Rifampicin/Cotrimoxazole/Isoniazid versus mefloquine or quinine + sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine for malaria: a randomized trial.

Blaise Genton, Ivo Mueller, Inoni Betuela, Gerard Casey, Meza Ginny, Michael P Alpers, John C Reeder
{"title":"Rifampicin/Cotrimoxazole/Isoniazid versus mefloquine or quinine + sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine for malaria: a randomized trial.","authors":"Blaise Genton,&nbsp;Ivo Mueller,&nbsp;Inoni Betuela,&nbsp;Gerard Casey,&nbsp;Meza Ginny,&nbsp;Michael P Alpers,&nbsp;John C Reeder","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0010038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Previous studies of a fixed combination including cotrimoxazole, rifampicin, and isoniazid (Cotrifazid) showed efficacy against resistant strains of Plasmodium falciparum in animal models and in small-scale human studies. We conducted a multicentric noninferiority trial to assess the safety and efficacy of Cotrifazid against drug-resistant malaria in Papua New Guinea.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The trial design was open-label, block-randomised, comparative, and multicentric.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The trial was conducted in four primary care health facilities, two in urban and two in rural areas of Madang and East Sepik Province, Papua New Guinea.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients of all ages with recurrent uncomplicated malaria were included.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned to receive Cotrifazid, mefloquine, or the standard treatment of quinine with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP).</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse events and rate of clinical and/or parasitological failure at day 14 were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The safety analysis population included 123 patients assigned to Cotrifazid, 123 to mefloquine, and 123 to quinine + SP. The Cotrifazid group experienced lower overall incidence of adverse events than the other groups. Among the efficacy analysis population (72 Cotrifazid, 71 mefloquine, and 75 quinine + SP), clinical failure rate (symptoms and parasite load) on day 14 was equivalent for the three groups (0% for Cotrifazid and mefloquine; 1% for quinine + SP), but parasitological failure rate (P. falciparum asexual blood-stage) was higher for Cotrifazid than for mefloquine or quinine + SP (9% [PCR corrected 8%] versus 0% and 3%, respectively [p = 0.02]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite what appears to be short-term clinical equivalence, the notable parasitological failure at day 14 in both P. falciparum and P. vivax makes Cotrifazid in its current formulation and regimen a poor alternative combination therapy for malaria.</p>","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010038","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Objectives: Previous studies of a fixed combination including cotrimoxazole, rifampicin, and isoniazid (Cotrifazid) showed efficacy against resistant strains of Plasmodium falciparum in animal models and in small-scale human studies. We conducted a multicentric noninferiority trial to assess the safety and efficacy of Cotrifazid against drug-resistant malaria in Papua New Guinea.

Design: The trial design was open-label, block-randomised, comparative, and multicentric.

Setting: The trial was conducted in four primary care health facilities, two in urban and two in rural areas of Madang and East Sepik Province, Papua New Guinea.

Participants: Patients of all ages with recurrent uncomplicated malaria were included.

Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive Cotrifazid, mefloquine, or the standard treatment of quinine with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP).

Outcome measures: Incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse events and rate of clinical and/or parasitological failure at day 14 were recorded.

Results: The safety analysis population included 123 patients assigned to Cotrifazid, 123 to mefloquine, and 123 to quinine + SP. The Cotrifazid group experienced lower overall incidence of adverse events than the other groups. Among the efficacy analysis population (72 Cotrifazid, 71 mefloquine, and 75 quinine + SP), clinical failure rate (symptoms and parasite load) on day 14 was equivalent for the three groups (0% for Cotrifazid and mefloquine; 1% for quinine + SP), but parasitological failure rate (P. falciparum asexual blood-stage) was higher for Cotrifazid than for mefloquine or quinine + SP (9% [PCR corrected 8%] versus 0% and 3%, respectively [p = 0.02]).

Conclusion: Despite what appears to be short-term clinical equivalence, the notable parasitological failure at day 14 in both P. falciparum and P. vivax makes Cotrifazid in its current formulation and regimen a poor alternative combination therapy for malaria.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利福平/复方新诺明/异烟肼与甲氟喹或奎宁+磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶治疗疟疾的随机试验
目的:在动物模型和小规模人体研究中,复方新诺明、利福平和异烟肼(Cotrifazid)的固定组合研究显示对恶性疟原虫耐药菌株有效。我们在巴布亚新几内亚进行了一项多中心非劣效性试验,以评估Cotrifazid治疗耐药疟疾的安全性和有效性。设计:试验设计为开放标签、分组随机、比较和多中心。环境:试验在四个初级保健卫生设施中进行,两个在城市,两个在巴布亚新几内亚马当省和东塞皮克省的农村地区。参与者:包括所有年龄的复发性无并发症疟疾患者。干预措施:患者被随机分配接受复方吡嗪、甲氟喹或奎宁联合磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶(SP)的标准治疗。结果测量:记录第14天临床和实验室不良事件的发生率以及临床和/或寄生虫学失败率。结果:安全性分析人群包括123例Cotrifazid组,123例甲氟喹组,123例奎宁+ SP组。Cotrifazid组总体不良事件发生率低于其他组。在疗效分析人群(Cotrifazid 72例,甲氟喹71例,奎宁+ SP 75例)中,三组在第14天的临床失败率(症状和寄生虫载量)相当(Cotrifazid和甲氟喹为0%;但Cotrifazid的寄生虫学失败率(恶性疟原虫无性血期)高于甲氟喹或奎宁+ SP(分别为9% [PCR校正8%]和0%和3% [p = 0.02])。结论:尽管Cotrifazid在短期内具有临床等效性,但在第14天对恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫均出现明显的寄生虫学失败,这使得其目前的配方和方案成为治疗疟疾的一种较差的替代联合疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can biomarkers identify women at increased stroke risk? The Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trials. A cluster-randomised trial evaluating an intervention for patients with stress-related mental disorders and sick leave in primary care. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for prevention of HIV infection in women: a phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The effect of acclydine in chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Artemether-lumefantrine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for treatment of malaria: a randomized trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1