required to abstract meaningful power calculations for sample size estimates. Attention was paid to methodological detail in collection of drinking data, and confirmatory biological variables (carbohydrate deficient transferrin and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase) were incorporated into the study design.

Results: Daily standard drinks were collected by calendar-based methods with a stated goal of 90% within-treatment drinking data to be collected. "Percentage of days abstinent" and "time to first heavy drinking day" were chosen as primary outcome variables. Standardized daily alcohol consumption data can be applied to various statistical approaches, including hierarchical linear modeling and multiple relapse event analyses, which can evaluate a progression of improvement or worsening over time.

Conclusions: Trained individuals using calendar-based methods attempting to collect all daily drinking data, independent of treatment dropout, should enhance interpretive validity of treatment differences. Convergence of drinking data with biological marker changes, quality of life, craving and health services utilization will enhance the overall validity of both the within-treatment and the posttreatment results for the COMBINE Study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMBINE研究中饮酒结果变量的测量和选择。
目的:COMBINE研究是一项由联邦政府资助的多地点临床试验,旨在选择科学合理、与先前发表的研究具有收敛效度和临床意义的面部效度的饮酒及相关结果变量。本文描述了这些变量以及用于收集它们的方法。方法:在选择主要结果饮酒变量时,考虑了纳曲酮和阿坎普罗酸的作用机制以及先前发表的关于它们和所使用的心理社会治疗的结果(项目MATCH)。此外,需要足够的先前数据来抽象有意义的功率计算以估计样本量。在收集饮用数据时,我们注意了方法上的细节,并将验证性生物学变量(碳水化合物缺乏转铁蛋白和γ谷氨酰转肽酶)纳入研究设计。结果:采用基于日历的方法收集每日标准饮酒量,目标是收集90%的治疗内饮酒数据。“戒酒天数的百分比”和“到第一次酗酒的时间”被选为主要结果变量。标准化的每日酒精消费数据可以应用于各种统计方法,包括分层线性模型和多次复发事件分析,可以评估随着时间的推移改善或恶化的进展。结论:训练有素的个体使用基于日历的方法试图收集所有每日饮酒数据,独立于治疗退出,应提高治疗差异的解释有效性。饮酒数据与生物标志物变化、生活质量、渴望和健康服务利用的融合将提高COMBINE研究治疗内和治疗后结果的整体有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Origins, issues and options in the development of the combined behavioral intervention. Training, supervision and quality monitoring of the COMBINE Study behavioral interventions. Developing a baseline assessment battery: balancing patient time burden with essential clinical and research monitoring. Measurement and choice of drinking outcome variables in the COMBINE Study. Assessing nondrinking outcomes in combined pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy clinical trials for the treatment of alcohol dependence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1