Safety and reactogenicity of an MSP-1 malaria vaccine candidate: a randomized phase Ib dose-escalation trial in Kenyan children.

Mark R Withers, Denise McKinney, Bernhards R Ogutu, John N Waitumbi, Jessica B Milman, Odika J Apollo, Otieno G Allen, Kathryn Tucker, Lorraine A Soisson, Carter Diggs, Amanda Leach, Janet Wittes, Filip Dubovsky, V Ann Stewart, Shon A Remich, Joe Cohen, W Ripley Ballou, Carolyn A Holland, Jeffrey A Lyon, Evelina Angov, José A Stoute, Samuel K Martin, D Gray Heppner
{"title":"Safety and reactogenicity of an MSP-1 malaria vaccine candidate: a randomized phase Ib dose-escalation trial in Kenyan children.","authors":"Mark R Withers, Denise McKinney, Bernhards R Ogutu, John N Waitumbi, Jessica B Milman, Odika J Apollo, Otieno G Allen, Kathryn Tucker, Lorraine A Soisson, Carter Diggs, Amanda Leach, Janet Wittes, Filip Dubovsky, V Ann Stewart, Shon A Remich, Joe Cohen, W Ripley Ballou, Carolyn A Holland, Jeffrey A Lyon, Evelina Angov, José A Stoute, Samuel K Martin, D Gray Heppner","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0010032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our aim was to evaluate the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of an investigational malaria vaccine.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was an age-stratified phase Ib, double-blind, randomized, controlled, dose-escalation trial. Children were recruited into one of three cohorts (dosage groups) and randomized in 2:1 fashion to receive either the test product or a comparator.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted in a rural population in Kombewa Division, western Kenya.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Subjects were 135 children, aged 12-47 mo.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Subjects received 10, 25, or 50 microg of falciparum malaria protein 1 (FMP1) formulated in 100, 250, and 500 microL, respectively, of AS02A, or they received a comparator (Imovax (rabies vaccine).</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>We performed safety and reactogenicity parameters and assessment of adverse events during solicited (7 d) and unsolicited (30 d) periods after each vaccination. Serious adverse events were monitored for 6 mo after the last vaccination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both vaccines were safe and well tolerated. FMP1/AS02A recipients experienced significantly more pain and injection-site swelling with a dose-effect relationship. Systemic reactogenicity was low at all dose levels. Hemoglobin levels remained stable and similar across arms. Baseline geometric mean titers were comparable in all groups. Anti-FMP1 antibody titers increased in a dose-dependent manner in subjects receiving FMP1/AS02A; no increase in anti-FMP1 titers occurred in subjects who received the comparator. By study end, subjects who received either 25 or 50 microg of FMP1 had similar antibody levels, which remained significantly higher than that of those who received the comparator or 10 microg of FMP1. A longitudinal mixed effects model showed a statistically significant effect of dosage level on immune response (F(3,1047) = 10.78, or F(3, 995) = 11.22, p < 0.001); however, the comparison of 25 microg and 50 microg recipients indicated no significant difference (F(1,1047) = 0.05; p = 0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FMP1/AS02A vaccine was safe and immunogenic in malaria-exposed 12- to 47-mo-old children and the magnitude of immune response of the 25 and 50 microg doses was superior to that of the 10 microg dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1851726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of an investigational malaria vaccine.

Design: This was an age-stratified phase Ib, double-blind, randomized, controlled, dose-escalation trial. Children were recruited into one of three cohorts (dosage groups) and randomized in 2:1 fashion to receive either the test product or a comparator.

Setting: The study was conducted in a rural population in Kombewa Division, western Kenya.

Participants: Subjects were 135 children, aged 12-47 mo.

Interventions: Subjects received 10, 25, or 50 microg of falciparum malaria protein 1 (FMP1) formulated in 100, 250, and 500 microL, respectively, of AS02A, or they received a comparator (Imovax (rabies vaccine).

Outcome measures: We performed safety and reactogenicity parameters and assessment of adverse events during solicited (7 d) and unsolicited (30 d) periods after each vaccination. Serious adverse events were monitored for 6 mo after the last vaccination.

Results: Both vaccines were safe and well tolerated. FMP1/AS02A recipients experienced significantly more pain and injection-site swelling with a dose-effect relationship. Systemic reactogenicity was low at all dose levels. Hemoglobin levels remained stable and similar across arms. Baseline geometric mean titers were comparable in all groups. Anti-FMP1 antibody titers increased in a dose-dependent manner in subjects receiving FMP1/AS02A; no increase in anti-FMP1 titers occurred in subjects who received the comparator. By study end, subjects who received either 25 or 50 microg of FMP1 had similar antibody levels, which remained significantly higher than that of those who received the comparator or 10 microg of FMP1. A longitudinal mixed effects model showed a statistically significant effect of dosage level on immune response (F(3,1047) = 10.78, or F(3, 995) = 11.22, p < 0.001); however, the comparison of 25 microg and 50 microg recipients indicated no significant difference (F(1,1047) = 0.05; p = 0.82).

Conclusions: The FMP1/AS02A vaccine was safe and immunogenic in malaria-exposed 12- to 47-mo-old children and the magnitude of immune response of the 25 and 50 microg doses was superior to that of the 10 microg dose.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MSP-1 候选疟疾疫苗的安全性和致反应性:在肯尼亚儿童中进行的随机 Ib 期剂量递增试验。
目的我们的目的是评估一种研究性疟疾疫苗的安全性、致反应性和免疫原性:这是一项年龄分层的 Ib 期双盲随机对照剂量递增试验。儿童被招募到三个组群(剂量组)中的一个,并按 2:1 的比例随机分配接受试验产品或对照品:研究在肯尼亚西部 Kombewa 省的农村地区进行:受试者:135 名儿童,年龄在 12-47 个月之间:干预措施:受试者分别接受10、25或50微克恶性疟原虫疟疾蛋白1(FMP1)配制成的100、250和500微升AS02A,或者接受一种对比剂(Imovax(狂犬病疫苗)):我们在每次接种疫苗后的主动接种期(7 d)和非主动接种期(30 d)进行了安全性和致反应性参数以及不良事件评估。在最后一次接种后的 6 个月内对严重不良事件进行监测:结果:两种疫苗均安全且耐受性良好。FMP1/AS02A接种者的疼痛和注射部位肿胀明显更严重,这与剂量效应有关。所有剂量水平的全身反应性都很低。各组的血红蛋白水平保持稳定且相似。各组的基线几何平均滴度相当。在接受FMP1/AS02A治疗的受试者中,抗FMP1抗体滴度的增加呈剂量依赖性;而在接受对照组治疗的受试者中,抗FMP1抗体滴度没有增加。研究结束时,接受 25 微克或 50 微克 FMP1 治疗的受试者抗体水平相似,但仍明显高于接受对照药或 10 微克 FMP1 治疗的受试者。纵向混合效应模型显示,剂量水平对免疫反应的影响具有统计学意义(F(3,1047) = 10.78或F(3, 995) = 11.22,p <0.001);然而,25微克和50微克受试者的比较结果显示没有明显差异(F(1,1047) = 0.05; p = 0.82):结论:FMP1/AS02A疫苗对暴露于疟疾的12至47个月大的儿童是安全的,且具有免疫原性,25微克和50微克剂量的免疫反应程度优于10微克剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can biomarkers identify women at increased stroke risk? The Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trials. A cluster-randomised trial evaluating an intervention for patients with stress-related mental disorders and sick leave in primary care. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for prevention of HIV infection in women: a phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The effect of acclydine in chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Artemether-lumefantrine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for treatment of malaria: a randomized trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1