Artemether-lumefantrine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for treatment of malaria: a randomized trial.

Moses R Kamya, Adoke Yeka, Hasifa Bukirwa, Myers Lugemwa, John B Rwakimari, Sarah G Staedke, Ambrose O Talisuna, Bryan Greenhouse, François Nosten, Philip J Rosenthal, Fred Wabwire-Mangen, Grant Dorsey
{"title":"Artemether-lumefantrine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for treatment of malaria: a randomized trial.","authors":"Moses R Kamya,&nbsp;Adoke Yeka,&nbsp;Hasifa Bukirwa,&nbsp;Myers Lugemwa,&nbsp;John B Rwakimari,&nbsp;Sarah G Staedke,&nbsp;Ambrose O Talisuna,&nbsp;Bryan Greenhouse,&nbsp;François Nosten,&nbsp;Philip J Rosenthal,&nbsp;Fred Wabwire-Mangen,&nbsp;Grant Dorsey","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0020020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Uganda.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized single-blinded clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Apac, Uganda, an area of very high malaria transmission intensity.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Children aged 6 mo to 10 y with uncomplicated falciparum malaria.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Treatment of malaria with AL or DP, each following standard 3-d dosing regimens.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Risks of recurrent parasitemia at 28 and 42 d, unadjusted and adjusted by genotyping to distinguish recrudescences and new infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 421 enrolled participants, 417 (99%) completed follow-up. The unadjusted risk of recurrent falciparum parasitemia was significantly lower for participants treated with DP than for those treated with AL after 28 d (11% versus 29%; risk difference [RD] 18%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 11%-26%) and 42 d (43% versus 53%; RD 9.6%, 95% CI 0%-19%) of follow-up. Similarly, the risk of recurrent parasitemia due to possible recrudescence (adjusted by genotyping) was significantly lower for participants treated with DP than for those treated with AL after 28 d (1.9% versus 8.9%; RD 7.0%, 95% CI 2.5%-12%) and 42 d (6.9% versus 16%; RD 9.5%, 95% CI 2.8%-16%). Patients treated with DP had a lower risk of recurrent parasitemia due to non-falciparum species, development of gametocytemia, and higher mean increase in hemoglobin compared to patients treated with AL. Both drugs were well tolerated; serious adverse events were uncommon and unrelated to study drugs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DP was superior to AL for reducing the risk of recurrent parasitemia and gametocytemia, and provided improved hemoglobin recovery. DP thus appears to be a good alternative to AL as first-line treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Uganda. To maximize the benefit of artemisinin-based combination therapy in Africa, treatment should be integrated with aggressive strategies to reduce malaria transmission intensity.</p>","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020020","citationCount":"159","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 159

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Uganda.

Design: Randomized single-blinded clinical trial.

Setting: Apac, Uganda, an area of very high malaria transmission intensity.

Participants: Children aged 6 mo to 10 y with uncomplicated falciparum malaria.

Intervention: Treatment of malaria with AL or DP, each following standard 3-d dosing regimens.

Outcome measures: Risks of recurrent parasitemia at 28 and 42 d, unadjusted and adjusted by genotyping to distinguish recrudescences and new infections.

Results: Of 421 enrolled participants, 417 (99%) completed follow-up. The unadjusted risk of recurrent falciparum parasitemia was significantly lower for participants treated with DP than for those treated with AL after 28 d (11% versus 29%; risk difference [RD] 18%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 11%-26%) and 42 d (43% versus 53%; RD 9.6%, 95% CI 0%-19%) of follow-up. Similarly, the risk of recurrent parasitemia due to possible recrudescence (adjusted by genotyping) was significantly lower for participants treated with DP than for those treated with AL after 28 d (1.9% versus 8.9%; RD 7.0%, 95% CI 2.5%-12%) and 42 d (6.9% versus 16%; RD 9.5%, 95% CI 2.8%-16%). Patients treated with DP had a lower risk of recurrent parasitemia due to non-falciparum species, development of gametocytemia, and higher mean increase in hemoglobin compared to patients treated with AL. Both drugs were well tolerated; serious adverse events were uncommon and unrelated to study drugs.

Conclusion: DP was superior to AL for reducing the risk of recurrent parasitemia and gametocytemia, and provided improved hemoglobin recovery. DP thus appears to be a good alternative to AL as first-line treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Uganda. To maximize the benefit of artemisinin-based combination therapy in Africa, treatment should be integrated with aggressive strategies to reduce malaria transmission intensity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青蒿素-氨芳汀与双氢青蒿素-哌喹治疗疟疾:一项随机试验
目的:比较青蒿素-氨芳汀(AL)和双氢青蒿素-哌喹(DP)治疗乌干达无并发症恶性疟疾的疗效和安全性。设计:随机单盲临床试验。环境:Apac,乌干达,疟疾传播强度非常高的地区。参与者:患有无并发症恶性疟疾的6个月至10岁儿童。干预:用AL或DP治疗疟疾,每一种都遵循标准的三维给药方案。结果指标:28天和42天寄生虫病复发的风险,未调整和通过基因分型调整以区分复发和新感染。结果:421名入组参与者中,417名(99%)完成随访。在28 d后,接受DP治疗的患者复发恶性寄生虫病的未调整风险显著低于接受AL治疗的患者(11% vs 29%;风险差异[RD] 18%, 95%可信区间[CI] 11%-26%)和42 d(43%对53%;RD为9.6%,95% CI为0%-19%)。同样,在28天后,接受DP治疗的患者因可能复发而复发寄生虫病的风险(通过基因分型调整)显著低于接受AL治疗的患者(1.9% vs 8.9%;RD 7.0%, 95% CI 2.5%-12%)和42 d(6.9%对16%;Rd 9.5%, 95% ci 2.8%-16%)。与AL治疗的患者相比,DP治疗的患者复发性寄生虫病的风险较低,因为非恶性疟原虫、配子体的发展和血红蛋白的平均升高。两种药物耐受性良好;严重不良事件不常见,且与研究药物无关。结论:DP在降低寄生虫病和配子细胞病复发风险方面优于AL,并能改善血红蛋白恢复。因此,在乌干达,DP似乎是AL的一个很好的替代方案,可以作为简单疟疾的一线治疗方法。为了最大限度地发挥以青蒿素为基础的联合疗法在非洲的效益,治疗应与降低疟疾传播强度的积极战略相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can biomarkers identify women at increased stroke risk? The Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trials. A cluster-randomised trial evaluating an intervention for patients with stress-related mental disorders and sick leave in primary care. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for prevention of HIV infection in women: a phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The effect of acclydine in chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Artemether-lumefantrine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for treatment of malaria: a randomized trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1