A moral emergency and a medical problem: negotiating the control of venereal disease--the Saskatchewan Venereal Disease Protection Act, 1946.

Saskatchewan law review Pub Date : 2004-01-01
Lindsay M Ferguson
{"title":"A moral emergency and a medical problem: negotiating the control of venereal disease--the Saskatchewan Venereal Disease Protection Act, 1946.","authors":"Lindsay M Ferguson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The author examines Saskatchewan legislation that regulated venereal disease. Although venereal disease legislation was introduced in Saskatchewan in 1919, the centrepiece of this article is The Venereal Disease Prevention Act, 1946. In an attempt to understand the nuances of and underlying rationale for these laws, the author situates the legislation within its social context. The author demonstrates that the trends and contradictions apparent in society's approach to the regulation of venereal disease were reflected in the legislation. The concept of a continuum is used to illustrate the coexistence of two approaches to the control of venereal disease. On one side of the continuum, venereal disease was a moral problem and a taboo subject. Force was the key to controlling venereal disease; involuntary examinations and intrusions into people's personal lives were the solution. On the other side of the continuum, venereal disease was a medical problem. If approached rationally and openly, control of venereal disease was possible; through education and social acceptance of venereal disease as just another illness, people would voluntarily come forward for treatment. The approaches represented at the extreme ends of the continuum did not exist in isolation; these views existed simultaneously, producing contradictory and colourful rhetoric.</p>","PeriodicalId":82644,"journal":{"name":"Saskatchewan law review","volume":"67 1","pages":"137-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saskatchewan law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author examines Saskatchewan legislation that regulated venereal disease. Although venereal disease legislation was introduced in Saskatchewan in 1919, the centrepiece of this article is The Venereal Disease Prevention Act, 1946. In an attempt to understand the nuances of and underlying rationale for these laws, the author situates the legislation within its social context. The author demonstrates that the trends and contradictions apparent in society's approach to the regulation of venereal disease were reflected in the legislation. The concept of a continuum is used to illustrate the coexistence of two approaches to the control of venereal disease. On one side of the continuum, venereal disease was a moral problem and a taboo subject. Force was the key to controlling venereal disease; involuntary examinations and intrusions into people's personal lives were the solution. On the other side of the continuum, venereal disease was a medical problem. If approached rationally and openly, control of venereal disease was possible; through education and social acceptance of venereal disease as just another illness, people would voluntarily come forward for treatment. The approaches represented at the extreme ends of the continuum did not exist in isolation; these views existed simultaneously, producing contradictory and colourful rhetoric.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
道德紧急情况和医疗问题:协商控制性病————1946年《萨斯喀彻温省性病保护法》。
作者审查了萨斯喀彻温省管制性病的立法。虽然性病立法于1919年在萨斯喀彻温省出台,但本文的核心是1946年的《性病防治法》。为了理解这些法律的细微差别和基本原理,作者将立法置于其社会背景中。作者认为,立法反映了社会对性病管制的倾向和矛盾。连续体的概念被用来说明控制性病的两种方法的共存。一方面,性病是一个道德问题和禁忌话题。武力是控制性病的关键;非自愿的检查和侵入人们的个人生活是解决办法。另一方面,性病是一个医学问题。如果理性、公开地对待,性病的控制是可能的;通过教育和社会接受性病作为另一种疾病,人们会自愿站出来接受治疗。在连续体的极端两端所代表的方法不是孤立存在的;这些观点同时存在,产生了相互矛盾和丰富多彩的修辞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A moral emergency and a medical problem: negotiating the control of venereal disease--the Saskatchewan Venereal Disease Protection Act, 1946. Canada's Assisted Human Reproductive Act: is it scientific censorship, or a reasoned approach to the regulation of rapidly emerging reproductive technologies? Sustainability and the balancing of the health care and innovation agendas: the commercialization of genetic research. Misusing informed consent: a critique of limitations on research subjects' access to genetic research results. An examination of Saskatchewan law on the sterilization of persons with mental disabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1