Xenotransplantation: a rational choice?

Penn bioethics journal Pub Date : 2006-01-01
Ololade Olakanmi
{"title":"Xenotransplantation: a rational choice?","authors":"Ololade Olakanmi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are many potential benefits that xenotransplantation (cross-species transplantation) might afford us, but there are also many weighty biological hurdles which must be surmounted if this procedure is ever to become a clinical reality. Many of these biological concerns are being addressed by specific and novel therapies; however, we must still determine the point at which xenotransplantation could be considered safe enough for clinical implementation. Many members of the scientific community believe that we should strive to make xenotransplantation products as safe and effective as possible, whereas others argue that we should not need to optimize the safety and efficaciousness of xenotransplantation products for them to be deemed acceptable for human use. In this paper I take the latter position, I argue that \"the scientific community should move from the paradigm of...trying to indicate to society optimal solutions to that of...trying to help society in finding 'satisficing' solutions\" which, although not necessarily optimal, are, nevertheless, good enough (Giampietro, 2002, p. 466).</p>","PeriodicalId":87452,"journal":{"name":"Penn bioethics journal","volume":"2 2","pages":"38-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Penn bioethics journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are many potential benefits that xenotransplantation (cross-species transplantation) might afford us, but there are also many weighty biological hurdles which must be surmounted if this procedure is ever to become a clinical reality. Many of these biological concerns are being addressed by specific and novel therapies; however, we must still determine the point at which xenotransplantation could be considered safe enough for clinical implementation. Many members of the scientific community believe that we should strive to make xenotransplantation products as safe and effective as possible, whereas others argue that we should not need to optimize the safety and efficaciousness of xenotransplantation products for them to be deemed acceptable for human use. In this paper I take the latter position, I argue that "the scientific community should move from the paradigm of...trying to indicate to society optimal solutions to that of...trying to help society in finding 'satisficing' solutions" which, although not necessarily optimal, are, nevertheless, good enough (Giampietro, 2002, p. 466).

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
异种器官移植:理性的选择?
异种移植(跨物种移植)可能给我们带来许多潜在的好处,但如果这一手术成为临床现实,也有许多沉重的生物学障碍必须克服。许多这些生物学问题正在通过特殊和新颖的疗法得到解决;然而,我们仍然必须确定异种移植可以被认为是足够安全的临床实施的点。科学界的许多成员认为,我们应该努力使异种移植产品尽可能安全和有效,而另一些人则认为,我们不应该优化异种移植产品的安全性和有效性,因为它们被认为可用于人类。在本文中,我采取后一种立场,我认为“科学界应该从……试图向社会指出……的最佳解决方案。试图帮助社会找到“令人满意的”解决方案,尽管不一定是最佳的,但仍然足够好(Giampietro, 2002, p. 466)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The moral implications of prenatal genetic testing. Justified paternalism: the nature of beneficence in the care of dementia patients. The ethics of placebo-controlled studies on perinatal HIV transmission and its treatment in the developing world. Abortion: pro and contra. Kant's assessment of motivation in the fulfillment of social obligations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1