BCRABL transcript detection by quantitative real-time PCR : are correlated results possible from homebrew assays?

Sallyanne C Fossey, Andrea Ferreira-Gonzalez, Carleton T Garrett, Catherine I Dumur, Cindy L Vnencak-Jones
{"title":"BCRABL transcript detection by quantitative real-time PCR : are correlated results possible from homebrew assays?","authors":"Sallyanne C Fossey,&nbsp;Andrea Ferreira-Gonzalez,&nbsp;Carleton T Garrett,&nbsp;Catherine I Dumur,&nbsp;Cindy L Vnencak-Jones","doi":"10.1007/BF03260090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quantitative real-time PCR has become the predominant molecular technique to monitor BCRABL levels in response to treatment in Ph(+) leukemia patients. However, without some form of standardized methodology between laboratories, the correlation of results is difficult.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using TaqMan-based assays, parallel quantitative real-time PCR analysis was performed on 70 clinical specimens at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Virginia Commonwealth University. While the same positive control cell line (K562) and quality control gene (BCR) were used, the RNA isolation technique, cDNA synthesis, BCR control cell line, and PCR primer and probe sequences were different.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The detection of BCRABL-positive results spanned a dynamic range from 10(0) to 10(5)/100,000 cells. Forty-three samples were negative at both facilities. A Spearman rank correlation analysis was performed for the 22 BCRABL-positive paired results. The correlation coefficient, r(s), was 0.9435 (p < 0.00001), suggesting a strong correlation of the results. One discordant result was obtained for consecutive samples from one patient with a low BCRABL copy number as a result of a minimal RNA yield at one laboratory.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that quantitative real-time PCR assays for BCRABL detection can be comparable between laboratories despite significant differences in methodologies if the same positive control cell line and quality control gene are used. It is imperative that some level of assay standardization be adopted between laboratories, not only for patients who are monitored at different facilities, but also for larger investigative studies in which hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular responses are to be compared.</p>","PeriodicalId":79690,"journal":{"name":"Molecular diagnosis : a journal devoted to the understanding of human disease through the clinical application of molecular biology","volume":"9 4","pages":"187-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03260090","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular diagnosis : a journal devoted to the understanding of human disease through the clinical application of molecular biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03260090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Quantitative real-time PCR has become the predominant molecular technique to monitor BCRABL levels in response to treatment in Ph(+) leukemia patients. However, without some form of standardized methodology between laboratories, the correlation of results is difficult.

Methods: Using TaqMan-based assays, parallel quantitative real-time PCR analysis was performed on 70 clinical specimens at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Virginia Commonwealth University. While the same positive control cell line (K562) and quality control gene (BCR) were used, the RNA isolation technique, cDNA synthesis, BCR control cell line, and PCR primer and probe sequences were different.

Results: The detection of BCRABL-positive results spanned a dynamic range from 10(0) to 10(5)/100,000 cells. Forty-three samples were negative at both facilities. A Spearman rank correlation analysis was performed for the 22 BCRABL-positive paired results. The correlation coefficient, r(s), was 0.9435 (p < 0.00001), suggesting a strong correlation of the results. One discordant result was obtained for consecutive samples from one patient with a low BCRABL copy number as a result of a minimal RNA yield at one laboratory.

Conclusions: These results suggest that quantitative real-time PCR assays for BCRABL detection can be comparable between laboratories despite significant differences in methodologies if the same positive control cell line and quality control gene are used. It is imperative that some level of assay standardization be adopted between laboratories, not only for patients who are monitored at different facilities, but also for larger investigative studies in which hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular responses are to be compared.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实时荧光定量PCR检测BCRABL转录物:自制检测是否可能产生相关结果?
背景:实时荧光定量PCR已成为监测Ph(+)白血病患者BCRABL水平对治疗反应的主要分子技术。然而,如果实验室之间没有某种形式的标准化方法,结果的相关性是困难的。方法:采用基于taqman的方法,对范德比尔特大学医学中心和弗吉尼亚联邦大学的70例临床标本进行并行实时定量PCR分析。采用相同阳性对照细胞株K562和质量控制基因(BCR), RNA分离技术、cDNA合成、BCR对照细胞株、PCR引物和探针序列不同。结果:bcrabl阳性检测结果的动态范围为10(0)~ 10(5)/ 100000细胞。两家机构的43份样本均呈阴性。对22例bcrabl阳性配对结果进行Spearman秩相关分析。相关系数r(s)为0.9435 (p < 0.00001),相关性较强。在一个实验室中,由于RNA产量最低,从一个BCRABL拷贝数较低的患者的连续样本中获得了一个不一致的结果。结论:这些结果表明,如果使用相同的阳性对照细胞系和质量控制基因,尽管方法存在显着差异,但用于BCRABL检测的实时荧光定量PCR方法在实验室之间是可以比较的。必须在实验室之间采用某种程度的测定标准化,这不仅适用于在不同设施监测的患者,也适用于比较血液学、细胞遗传学和分子反应的大型调查研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic conferences : january-june 2006. Summary of recent deal activity. An improved method of elimination of DNA from PCR reagents. Touch-down reverse transcriptase-PCR detection of IgV(H) rearrangement and Sybr-Green-based real-time RT-PCR quantitation of minimal residual disease in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Instability of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in blood lysates: importance for PCR DNA-based diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1